Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
adidas Men's Lite Racer Adapt 6.0 Shoes (Core Black / Core Black / Carbon) Expired
$27.50
$70.00
+ Free Shipping
adidas via eBay has adidas Men's Lite Racer Adapt 6.0 Slip-On Shoes (Core Black / Core Black / Carbon) for $55 - $27.50 in cart discount (or apply coupon code 50ADIDASCOUPON at checkout) = $27.50. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member Dealzslickk for posting this deal.
Features:
Thanks to Community Member Dealzslickk for posting this deal.
Features:
- Regular fit
- Slip-on
- Two-tone knit upper
- Cloudfoam
- Textile lining
- Synthetic outsole
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
- About the deal:
- Our research indicates that this deal is $19.75 less (41.8% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $47.25 at the time of this posting.
Original Post
Written by
Edited January 12, 2024
at 07:33 PM
With 50ADIDASCOUPON at checkout. Only black is available
https://www.ebay.com/itm/15571134...medi
https://www.ebay.com/itm/15571134...medi
in
Men's Shoes
(11)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
25 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
3.0s were what I originally fell in love with... Nnug enough to be able to move around in, but loose enough to be able to slide on without much effort... Since these have some age, and wear and tear on them, I use these as my gym shoes now. I can jog at 6.5mph on the treadmill without issue - and they provide plenty of support and cushion for me while lifting. Just don't wear into a mosh pit - learned this the hard way when mine came off after someone stepped on my heel.
4.0s are a little tight, but doable... I wear these some, but they're the least of all that I own and actively wear... I bought these after purchasing both 3.0s and 5.0s... Why on earth the 4.0s would fit significantly different and way more snug than both the 3.0s and 5.0s is beyond me...
5.0s work just fine for me - snug enough to not flop around when jogging, loose enough to slide on using just my feed and very comfortable. These are usually my airport shoes, as they are so easy to put on and take off while dealing with TSA. To me, these fit pretty much identically to my 3.0s.
6.0s were uncomfortable and I just gave up on trying to break them in. Wound up giving to a friend who has also abandoned them due to them being too tight...
Does anyone know why the fit on these different versions is so significantly different?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank m32311
3.0s were what I originally fell in love with... Nnug enough to be able to move around in, but loose enough to be able to slide on without much effort... Since these have some age, and wear and tear on them, I use these as my gym shoes now. I can jog at 6.5mph on the treadmill without issue - and they provide plenty of support and cushion for me while lifting. Just don't wear into a mosh pit - learned this the hard way when mine came off after someone stepped on my heel.
4.0s are a little tight, but doable... I wear these some, but they're the least of all that I own and actively wear... I bought these after purchasing both 3.0s and 5.0s... Why on earth the 4.0s would fit significantly different and way more snug than both the 3.0s and 5.0s is beyond me...
5.0s work just fine for me - snug enough to not flop around when jogging, loose enough to slide on using just my feed and very comfortable. These are usually my airport shoes, as they are so easy to put on and take off while dealing with TSA. To me, these fit pretty much identically to my 3.0s.
6.0s were uncomfortable and I just gave up on trying to break them in. Wound up giving to a friend who has also abandoned them due to them being too tight...
Does anyone know why the fit on these different versions is so significantly different?
Exactly! Give a week lol
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
3.0s were what I originally fell in love with... Nnug enough to be able to move around in, but loose enough to be able to slide on without much effort... Since these have some age, and wear and tear on them, I use these as my gym shoes now. I can jog at 6.5mph on the treadmill without issue - and they provide plenty of support and cushion for me while lifting. Just don't wear into a mosh pit - learned this the hard way when mine came off after someone stepped on my heel.
4.0s are a little tight, but doable... I wear these some, but they're the least of all that I own and actively wear... I bought these after purchasing both 3.0s and 5.0s... Why on earth the 4.0s would fit significantly different and way more snug than both the 3.0s and 5.0s is beyond me...
5.0s work just fine for me - snug enough to not flop around when jogging, loose enough to slide on using just my feed and very comfortable. These are usually my airport shoes, as they are so easy to put on and take off while dealing with TSA. To me, these fit pretty much identically to my 3.0s.
6.0s were uncomfortable and I just gave up on trying to break them in. Wound up giving to a friend who has also abandoned them due to them being too tight...
Does anyone know why the fit on these different versions is so significantly different?
I mean... A slightly different fit for a different version in a series? Sure... Doesn't make much sense to me, as I'd think "all Adidas size 12 are the same" makes the most sense, but whatever...
But a completely different fit for each version released in the series? This makes zero sense to me whatsoever....
I've always been able to roll with the assumption "my Converse 12s of this type fit perfectly, so I should find the 12s in this other type of Converse to be similarly fitting" - but not with Adidas...not at all...