This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
I am guessing Harvey is enforcing their patent or Jet is not willing to fight them. Similar like when SawStop forced Bosch to take down their version of safe table saw. Hurray patents - consumer always loses. Except today. For $30 worth a try.
I am guessing Harvey is enforcing their patent or Jet is not willing to fight them. Similar like when SawStop forced Bosch to take down their version of safe table saw. Hurray patents - consumer always loses. Except today. For $30 worth a try.
Look at the reviews. Just ok for dust. Gets clogged with anything larger. Not a good product.
I've read reviews which say it cracks really easily too, like if your bucket or bin tips over, or if it's on wheels and bangs into something when you start up your dust collector and the suction pulls on your flex hose (or when it clogs).
I am guessing Harvey is enforcing their patent or Jet is not willing to fight them. Similar like when SawStop forced Bosch to take down their version of safe table saw. Hurray patents - consumer always loses. Except today. For $30 worth a try.
patents will expire. as long as legislation doesn't change like copyright did then it's ok.
I am guessing Harvey is enforcing their patent or Jet is not willing to fight them. Similar like when SawStop forced Bosch to take down their version of safe table saw. Hurray patents - consumer always loses. Except today. For $30 worth a try.
I don't get blaming patents. Without intellectual property protections, we wouldn't have a lot of innovations we already take for granted, let alone future ones.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I don't get blaming patents. Without intellectual property protections, we wouldn't have a lot of innovations we already take for granted, let alone future ones.
we would.
they would just be a lot more secretive.
we would.
they would just be a lot more secretive.
Disagree. With the exception of maybe semiconductors, pretty much anything can be reverse engineered and copied. Patent protection largely prevents this from happening.
Disagree. With the exception of maybe semiconductors, pretty much anything can be reverse engineered and copied. Patent protection largely prevents this from happening.
yea, because patents require you to disclose how it works.
the whole point was to force you to share it.
even semiconductors can be reverse engineered and copied.
you think people would give up making new stuff if it's easily copied?
Leave a Comment
11 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
they would just be a lot more secretive.
they would just be a lot more secretive.
the whole point was to force you to share it.
even semiconductors can be reverse engineered and copied.
you think people would give up making new stuff if it's easily copied?
the whole point was to force you to share it.
even semiconductors can be reverse engineered and copied.
you think people would give up making new stuff if it's easily copied?
Leave a Comment