Adorama has select Canon EOS R6 Mark II 24.2MP Full Frame Mirrorless Digital Camera Body/Len's Bundle on sale listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal
Note, these bundles may include additional accessories/freebies w/ purchase: Canon LP-E6NH 7.2V Lithium Ion Battery Pack + 128GB Lexar Professional SDXC U3 Memory Card (automatically added to cart).
BH Photo Video also has select Canon EOS R6 Mark II 24.2MP Full Frame Mirrorless Digital Camera Body/Len's Bundle on sale listed below. Shipping is free.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II Camera features 24.2MP/5-Axis Up to 8-Stops w/ Low Light AF/4K 60P/3" Viewscreen; great for compact/lightweight photography but offers high quality full frame imaging w/ many compatible RF lenses
Bundle includes $121.09 worth of free accessories (automatically added to cart)
Adorama is an authorized dealer/reseller of Canon products
Offer valid while promotional pricing/special bundle offer last
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Adorama has select Canon EOS R6 Mark II 24.2MP Full Frame Mirrorless Digital Camera Body/Len's Bundle on sale listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal
Note, these bundles may include additional accessories/freebies w/ purchase: Canon LP-E6NH 7.2V Lithium Ion Battery Pack + 128GB Lexar Professional SDXC U3 Memory Card (automatically added to cart).
BH Photo Video also has select Canon EOS R6 Mark II 24.2MP Full Frame Mirrorless Digital Camera Body/Len's Bundle on sale listed below. Shipping is free.
The Canon EOS R6 Mark II Camera features 24.2MP/5-Axis Up to 8-Stops w/ Low Light AF/4K 60P/3" Viewscreen; great for compact/lightweight photography but offers high quality full frame imaging w/ many compatible RF lenses
Bundle includes $121.09 worth of free accessories (automatically added to cart)
Adorama is an authorized dealer/reseller of Canon products
Offer valid while promotional pricing/special bundle offer last
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
As a long time Canon user, and a current 5D Mark IV owner, I would recommend looking at the lens prices for the RF full frame lenses, before going into the RF ecosystem.
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
I'm using the R6 Mk2 with both RF lenses and adapted EF lenses and the only perceivable difference (to me, at least, though a more experienced user might notice more) is that RF lenses have slightly faster autofocus. Other than that, I'm happy to save several thousand dollars by using EF lenses in the meantime.
Bought a refurb yesterday R6II, $1979. Deal no longer available. If you purchase, do it on phone and ask for discounts on accessories, got $30 off a lens adapter. Love my new camera, heck of a upgrade over my 6D! Invest in the R series glass, got a 24-105 separately (better deal from Canada) and then got a 100 500mm from Best Buy ($300 off list sale) that's so good I don't need a macro! Marvelous glass!
Last edited by Anderki November 6, 2023 at 05:20 AM.
need guidance, I am a hobbyist and looking for r8 for photo and video. is that a good option for a $1k lesser price than this?
If your work doesn't need lots of image stabilization (low light, or very long focal length), the R8 seems like a much better value. I'm holding out for the R6 as I do low light photography and the extra in body stabilization is something I want. Other differences seem not so material. With the R8, one still gets lens based image stabilization
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
As a long time Canon user, and a current 5D Mark IV owner, I would recommend looking at the lens prices for the RF full frame lenses, before going into the RF ecosystem.
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
If your work doesn't need lots of image stabilization (low light, or very long focal length), the R8 seems like a much better value. I'm holding out for the R6 as I do low light photography and the extra in body stabilization is something I want. Other differences seem not so material. With the R8, one still gets lens based image stabilization
thanks, is the low light photography factor consideration is due to missing image stabilization inside the body or the processor issue ? I think image stabilization can be taken care with lens or using tripod. Not sure how much difference it would make, but I am interested in low light photography too.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Quote
from looser24
:
Only 24MP? Is that a misprint?
No. The R6 has larger pixels so it has much cleaner pictures at high ISO.
I know it is apples and oranges, but my Olympus picture is bearly useful at anything higher than 3200 but R6 can produce very useful picture at even 102400.
If you application doesn't call for higher than 24MP, you will be pleasantly surprise by the imagine quality
As a long time Canon user, and a current 5D Mark IV owner, I would recommend looking at the lens prices for the RF full frame lenses, before going into the RF ecosystem.
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
I'm using the R6 Mk2 with both RF lenses and adapted EF lenses and the only perceivable difference (to me, at least, though a more experienced user might notice more) is that RF lenses have slightly faster autofocus. Other than that, I'm happy to save several thousand dollars by using EF lenses in the meantime.
9
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As a long time Canon user, and a current 5D Mark IV owner, I would recommend looking at the lens prices for the RF full frame lenses, before going into the RF ecosystem.
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
If you already have EF lenses, there's no downside of getting a RF body. The AF improvement alone is worth the jump. I have no RF lenses at all, but a bunch of EF lenses that I use on my R and R7. With the exception of my Sigma 120-300 sport, which pules in subject detection mode with objects up close, all of my EF glass works perfectly on both bodies.
4
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
59 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
I know it is apples and oranges, but my Olympus picture is bearly useful at anything higher than 3200 but R6 can produce very useful picture at even 102400.
If you application doesn't call for higher than 24MP, you will be pleasantly surprise by the imagine quality
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!