Canon has
Canon EOS R6 Mark II Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera (Body Only, Refurbished) for
$1799.
Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member
AbbyDaddy for finding this deal.
Features:- High image quality featuring a new 24.2 megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor
- DIGIC X Image Processor with an ISO range of 100-102400
- RAW burst mode and pre-shooting captures up to approx. 30 fps
- Automatic subject detection of people, animals, and vehicles
- 6K oversampled uncropped 4K movie at up to 60 fps
- In-body Image Stabilizer with up to 8 stops of Shake Correction with Coordinated Control IS
- UVC/UAC compatibility allows use as a web camera and stream live video in Full HD
65 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Call (866) 443-8002, select option 2. It can only be done over the phone.
For a first camera and first lens, I'd rather see someone spend $220 (it's been cheaper refurbished during previous sales) than $800, especially when the performance wouldn't be easily noticed by someone starting. And the non-L is lighter, easier to carry.
And for someone's first camera, $1800 R6mkII is a bit of a enthusiast's price for a beginner's body. I'd probably look at the R10, RP, or R8.
(each piece of the below has been cheaper during previous sales, but since we don't have a time machine....)
A real nice powerhouse would be the $1100 R8 + 24-105 non-L for $220 and $500 for the RF 100-400. Combined....that's just a few dollars more than the R6 mkII body alone. You get a very excellent combination that's absolutely no slouch, covering quite a range of focal lengths on a budget. Toss in a RF 50mm f/1.8 at $100 for low-light performance and that's a trio worth keeping.
If you wanted to save a few dollars, one could always get the Canon RP at $600....saving an additional $500. Though I think the R8 is a bargain for what one gets, as it inherited many of the performance features from the top-of-class pro-tier R3.
If quality was one's biggest consideration...with the R6mkII + 24-105 L's total combined cost of $2600 being the max budget... one could make a case for getting the pro-tier RF 85mm f/1.2 @ $1800 and spend the remaining $800 on the RP with $200 to spare.... (or if possible, squeeze $300 more for the R8). Regardless, that lens is an absolute delight, and will shine on any mirrorless body. Glass is more important than the body anyways.
At least THAT lens has a major difference than its non-L cousins, even if it's not intended "for beginners".
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Thanks for the explanation. Whenever I bring up 6reen toe, I get downvoted by other sd members when all I'm trying to do is help people save money.
New is 20% off ($1839 + tax), Refurb is 10% off ($1619 + tax). I was able to ask for a lens converter discount as well. I got the 2972C for 10% off They have the non-ISO controlled one in refurb and that gets even higher discount.
Good luck if you decide to get it
As for the R8 being a toy....that's entirely unfair. It's smaller and lighter, but it's no toy. And please show evidence that Canon isn't performing expected warranty service on the R8.
Even if you disagree, and feel like they are durable enough for your use that's fine, its your opinion. However, they are objectively far less durable than the R6 and similar weather sealed bodies. I think build quality should not only be on the list of differences, it arguably should be first!
The Canon R8 (and RP, etc) are not functionally toys but they are simply not rugged enough for anything but occasional very controlled outdoor use. This is just my personal opinion its fine if you disagree. If yours survived a lot of outdoor use, you are lucky, they just aren't designed for it.
Even if you disagree, and feel like they are durable enough for your use that's fine, its your opinion. However, they are objectively far less durable than the R6 and similar weather sealed bodies. I think build quality should not only be on the list of differences, it arguably should be first!
I never claimed the warranty was different on higher end cameras. I wouldn't buy the higher end camera because it has a better warranty, I would buy it because its more reliable. If Canon had a more no-questions asked warranty on their cameras, I would be more willing to recommend the less reliable model.