Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Jul 11, 2023 08:36 PM
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Jul 11, 2023 08:36 PM

$7.99: Jurassic World Dominion - Extended Edition (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital)

$7.99

$9.99

20% off
Amazon
3 Comments 1,184 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has Jurassic World Dominion - Extended Edition (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital) for $7.99.
Shipping is free with Prime or on $25+ orders.

Price:
$2.00 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $9.99

Customer reviews:
★★★★ / 8,525 global ratings
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has Jurassic World Dominion - Extended Edition (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital) for $7.99.
Shipping is free with Prime or on $25+ orders.

Price:
$2.00 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $9.99

Customer reviews:
★★★★ / 8,525 global ratings

Community Voting

Deal Score
+5
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Jurassic World Dominion (4K/UHD + Blu-ray + Digital)

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 11/18/2025, 08:30 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$12.99
Target$21.49

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

3 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 12, 2023 06:33 PM
1,204 Posts
Joined Dec 2013
DrGordonFreemanJul 12, 2023 06:33 PM
1,204 Posts
I love the original Jurassic Park and actually enjoyed the first Jurassic World.

This movie borderline angered me. It was so ineptly made, and squandered its legacy cast in such a strange and frustrating manner. I like Chris Pratt but I've never seen an actor look so visibly "clocked out" and no doubt it had to do with production turmoil, as I believe the original director stepped away last minute and I could be wrong but the overall vibe I got was that they were winging this as they went along and didn't really have a complete or acceptable script before they rushed into production. The whole storyline with the giant insects, cloned humans and the evil Tim Cook scientist guy was just… bizarre. You bring back Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum and Laura Dern and you focus on this weird subplot that has nothing to do, really, with the prior films? The giant locust stuff seemed so perplexingly misplaced and misguided.

The second film in the reboot series was not very memorable, but it was also not particularly bad. It was just kind of mediocre. This one was *bad*. Unforgivably so, imo. I just cannot believe they brought back the core actors from the original series and blew the opportunity to make a halfway enjoyable film. Shameful.
Jul 13, 2023 02:23 AM
109 Posts
Joined Jan 2020
MaroonEducation852Jul 13, 2023 02:23 AM
109 Posts
Quote from DrGordonFreeman :
I love the original Jurassic Park and actually enjoyed the first Jurassic World.

This movie borderline angered me. It was so ineptly made, and squandered its legacy cast in such a strange and frustrating manner. I like Chris Pratt but I've never seen an actor look so visibly "clocked out" and no doubt it had to do with production turmoil, as I believe the original director stepped away last minute and I could be wrong but the overall vibe I got was that they were winging this as they went along and didn't really have a complete or acceptable script before they rushed into production. The whole storyline with the giant insects, cloned humans and the evil Tim Cook scientist guy was just… bizarre. You bring back Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum and Laura Dern and you focus on this weird subplot that has nothing to do, really, with the prior films? The giant locust stuff seemed so perplexingly misplaced and misguided.

The second film in the reboot series was not very memorable, but it was also not particularly bad. It was just kind of mediocre. This one was *bad*. Unforgivably so, imo. I just cannot believe they brought back the core actors from the original series and blew the opportunity to make a halfway enjoyable film. Shameful.
Agreed. I watched it for free on an airplane and even then I kept looking at my watch because it felt so long. It was a movie that I forced myself to finish just because I wanted to reach the end. The original jurassic park was so much more suspenseful.
Jul 13, 2023 06:15 AM
3,514 Posts
Joined Feb 2009
sdaddict001Jul 13, 2023 06:15 AM
3,514 Posts
Quote from DrGordonFreeman :
I love the original Jurassic Park and actually enjoyed the first Jurassic World.

This movie borderline angered me. It was so ineptly made, and squandered its legacy cast in such a strange and frustrating manner. I like Chris Pratt but I've never seen an actor look so visibly "clocked out" and no doubt it had to do with production turmoil, as I believe the original director stepped away last minute and I could be wrong but the overall vibe I got was that they were winging this as they went along and didn't really have a complete or acceptable script before they rushed into production. The whole storyline with the giant insects, cloned humans and the evil Tim Cook scientist guy was just… bizarre. You bring back Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum and Laura Dern and you focus on this weird subplot that has nothing to do, really, with the prior films? The giant locust stuff seemed so perplexingly misplaced and misguided.

The second film in the reboot series was not very memorable, but it was also not particularly bad. It was just kind of mediocre. This one was *bad*. Unforgivably so, imo. I just cannot believe they brought back the core actors from the original series and blew the opportunity to make a halfway enjoyable film. Shameful.
Totally agree with what you mentioned. This was not worth even watching let alone owning it. Really missed the opportunity. Jurassic Park and Jurassic World are my favorites.
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals