This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Very tempting. This is the rare OLED laptop with a touch screen. Three primary items keeping my on my aging (non-OLED) Spectre are:
The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Very tempting. This is the rare OLED laptop with a touch screen. Three primary items keeping my on my aging (non-OLED) Spectre are:
The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Good luck!
Jon
This is very helpful commentary as I determine the best options for my family. Repped!
Very tempting. This is the rare OLED laptop with a touch screen. Three primary items keeping my on my aging (non-OLED) Spectre are:
The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Good luck!
Jon
Useful comment. Having a desktop 12700k, I think 2P&8E is a good mix for a laptop that isn't primarily geared on gaming. Multi-threaded loads will do well as the E cores are no slouch, and the 2 P cores will do fine for burst or loads that don't use a lot of threads. It's going to be better than a previous gen 4C/8T CPU, generally speaking. I'd still prefer an AMD CPU though, for battery life.
I've wondered about the OLED screens. Does having a dark/black background and using dark theme help a lot? I know on phones it typically makes some difference.
This seems like a good deal. I was hoping someone could advise me if this wound be a good machine for my scenario. My daughter is going to 10th grade next year. She uses her laptop to draw, annotate, as well as other basic laptop uses. She currently has a 2 in 1 Lenovo but the keys have gone bad and it's slow. I would like something that could last her a few years and allow her to use the touchscreen with some level of precision for drawing, notes, and annotating. Would this be good? It's more than I wanted to spend but if it's worth it I would do it. She would also be carrying it to school so lighter is better.
This seems like a good deal. I was hoping someone could advise me if this wound be a good machine for my scenario. My daughter is going to 10th grade next year. She uses her laptop to draw, annotate, as well as other basic laptop uses. She currently has a 2 in 1 Lenovo but the keys have gone bad and it's slow. I would like something that could last her a few years and allow her to use the touchscreen with some level of precision for drawing, notes, and annotating. Would this be good? It's more than I wanted to spend but if it's worth it I would do it. She would also be carrying it to school so lighter is better.
Probably overkill. Truthfully, anyone not explicitly shopping for an OLED-equipped laptop could get better value for money depending upon their needs.
Your particular use case sounds ideal for something like almost any of the Microsoft Surface devices. Tablet and laptop Surface models have support for standard pen inputs. You don't necessarily get high-performance specs, but what is available is usually a solid, long-term productivity platform for Excel/browsing/Minecraft/etc. while still being a fairly sleek package for the price point. The price point / value proposition tends to demand a premium over commodity laptops (think clunky but high-value 15.6" laptops at $300-500) while comparing reasonably with properly high-end models (something like a Dell XPS which tend to combine premium build quality and high performance).
About the only model to really avoid for certain is the Surface Pro X, an ARM-based model which is not broken but isn't really the kind of device you'd hand to the average user (despite some of the recent discounting on that model). Additionally, the Surface Go series has some configurations in the all three generations which were underspecified even at launch and could be safely avoided (such as models with 4GB of RAM).
Good luck!
Jon
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
5 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
- The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
- The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
- Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Good luck!The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Jon
- The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
- The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
- Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Good luck!The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Jon
- The CPU is objectively great, as is the case with most Intel Alder Lake 12 generation CPUs. However, the specific CPU is the U-series efficiency models built using 2 Performance + 8 Efficiency cores. This is appropriate in something like the Envy which sits, in part, in the thin & light category. However, I might prefer at this premium price point something like one of the P-series performance models with 4 (or greater) Performance + 8 Efficiency cores.
- The screen is going to be beautiful, but the high resolution is going to present two challenges. First, high resolution screens remain problematic for those (admittedly few) applications which fail to work well with Windows scaling. I regularly make use of academic software that defaults to being an eye chart on my current Spectre's 4k screen. Using an external monitor can also bring into play another scaling compatibility bug where apps get blurry (was just helping someone troubleshoot this with Matlab a few months ago).
- Though the Envy models are very sleek, the Spectre models take it to another level and it really tends to show. Recent Spectre models have had some divisive design choices. However, despite very small dimensional differences there is always a significantly different feel to my own Spectre and a newer Envy model that I daily drive at home (the Envy being a newer model I purchased for my spouse).
Good luck!The other issue for high resolution OLED panels is the baseline power draw. Overall, with a screen this small I think 1080p provides a solid balance of picture quality, power draw, and broad compatibility.
Jon
I've wondered about the OLED screens. Does having a dark/black background and using dark theme help a lot? I know on phones it typically makes some difference.
Your particular use case sounds ideal for something like almost any of the Microsoft Surface devices. Tablet and laptop Surface models have support for standard pen inputs. You don't necessarily get high-performance specs, but what is available is usually a solid, long-term productivity platform for Excel/browsing/Minecraft/etc. while still being a fairly sleek package for the price point. The price point / value proposition tends to demand a premium over commodity laptops (think clunky but high-value 15.6" laptops at $300-500) while comparing reasonably with properly high-end models (something like a Dell XPS which tend to combine premium build quality and high performance).
Typically the Surface Laptop series have had some of the best deals on Microsoft refurbished and warrantied units, leaving you plenty of budget to go grab a Microsoft pen and no need to budget for a separate keyboard as with the tablet models. Of course, the use case you described may warrant some consideration of the tablet model.
About the only model to really avoid for certain is the Surface Pro X, an ARM-based model which is not broken but isn't really the kind of device you'd hand to the average user (despite some of the recent discounting on that model). Additionally, the Surface Go series has some configurations in the all three generations which were underspecified even at launch and could be safely avoided (such as models with 4GB of RAM).
Good luck!
Jon
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!