best buy on ebay https://www.ebay.com/itm/196084683530
and bhphoto: https://www.bhphotovide
Thanks mvpcrossxover
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | $210 |
15 |
![]() | $165 frontpage |
17 | |
![]() | $165 frontpage |
27 | |
![]() | ![]() | $210 |
0 |
![]() | ![]() | $209 frontpage |
52 |
![]() | $220 |
6 | |
![]() | ![]() | $240 frontpage |
34 |
![]() | $238 |
0 | |
![]() | $34 |
2 |
Top Comments
Nothing I've ever seen in the consumer realm.
The P3 is a DRAM-less (but supports HMB), QLC, NVMe drive. The MX500 has DRAM (512MB), TLC, and is SATA. Technically, the MX500 should theoretically be more reliable, due to the TLC NAND and presence of DRAM. Reality could be different.
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
37 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
and bhphoto: https://www.bhphotovide
Damn you, slickdeals! Lol
https://slickdeals.net/f/17095324-4tb-crucial-p3-pcie-gen3-m-2-solid-state-drive-ssd-160-free-shipping?p=1673
which was also posted by the same user/staff lol
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Seems like a safe buy (plus easy return if needed)
Seems like a safe buy (plus easy return if needed)
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MWink
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
Nothing I've ever seen in the consumer realm.
The P3 is a DRAM-less (but supports HMB), QLC, NVMe drive. The MX500 has DRAM (512MB), TLC, and is SATA. Technically, the MX500 should theoretically be more reliable, due to the TLC NAND and presence of DRAM. Reality could be different.
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
Seems like a safe buy (plus easy return if needed)
https://urlhasbeenblock
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.