Our research indicates that this offer (256GB) is $50 lower (5% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $1099.99.
About this product:
1-year warranty
About this store:
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Our research indicates that this offer (256GB) is $50 lower (5% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $1099.99.
About this product:
1-year warranty
About this store:
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
8gb is enough for watching videos, daily browsering, excel, word etc.
However it is not ideal for video editing, docker or simulator/emulator based software development.
I gotta say it's kinda criminal Apple is still selling $1,000+ laptops in 2023 with 8gb ram. Unified memory or not, it's just not enough for anything more than basic usage -- in which case (if you're a basic user) why buy a $1,000+ laptop?
I gotta say it's kinda criminal Apple is still selling $1,000+ laptops in 2023 with 8gb ram. Unified memory or not, it's just not enough for anything more than basic usage -- in which case (if you're a basic user) why buy a $1,000+ laptop?
Why on earth people like you keep talking about not buying Apple products in every Apple deal thread. No gives a rat ** to what you think but you still need to waste your valuable time !! Move on and do something more productive
I gotta say it's kinda criminal Apple is still selling $1,000+ laptops in 2023 with 8gb ram. Unified memory or not, it's just not enough for anything more than basic usage -- in which case (if you're a basic user) why buy a $1,000+ laptop?
Visiting this thread to try to see how people justify paying twice as much for a Macbook over any other laptop.
There's a Lenovo laptop with 512GB SSD, 8GB RAM and a RTX 4050 that would probably outperform this thing for $700, but like many in this thread are saying, 8GB of RAM is woefully underpowered these days. If you want a *nix OS, you can flash it, or dual boot even.
Edit: I'm a Philips Hue enthusiast myself, so I understand paying more for something better, but... The only benefit I see here is a long life battery?
Last edited by GetSales November 16, 2023 at 04:35 PM.
Why on earth people like you keep talking about not buying Apple products in every Apple deal thread. No gives a rat ** to what you think but you still need to waste your valuable time !! Move on and do something more productive
Apple uses Intel. You don't understand your problem well enough to diagnose it.
Er… this is the m2 chip. Apple designed this. The whole big deal about the m1/m2 chips was Apple decided to make their own instead of using intel chips.
Hence why the M1 chips were so good.
I literally had a MacBook the year prior to m1 being release, running on intel… wow what a huge difference going to M1 chip
I do understand why people are frustrated that Apple would put so little memory in such an expensive laptop. However, I have read an article that at least somewhat offsets the concerns regarding only 8gb vs 16.
What it said was Macs, like PCs, use swap files on the HD when ram needs exceed the physically installed memory limits. When computers typically had mechanical HDs the HD speeds were much slower than RAM so you took a huge speed hit when you had to move from RAM to HD. As computers have moved to faster SSD drives the penalty for using a swap file isn't as bad as it used to be. 8gb is probably enough that most tasks most users do won't need more memory. The few times they do the speed of the SSD makes the swap file usage not that bad.
This does make sense to me though a few other things I've read give me pause. While SSDs are fast, apparently the smaller Apple SSDs used just a single chip (I think that was the 256gb drive). Those single chip configurations were half as fast as the two chip versions. So you had to get the larger SSD to take advantage of the speed the system supported. The other issue is the swap file represents a large number of read-write cycles on the SSD. Thus the SSD may die an early death if you end up constantly using a swap file. Since the drives aren't upgradable that means the whole motherboard/computer dies an early death.
Of course, the above would be an easier tradeoff to justify in the mind of the consumer if it actually cost Apple anywhere near the $200+ they charge for the upgrade. That the actual price difference is likely less than $50 (perhaps much less) I do see the annoyance. Apple generally makes good hardware but given the lack of serviceability in the new stuff and the large Apple tax I do find it hard to stomach the cost over a good Windows system. That said, I've converted at least a few people from PC into Mac users because I do trust the stability of the system more than Windows. I don't think Windows is hard to keep running (my current copy on this computer was installed once Windows 7->10 upgrade was available) but it's not as easy as OSx. Also, if you buy a Mac you are unlikely to get a junky computer. Plenty of PCs are crap.
thank you for your comment. i basically fresh installed the windows 11 and have not seen any virus/malware activities, so very likely it's the app.
if there is virus/malware, my pc is consistently 24/7 full blown fan, but once the trading hours is over, the trading app is working as normal, no freeze, so i m not really sure what's wrong other than the cpu and its age
i also have a desktop with the latest i7 13th gen cpu, and the app does not lag at all
I think the answer you are looking for is right there in your post. If the issue goes away after 4PM EST, then the issue is with the application itself and how the underlying infrastructure handles the volume of trades. You can throw all the CPU, RAM, and SSD at it and it won't make a difference if the app and it's underlying network is poorly made.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
However it is not ideal for video editing, docker or simulator/emulator based software development.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
163 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
You are being played.
There's a Lenovo laptop with 512GB SSD, 8GB RAM and a RTX 4050 that would probably outperform this thing for $700, but like many in this thread are saying, 8GB of RAM is woefully underpowered these days. If you want a *nix OS, you can flash it, or dual boot even.
Edit: I'm a Philips Hue enthusiast myself, so I understand paying more for something better, but... The only benefit I see here is a long life battery?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Hence why the M1 chips were so good.
I literally had a MacBook the year prior to m1 being release, running on intel… wow what a huge difference going to M1 chip
What it said was Macs, like PCs, use swap files on the HD when ram needs exceed the physically installed memory limits. When computers typically had mechanical HDs the HD speeds were much slower than RAM so you took a huge speed hit when you had to move from RAM to HD. As computers have moved to faster SSD drives the penalty for using a swap file isn't as bad as it used to be. 8gb is probably enough that most tasks most users do won't need more memory. The few times they do the speed of the SSD makes the swap file usage not that bad.
This does make sense to me though a few other things I've read give me pause. While SSDs are fast, apparently the smaller Apple SSDs used just a single chip (I think that was the 256gb drive). Those single chip configurations were half as fast as the two chip versions. So you had to get the larger SSD to take advantage of the speed the system supported. The other issue is the swap file represents a large number of read-write cycles on the SSD. Thus the SSD may die an early death if you end up constantly using a swap file. Since the drives aren't upgradable that means the whole motherboard/computer dies an early death.
Of course, the above would be an easier tradeoff to justify in the mind of the consumer if it actually cost Apple anywhere near the $200+ they charge for the upgrade. That the actual price difference is likely less than $50 (perhaps much less) I do see the annoyance. Apple generally makes good hardware but given the lack of serviceability in the new stuff and the large Apple tax I do find it hard to stomach the cost over a good Windows system. That said, I've converted at least a few people from PC into Mac users because I do trust the stability of the system more than Windows. I don't think Windows is hard to keep running (my current copy on this computer was installed once Windows 7->10 upgrade was available) but it's not as easy as OSx. Also, if you buy a Mac you are unlikely to get a junky computer. Plenty of PCs are crap.
Too much over priced.
if there is virus/malware, my pc is consistently 24/7 full blown fan, but once the trading hours is over, the trading app is working as normal, no freeze, so i m not really sure what's wrong other than the cpu and its age
i also have a desktop with the latest i7 13th gen cpu, and the app does not lag at all
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://slickdeals.net/f/17051578-apple-macbook-pro-m1-pro-8-core-14-2-liquid-retina-xdr-32gb-ram-512gb-ssd-1499?src=SiteSe
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!