Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | $539 |
39 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
![]() | $599.99 |
Rating: | (4 out of 5 stars) |
Reviews: | 871 Amazon Reviews |
Product Name: | SABRENT 10 Bay 3.5” SATA Hard Drive Tray Less Docking Station (USB 3.2 Type C and Type A) (DS-UCTB) |
Manufacturer: | SABRENT |
Model Number: | DS-UCTB |
Product SKU: | B09TV1XPDD |
UPC: | 840025252943 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
228 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
The Mini PCs we normally see listed max out with 2.5Gbps networking. So this would be able to keep up and saturate the pipe. If you needed more bandwidth, having separate direct SATA connections would be needed, likely with some type of external SAS connection.
10 drives is very large, unless you are going for extremely cheap small drives to fill the array. IMO it's better to use larger drives as each drive consumes power to run. UGreen has a Kickstarter going right now that has some really crazy deals for NASes that are supposed to ship in June. You might be more bang for your buck there.
Also, anyone thinking of using this many drives, Go with at least one parity disk, or even better two. The chance of data loss increases as you move to more and more drives. Not caring about movies on a single 10TB drive... fine. Not caring about 180TB, that's going to be a much larger pain to replace everything.
I was checking what level of support it has from Sabrent (zero, they have really gone downhill with firmware updates) and there's a thread about how it doesn't have automatic power recovery to bring the drives back up after power loss.
actually, i am not even sure of the reference? but sabrent is very well known in ssd and pc component business for the last 5-10 years
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
That's a lot of work.
Give comskip a try, it auto identifies the commercials. You can then use other programs to cut out just the commercials before you do your re-encode. But it might be best to review what it's doing, it's always possible something isn't detected right and starts deleting things it shouldn't.
https://github.com/erikkaashoek/Comskip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMNoyim
That video shows Plex running, it's using the Plus version of the 4 bay, but base N100 version will also work. I use an N100 Mini PC for to run Plex right now.
No, but you can run software raid. Windows Storage Spaces, StableBit DrivePool, ZFS if you're on Linux. Should all work fine.
I guess StoreMI doesn't do USB storage, oh well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l55GfAw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_JOtEB
Go into any decent data center and nearly every server in nearly every rack is going to have a pair of system/OS disks on hardware RAID1. Additionally, depending on the type of computing, it's going to be using hardware RAID for local disks if its making use of local storage, or it's going to be using SAN and/or NAS in some way (which will be using hardware RAID).
This is basic, cheap "insurance" to improve the reliability and robustness of a server. You don't want to lose a physical server because the OS drive fails. That's a huge waste of time and resources to recover. Instead, business buy their servers with paired OS drives so that when a drive fails, they just ping their hardware support vendor, have a replacement disk sent out, and they hot-swap the failed disk and let the hardware RAID1 automatically rebuild it.
Called it in another comment. Every time, without fail.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMNoyim
That video shows Plex running, it's using the Plus version of the 4 bay, but base N100 version will also work. I use an N100 Mini PC for to run Plex right now.
For just a basic NAS and Plex, it's not needed.
Go into any decent data center and nearly every server in nearly every rack is going to have a pair of system/OS disks on hardware RAID1. Additionally, depending on the type of computing, it's going to be using hardware RAID for local disks if its making use of local storage, or it's going to be using SAN and/or NAS in some way (which will be using hardware RAID).
This is basic, cheap "insurance" to improve the reliability and robustness of a server. You don't want to lose a physical server because the OS drive fails. That's a huge waste of time and resources to recover. Instead, business buy their servers with paired OS drives so that when a drive fails, they just ping their hardware support vendor, have a replacement disk sent out, and they hot-swap the failed disk and let the hardware RAID1 automatically rebuild it.
Ah, so your source is your own ass. I see.
I am also an IT professional with 25 years of experience in doing all the things you said. I also have various colleagues and former coworkers who have told me things about IT. And we all agree that you're wrong.
There, now we are on equal footing in that regard. But I'm still ahead in terms of visible, researchable links to proof.
I don't use Google, not a fan of their data privacy practices. Also they've really gone downhill recently. I switched to DuckDuckGo.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Any source on the reliability claims of Storage Spaces?