Participating Subaru Dealerships [
dealership locator] have
2023 Subaru Solterra Electric Compact SUV (Premium Trim, code PED-11) available to
Lease at
$241/month for
36 months (total $8,676) plus tax and license fee from participating dealerships w/ zero down for qualified buyers. Contact your local dealership(s) to verify if this offer is available in your area.
Thanks to community member
KhalidS8701 for finding this deal.
- Note: Offer and inventory availability may vary by location.
Features:
- All-wheel-drive electric crossover
- Seats five and carries 23.8 cubic feet of cargo behind its rear seats.
- Range: 228 miles
- 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds
- 8.3" of ground clearance
- Built on Toyota's e-TGNA global battery-electric vehicle platform
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
1,194 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Manufacturer Offer. MSRP $46,220 (incl. $1,225 freight charge). Net cap cost of $31,795 (incl. $295 acq. fee). Total monthly payments are $8,676. Lease end purchase option is $26,345. Must take delivery from retailer stock by April 30, 2024. Other leases available on other trim levels. Cannot be combined with any other coupon, direct/email offer, or promotional offer unless allowed by that offer. Special lease rates extended to well-qualified buyers. Subject to credit approval, vehicle insurance approval, & vehicle availability. Not all buyers may qualify. Payments may be higher in some states. Net cap cost & monthly payment excludes tax, license, title, registration, insurance, additional options, & retailer charges. Retailer participation may affect actual payment. At lease end, lessee is responsible for vehicle maintenance & repairs not covered by warranty, excessive wear & tear, 15 cents per mile over 10,000 miles/year and $300 disposition fee. Lessee pays personal property & ad valorem taxes (where applicable) & insurance. Offer not available in Hawaii. See participating retailer for details."
Lease Details: ** Now through April 30, 2024, lease a new 2023 Solterra for $329 per month on a 36-month lease (Premium trim, code PED-11). $329 due at lease signing. $0 security deposit. Inventory may be limited. Manufacturer offer. MSRP $46,220 (incl. $1,225 freight charge). Net cap cost of $34,795 (incl. $295 acq. Fee). Total monthly payments are $11,844. Lease end purchase option is $26,345. Must take delivery from retailer stock by April 30, 2024. Other leases available on other trim levels. Cannot be combined with any other coupon, direct/email offer, or promotional offer unless allowed by that offer. Special lease rates extended to well-qualified buyers. Subject to credit approval, vehicle insurance approval, & vehicle availability. Not all buyers may qualify. Payments may be higher in some states. Net cap cost & monthly payment excludes tax, license, title, registration, insurance, additional options, & retailer charges. Retailer participation may affect actual payment. At lease end, lessee is responsible for vehicle maintenance & repairs not covered by warranty, excessive wear & tear, 15 cents per mile over 10,000 miles per year, and $300 disposition fee. Lessee pays personal property & ad valorem taxes (where applicable) & insurance. Offer not available in Hawaii. See participating retailer for details.
Does it ever occur to any of you that YOUR personal benefit is not the only reason we are trying to move as a country away from oil?
Personally, I'd like to see us reduce oil dependency and have a country with energy independence so we can let the middle east sort out their own problems.
Remember the good old days, like 2010, when we all agreed that energy independence was good (BEFORE the modern age of hyper-partisan politics, YouTube soundbites, and no progress on anything).
Now we all forget that part when we talk about EV's
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Knightshade
No actual study using actual science claims that though.
Here's 3 to get you started-
https://about.bnef.com/blog/no-do...y%20charge.
https://www.factcheck.o
It's really not, at all, a disputed point by anyone interested in honest discussion.
Lemme guess, you're parroting the insane tire thing already debunked at least twice in the thread.
I wish the anti-EV folks would at least find new lies to tell.
Here's 3 to get you started-
https://about.bnef.com/blog/no-do...y%20charge.
https://www.reuters.com/business/...021-06-29/
Which for the typical driver is just over one year of use... and the ICE keeps getting worse cumulatively for all the 10+ years both likely remain in service.
https://www.factcheck.o
In one of the studies cited in this link they measure it as 19,500 miles befroe the cradle to grave total emissions from an ICE car would be greater than an EV- and again keep getting worse for the ICE car the longer beyond that both are driven.
It's really not, at all, a disputed point by anyone interested in honest discussion.
Lemme guess, you're parroting the insane tire thing already debunked at least twice in the thread.
I wish the anti-EV folks would at least find new lies to tell.
https://www.emissionsan
using biased legacy, propoganda "fact checking" media that is behind the push for EVs is pretty a pretty sorry source for your claims.
these bogus fact checkers will make up things that nobody said to mix in with claims so that they can say false, this is how they classically work when there is something they don't like.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Here's 3 to get you started-
https://about.bnef.com/blog/no-do...y%20charge.
https://www.reuters.com/business/...021-06-29/
Which for the typical driver is just over one year of use... and the ICE keeps getting worse cumulatively for all the 10+ years both likely remain in service.
https://www.factcheck.o
In one of the studies cited in this link they measure it as 19,500 miles befroe the cradle to grave total emissions from an ICE car would be greater than an EV- and again keep getting worse for the ICE car the longer beyond that both are driven.
It's really not, at all, a disputed point by anyone interested in honest discussion.
Lemme guess, you're parroting the insane tire thing already debunked at least twice in the thread.
I wish the anti-EV folks would at least find new lies to tell.
https://nypost.com/2024/03/05/bus...ent-study/
This thread should really just be deleted.
With seatbelts and airbag you could reasonably expect to survive a crash at 45 mph. I don't seen hydrogen tanks surviving that unless they put so much armor plating that the car weighs more than my mother-in-law.
Here's an eye-opening video of a van with pressurized LNG tank exploding. This happened a few years ago not far from where I live, I remember seeing it on the news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO055g6
No.... it wasn't.
As was explained/debunked twice previously in this very thread.
The "results" are impossible from a scientific perspective.
But since I guess you couldn't be bothered to read the debunking the first 2 times, third time is a charm!
https://cleantechnica.c
Typical tires of course last 20-40 times longer than that.
Dr. McTurk suggests the cause of the errors in your "study" (apart from not bothering to do basic math on the mass of a tire) are that the Emissions Analytics study was accidentally measuring particulate matter emitted by other cars, that had settled on the road and then been kicked up by the tyres of the test car, rather than what was being shed from the tyres of the car undergoing the test
And beyond that of course it's not like gas cars don't use tires either.
For people who don't leave town much, EVs seem like an excellent option, with the biggest downside being battery replacement costs down the road. On a lease deal this attractive, though, this is a no brainer for people driving less than 100 miles a day.
There's one political party that is now Anti-EV's. They were NOT this way before, in fact they were all for strategic "energy independence" for the USA. But now, many of their re-election campaigns are funded by the oil and gas industry who want them to make EV's seem as unappealing as possible.
That's why when someone brags about an EV, the ownership experience, or the performance...they must be a "certain party", because only "that party" likes EV's and alternate energy sources.
So it's not a discussion of EV's, and their pro's and con's, it's a political badge that people are labeled with (or wear proudly on their own). That's what makes this EV topic so stupid, it's just ANOTHER masked political discussion full of fear and stupid soundbites.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment