Walmart has Slumberjack Backpacking Packs on sale from $41.50 as listed below. Shipping is free w/ Walmart+ (free trial available) or on orders $35+, otherwise select free store pickup where stock permits.
Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Thanks to Deal Hunter niki4h for finding this deal.
Ready to take your hiking to the next level? The Slumberjack Trail Ridge 50 Liter Backpacking Pack is the perfect place to start. Load it up with everything you need for a memorable overnight on the trail. The main compartment top loads to pack in all the essentials and that extra sandwich too. Adjust the torso to fit you just right and stay comfy with padded shoulder straps that ease the load. The waist belt is also padded and has a convenient zipped pocket. Staying hydrated is important so the pack is hydration reservoir compatible and features a side water bottle pocket. Clip extra gear to the daisy chains and attach your trekking poles with the custom attachments. You’ll discover more great features every time you head out with the Trail Ridge on your back.
Product SKU:
733084191
UPC:
636533114893
Community Notes
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Walmart has Slumberjack Backpacking Packs on sale from $41.50 as listed below. Shipping is free w/ Walmart+ (free trial available) or on orders $35+, otherwise select free store pickup where stock permits.
Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Thanks to Deal Hunter niki4h for finding this deal.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
50L = 3.5# empty
65L = 4.75# empty
Coming from the 200D material used mostly. (I.e. backpack canvas)
Not for your trekking types for sure, but appears like a pretty decent starter pack for a new Boy scout (50L), however there is no way to "fit" this pack as the back straps are not height adjustable, meaning they'll grow out of it. But at this price, you can just pass it along to someone else.
The Slumberjack backpack "lifetime" warranty has all sorts of qualifiers/limitations, but that might be the case to weed out egregious abusers.
Anyone have warranty experience with them? Lifetime warranty from reputable company very important in backpack I think. (Jansport is stellar, think Outdoor Products very good, too.)
Also compare this similar, and well-rated pack, with caveat that straps not height adjustable causing problems for taller men (this might also be case with featured Slumberjack):
The Slumberjack backpack "lifetime" warranty has all sorts of qualifiers/limitations, but that might be the case to weed out egregious abusers.
Anyone have warranty experience with them? Lifetime warranty from reputable company very important in backpack I think. (Jansport is stellar, think Outdoor Products very good, too.)
Also compare this similar, and well-rated pack, with caveat that straps not height adjustable causing problems for taller men (this might also be case with featured Slumberjack):
I agree with you. But after comparing the two i feel like Slumberjack is a bit well made than OP backpack. The OP packpack is also much lighter and smaller even though it supposedly only 3 liters smaller than Slumberjack. For me the better hassle free warranty would be the only plus point for OP backpack in this case
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Apr 7, 2024 4:21 PM
1.4K Comments
Joined Oct 2007
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.
I agree with you. But after comparing the two i feel like Slumberjack is a bit well made than OP backpack. The OP packpack is also much lighter and smaller even though it supposedly only 3 liters smaller than Slumberjack. For me the better hassle free warranty would be the only plus point for OP backpack in this case
I'm not an expert in this area, but I'm pretty certain that *lighter* weight backpacks are generally coveted by enthusiasts and command higher prices (have strong, lightweight, "high-tech" materials). 3.5 lbs. (Slumberjack) is quite a bit of weight, come to think of it. This specific Outdoor Products pack is quite durable (from personal experience), but Slumberjack may be as good or better. Consider ordering both, return one, 90 days to do so @ Walmart.
Last edited by Blindsorrow April 7, 2024 at 05:46 PM.
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Translation: "#" = "pounds" (weight)
I felt the argument of # meaning LBS was daft it was used and a designation for pounds for a long time before it was know as a hashtag lol. Sometimes the arguments on SD are more entertaining then actual items we are hunting lol.
9
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Translation: "#" = "pounds" (weight)
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
33 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
65L = 4.75# empty
Coming from the 200D material used mostly. (I.e. backpack canvas)
Not for your trekking types for sure, but appears like a pretty decent starter pack for a new Boy scout (50L), however there is no way to "fit" this pack as the back straps are not height adjustable, meaning they'll grow out of it. But at this price, you can just pass it along to someone else.
3.5 lb
Assembled Product Dimensions (L x W x H)
10.25 x 12.60 x 26.75 Inches
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://slumberjack.com/trail-ridge-50/
The Slumberjack backpack "lifetime" warranty has all sorts of qualifiers/limitations, but that might be the case to weed out egregious abusers.
Anyone have warranty experience with them? Lifetime warranty from reputable company very important in backpack I think. (Jansport is stellar, think Outdoor Products very good, too.)
Also compare this similar, and well-rated pack, with caveat that straps not height adjustable causing problems for taller men (this might also be case with featured Slumberjack):
Outdoor Products Arrowhead 47 L Hiking Backpack, Rucksack, Unisex, Green, Adult, Teen, Polyester https://www.walmart.com/ip/722065632
https://slumberjack.com/trail-ridge-50/
The Slumberjack backpack "lifetime" warranty has all sorts of qualifiers/limitations, but that might be the case to weed out egregious abusers.
Anyone have warranty experience with them? Lifetime warranty from reputable company very important in backpack I think. (Jansport is stellar, think Outdoor Products very good, too.)
Also compare this similar, and well-rated pack, with caveat that straps not height adjustable causing problems for taller men (this might also be case with featured Slumberjack):
Outdoor Products Arrowhead 47 L Hiking Backpack, Rucksack, Unisex, Green, Adult, Teen, Polyester https://www.walmart.com/ip/722065632
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Translation: "#" = "pounds" (weight)
Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)
Translation: "#" = "pounds" (weight)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!