Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expirediconian | Staff posted Mar 29, 2024 06:44 PM
expirediconian | Staff posted Mar 29, 2024 06:44 PM

SABRENT 10 Bay 3.5” SATA Hard Drive Tray Less Docking Station

+ Free Shipping

$398

$600

33% off
Amazon
226 Comments 80,170 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Update: This popular deal is available again with a new promo code.

Amazon has SABRENT 10 Bay 3.5" SATA Hard Drive Tray Less Docking Station (DS-UCTB) on sale for $398.38 when you apply promo code 200XUCTB during checkout. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C port supports transfer speeds of up to 10 Gbps
  • 10x SATA 6 Gbit/s 3.5" hard drive tray-less bays
  • Hot-Swappable with 10 independent ON/OFF power switches
  • Two 120mm fans for additional cooling capability
  • Note: This multi-bay station does NOT have built in RAID functionality. However, software RAID configurations are possible

Editor's Notes

Written by powerfuldoppler | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This popular deal is available again with a new promo code.

Amazon has SABRENT 10 Bay 3.5" SATA Hard Drive Tray Less Docking Station (DS-UCTB) on sale for $398.38 when you apply promo code 200XUCTB during checkout. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C port supports transfer speeds of up to 10 Gbps
  • 10x SATA 6 Gbit/s 3.5" hard drive tray-less bays
  • Hot-Swappable with 10 independent ON/OFF power switches
  • Two 120mm fans for additional cooling capability
  • Note: This multi-bay station does NOT have built in RAID functionality. However, software RAID configurations are possible

Editor's Notes

Written by powerfuldoppler | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+41
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: SABRENT 10 Bay 3.5” SATA Hard Drive Tray Less Docking Station (USB 3.2 Type C and Type A) (DS-UCTB)

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 4/4/2026, 11:48 PM
Sold By Sale Price
NewEgg$599.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

RelaxedRose979
232 Posts
34 Reputation
The issue is 10 drives sharing the 10Gbps USB 3.1 gen 2 interface. Hardware RAID is no longer recommended as software can keep up and gives the flexibility in not being paired with a specific controller or losing all of your data.

The Mini PCs we normally see listed max out with 2.5Gbps networking. So this would be able to keep up and saturate the pipe. If you needed more bandwidth, having separate direct SATA connections would be needed, likely with some type of external SAS connection.

10 drives is very large, unless you are going for extremely cheap small drives to fill the array. IMO it's better to use larger drives as each drive consumes power to run. UGreen has a Kickstarter going right now that has some really crazy deals for NASes that are supposed to ship in June. You might be more bang for your buck there.

Also, anyone thinking of using this many drives, Go with at least one parity disk, or even better two. The chance of data loss increases as you move to more and more drives. Not caring about movies on a single 10TB drive... fine. Not caring about 180TB, that's going to be a much larger pain to replace everything.
wherestheanykey
4997 Posts
874 Reputation
Be sure to throw it on a UPS.

I was checking what level of support it has from Sabrent (zero, they have really gone downhill with firmware updates) and there's a thread about how it doesn't have automatic power recovery to bring the drives back up after power loss.
iconian
76456 Posts
211083 Reputation
they are sausages, not hot dogs, get it right!


actually, i am not even sure of the reference? but sabrent is very well known in ssd and pc component business for the last 5-10 years

227 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 03, 2024 10:27 PM
232 Posts
Joined Jan 2020
RelaxedRose979Apr 03, 2024 10:27 PM
232 Posts
Quote from rb5505 :
is this kickstarter ugreen 4 slot a good option for plex with a mac mini, or is it overkill? is the sabrent here a better option? i'm just wanting to play tv shows & movies via plex.
Mac Mini doesn't matter. The UGreen should be an excellent solution for Plex, you can run it directly on the NAS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMNoyim3B5w

That video shows Plex running, it's using the Plus version of the 4 bay, but base N100 version will also work. I use an N100 Mini PC for to run Plex right now.
Apr 03, 2024 10:47 PM
703 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Nintendo1474Apr 03, 2024 10:47 PM
703 Posts
Quote from TrevorK :
So, no way to get the drives to hardware RAID controller?! Any array controllers take USB?
No, but you can run software raid. Windows Storage Spaces, StableBit DrivePool, ZFS if you're on Linux. Should all work fine.

I guess StoreMI doesn't do USB storage, oh well.
Last edited by Nintendo1474 April 4, 2024 at 11:38 AM.
Apr 03, 2024 11:39 PM
329 Posts
Joined Jul 2018
cpc13Apr 03, 2024 11:39 PM
329 Posts
Quote from Nintendo1474 :
Where's your source for that? Because my source says otherwise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l55GfAwa8RI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_JOtEBFHDs
My source is 25 years in the IT industry running IT/compute infrastructure for companies ranging from a smaller tech company (~150 people, ~200 servers) to a large enterprise (~20k people, ~15k+ VMs running on ~2k servers) and various environments in between. My "source" is various colleagues and and former coworkers, industry conferences, and what is deployed our data centers.

Go into any decent data center and nearly every server in nearly every rack is going to have a pair of system/OS disks on hardware RAID1. Additionally, depending on the type of computing, it's going to be using hardware RAID for local disks if its making use of local storage, or it's going to be using SAN and/or NAS in some way (which will be using hardware RAID).

This is basic, cheap "insurance" to improve the reliability and robustness of a server. You don't want to lose a physical server because the OS drive fails. That's a huge waste of time and resources to recover. Instead, business buy their servers with paired OS drives so that when a drive fails, they just ping their hardware support vendor, have a replacement disk sent out, and they hot-swap the failed disk and let the hardware RAID1 automatically rebuild it.
Apr 03, 2024 11:47 PM
2,064 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
samHDApr 03, 2024 11:47 PM
2,064 Posts
Quote from Nintendo1474 :
"You didn't look hard enough"

Called it in another comment. Every time, without fail.
have u managed to find google yet? http://www.google.com/ its a great place to find info. try it, if u can manage to find the energy.
Apr 04, 2024 12:16 AM
1,303 Posts
Joined Feb 2005
rb5505Apr 04, 2024 12:16 AM
1,303 Posts
Quote from RelaxedRose979 :
Mac Mini doesn't matter. The UGreen should be an excellent solution for Plex, you can run it directly on the NAS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMNoyim3B5w

That video shows Plex running, it's using the Plus version of the 4 bay, but base N100 version will also work. I use an N100 Mini PC for to run Plex right now.
thank you. what are the benefits of the plus version?
Apr 04, 2024 01:51 AM
232 Posts
Joined Jan 2020
RelaxedRose979Apr 04, 2024 01:51 AM
232 Posts
Quote from rb5505 :
thank you. what are the benefits of the plus version?
CPU that has one high performance core, can do up to 64GB of ram rather than 16GB. And 1x 10Gbps Ethernet + 1x 2.5Gbps rather than 2x 2.5Gbps.

For just a basic NAS and Plex, it's not needed.
Apr 04, 2024 02:24 AM
703 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Nintendo1474Apr 04, 2024 02:24 AM
703 Posts
Quote from cpc13 :
My source is 25 years in the IT industry running IT/compute infrastructure for companies ranging from a smaller tech company (~150 people, ~200 servers) to a large enterprise (~20k people, ~15k+ VMs running on ~2k servers) and various environments in between. My "source" is various colleagues and and former coworkers, industry conferences, and what is deployed our data centers.

Go into any decent data center and nearly every server in nearly every rack is going to have a pair of system/OS disks on hardware RAID1. Additionally, depending on the type of computing, it's going to be using hardware RAID for local disks if its making use of local storage, or it's going to be using SAN and/or NAS in some way (which will be using hardware RAID).

This is basic, cheap "insurance" to improve the reliability and robustness of a server. You don't want to lose a physical server because the OS drive fails. That's a huge waste of time and resources to recover. Instead, business buy their servers with paired OS drives so that when a drive fails, they just ping their hardware support vendor, have a replacement disk sent out, and they hot-swap the failed disk and let the hardware RAID1 automatically rebuild it.
Ah, so your source is your own ass. I see.

I am also an IT professional with 25 years of experience in doing all the things you said. I also have various colleagues and former coworkers who have told me things about IT. And we all agree that you're wrong.

There, now we are on equal footing in that regard. But I'm still ahead in terms of visible, researchable links to proof.
2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 04, 2024 02:27 AM
703 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Nintendo1474Apr 04, 2024 02:27 AM
703 Posts
Quote from samHD :
have u managed to find google yet? http://www.google.com/ its a great place to find info. try it, if u can manage to find the energy.
I don't use Google, not a fan of their data privacy practices. Also they've really gone downhill recently. I switched to DuckDuckGo.
1
2
1
Apr 04, 2024 02:53 PM
155 Posts
Joined May 2017
cpgeekApr 04, 2024 02:53 PM
155 Posts
Quote from namlook :
Is it really that surprising that most people don't want to build computers to add storage? I build my own primary computers but I also bought a Terramaster DAS when it was on sale. I love it, it's small, and it fits nicely on my desk.
honestly yes, knowing that long-term properly resilient storage is it's own problem that requires ongoing monitoring from a separate system, regular scrubbing, regular (preferably automated) backups to an off-site system, and ESPECIALLY if you want multiple users to access the data (that part is optional though). at this point, I think that everyone who wants more storage than will fit on their primary ssd should probably own a proper 6-8 bay nas at this point.
Apr 04, 2024 06:30 PM
155 Posts
Joined May 2017
cpgeekApr 04, 2024 06:30 PM
155 Posts
Quote :
Quote from TrevorK :
So, no way to get the drives to hardware RAID controller?! Any array controllers take USB?
No, and it shouldn't. USB is pretty darned flakey and loves to disconnect, there's also quite a bit of processing overhead when it comes to usb vs. an actual storage technology like sata or sas.
Apr 04, 2024 06:33 PM
155 Posts
Joined May 2017
cpgeekApr 04, 2024 06:33 PM
155 Posts
Quote from Nintendo1474 :
No, but you can run software raid. Windows Storage Spaces, StableBit DrivePool, ZFS if you're on Linux. AMD got some software renamed to StoreMI for them. Should all work fine
storemi will only work on amd's on-motherboard sata ports. it doesn't use usb (nor should it). windows storage spaces is a nightmare when it comes to overall reliability. I've heard of stablebit drivepool, but I haven't used it personally, I can't speak for it. I typically don't recommend trying to set up big reliable storage on windows, best to throw together a truenas box or buy an off-the-shelf nas so it can properly manage the storage, do scrubbing, and handle redundancy.
Apr 04, 2024 06:39 PM
703 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Nintendo1474Apr 04, 2024 06:39 PM
703 Posts
Quote from cpgeek :
storemi will only work on amd's on-motherboard sata ports. it doesn't use usb (nor should it). windows storage spaces is a nightmare when it comes to overall reliability. I've heard of stablebit drivepool, but I haven't used it personally, I can't speak for it. I typically don't recommend trying to set up big reliable storage on windows, best to throw together a truenas box or buy an off-the-shelf nas so it can properly manage the storage, do scrubbing, and handle redundancy.
Any source on the reliability claims of Storage Spaces?
Apr 04, 2024 06:46 PM
155 Posts
Joined May 2017
cpgeekApr 04, 2024 06:46 PM
155 Posts
Quote from cpc13 :
My source is 25 years in the IT industry running IT/compute infrastructure for companies ranging from a smaller tech company (~150 people, ~200 servers) to a large enterprise (~20k people, ~15k+ VMs running on ~2k servers) and various environments in between. My "source" is various colleagues and and former coworkers, industry conferences, and what is deployed our data centers.

Go into any decent data center and nearly every server in nearly every rack is going to have a pair of system/OS disks on hardware RAID1. Additionally, depending on the type of computing, it's going to be using hardware RAID for local disks if its making use of local storage, or it's going to be using SAN and/or NAS in some way (which will be using hardware RAID).

This is basic, cheap "insurance" to improve the reliability and robustness of a server. You don't want to lose a physical server because the OS drive fails. That's a huge waste of time and resources to recover. Instead, business buy their servers with paired OS drives so that when a drive fails, they just ping their hardware support vendor, have a replacement disk sent out, and they hot-swap the failed disk and let the hardware RAID1 automatically rebuild it.
if you're talking about WINDOWS servers, absolutely (and unfortunately there's a whole lot of them out there doing different things.) - the reason behind that is that windows (to the best of my knowledge) has really crappy software raid support so people just use hardware raid on those machines as a matter of course and that's totally reasonable still. - windows domain servers and whatnot are still quite popular and there's a whole set of people running windows servers for a large number of things (though I think most of those are being virtualized more and more and instead the virtualization system would do the appropriate software raid with stuff like vsan or using ceph or wekafs or a san with iscsi luns to a head that runs zfs or something like that, abstracting away the need for redundancy at the vm level. some folks still like windows on baremetal servers though, and so there are stll a few enterprise si's like dell and hp doing baremetal windows on hardware raid.

there's no way I would set up a linux, bsd, or virtualization server with hardware raid these days, however, as they support zfs, bcachefs, ceph, glusterfs, etc. which are all better approaches than traditional hardware raid due to improved reliability.
Apr 04, 2024 07:01 PM
155 Posts
Joined May 2017
cpgeekApr 04, 2024 07:01 PM
155 Posts

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 04, 2024 07:18 PM
703 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Nintendo1474Apr 04, 2024 07:18 PM
703 Posts
Most of what I'm reading here is referring to the horrible write speeds when using parity spaces. Which I agree with. It is farking terrible for that.

The ones that complain about reliability all seem to be 10 years old or older. We're on windows 11 now. I think they've fixed some of the problems at this point.

Maybe I'll try StoreMI instead. Thanks for the links.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals