Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expirediconian | Staff posted Jun 20, 2024 06:08 PM
expirediconian | Staff posted Jun 20, 2024 06:08 PM

Canon Refurbished Lenses: EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM $499, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

& More + Free Shipping

$149

$320

53% off
Canon
78 Comments 40,798 Views
Visit Canon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Canon has select Canon Refurbished Lenses on sale below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

Available:

Editor's Notes

Written by SubZero5 | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Canon has select Canon Refurbished Lenses on sale below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

Available:

Editor's Notes

Written by SubZero5 | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+53
Good Deal
Visit Canon

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

jax4ever2
264 Posts
74 Reputation
Brand new
LavenderPickle7682
3901 Posts
623 Reputation
I would stick with whatever you have (most likely a mobile phone).

These are expensive cameras and lenses, and you should have a minimum level of understanding of the basics of photography before dropping serious coin on them. They aren't magical "take perfect picture" machines -- though there are automatic modes, if you don't know what you're doing, you'll probably get worse results than from one's mobile phone.

I'm not trying to gatekeep them or exclude anyone from learning -- but it'd be a dang shame for someone to drop hundreds if not thousands of dollars, and be disappointed with the end results only because they didn't take the time to understand what they were buying.
phrankiephotog
94 Posts
10 Reputation
that EF 50 1.4 looks mighty tasty. methinks it would be great for my flower photos, and i must pull the trigger.

77 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 22, 2024 12:18 AM
1,247 Posts
Joined Mar 2017
11AJun 22, 2024 12:18 AM
1,247 Posts
Quote from lpp123 :
How's the quality of the refurbished lens from Canon?
These are most likely returns. I bought four refurbished lenses from Canon in the past. One looked new. A couple had signs of light wear on the barrell if you looked. One had some splattered liquid on the front glass. I probably could have cleaned it off. I didn't try. I returned that one.
1
Jun 22, 2024 12:21 AM
1,247 Posts
Joined Mar 2017
11AJun 22, 2024 12:21 AM
1,247 Posts
Quote from jax4ever2 :
Brand new
I know all of us want to believe this. And some of them may actually be brand new.

In my experience, these are most likely returns. I bought four refurbished lenses from Canon in the past. One looked brand new. A couple had signs of light wear on the barrell if you looked. One had some splattered liquid on the front glass. I probably could have cleaned it off. I didn't try. I returned that one.​

Nothing wrong with returns, of course. You'll have the same wear on them after a month of use anyway. Refurb does not impact resale value.
Jun 22, 2024 12:26 AM
254 Posts
Joined Dec 2006
sfooJun 22, 2024 12:26 AM
254 Posts
Quote from anatiob :
It is an awesome lens. Focus is so fast and you can get f1.0 in right conditions.
The 50mm F1.4 is also known for breaking focus motors.
Jun 22, 2024 01:13 AM
978 Posts
Joined Feb 2017
theshopper2022Jun 22, 2024 01:13 AM
978 Posts
Pulled the trigger on the 10-22. Better not be cheaper next month
Jun 22, 2024 01:43 AM
71 Posts
Joined Oct 2019
FinnsDad662Jun 22, 2024 01:43 AM
71 Posts
24-70 is a steal. Thanks OP
Jun 22, 2024 03:29 AM
116 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Weston78Jun 22, 2024 03:29 AM
116 Posts
That EF 100-400 L series for $1099 was an absolute steal for anyone who got it, I paid a lot more than that for mine a few years ago, its by far the lens I use most.
Jun 22, 2024 12:20 PM
82 Posts
Joined Nov 2016
weekendballJun 22, 2024 12:20 PM
82 Posts
Quote from sfoo :
The 50mm F1.4 is also known for breaking focus motors.
This is very true. Happened to mine so I am buying a refurbished replacement. My everyday lens.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 22, 2024 03:43 PM
272 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
lurking4dealsJun 22, 2024 03:43 PM
272 Posts
Quote from Weston78 :
That EF 100-400 L series for $1099 was an absolute steal for anyone who got it, I paid a lot more than that for mine a few years ago, its by far the lens I use most.
How is it compared to the 70-200 F2.8 L? I just upgraded from a 7D to an R8. The 200 was perfect on a cropped sensor, now that I'm on a full, 200mm might not be long enough. I bought a used 1.4x but that takes me to F4 anyway, I was wondering if the 100 -400 would be a better option.
Jun 22, 2024 10:42 PM
875 Posts
Joined Jul 2008
wlderdudeJun 22, 2024 10:42 PM
875 Posts
Quote from lurking4deals :
How is it compared to the 70-200 F2.8 L? I just upgraded from a 7D to an R8. The 200 was perfect on a cropped sensor, now that I'm on a full, 200mm might not be long enough. I bought a used 1.4x but that takes me to F4 anyway, I was wondering if the 100 -400 would be a better option.
That's of course going to depend on what you are trying to photograph. There's clearly a lot of overlap in focal length. As a wildlife lens, the 100-400 is kind of awesome. For events like weddings, it's a little too tight and slow to be ideal, but it does get the job done. I've used it in that role once, and it did fine. As a sports lens, the 100-400 has some merit, but so does a 70-200mm.

If you love your 70-200 2.8 and would only use the 100-400 at the 400mm focal length, maybe consider a 400mm prime. Primes take telconverters much better than zooms. It will be more difficult to shoot with since you can't zoom out to get what you want in frame, but it is a lot less weight. The cost difference might be there in normal times, but with sale on. . .
Jun 22, 2024 10:48 PM
875 Posts
Joined Jul 2008
wlderdudeJun 22, 2024 10:48 PM
875 Posts
How about that. The ancient EF 85mm 1.8 and the flashy new RF 85mm 2.0 are both $400.
Jun 23, 2024 01:05 AM
35 Posts
Joined Sep 2017
woutgeoJun 23, 2024 01:05 AM
35 Posts
Quote from wlderdude :
How about that. The ancient EF 85mm 1.8 and the flashy new RF 85mm 2.0 are both $400.
f stops are expensive!
Jun 23, 2024 05:28 AM
272 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
lurking4dealsJun 23, 2024 05:28 AM
272 Posts
Quote from wlderdude :
That's of course going to depend on what you are trying to photograph. There's clearly a lot of overlap in focal length. As a wildlife lens, the 100-400 is kind of awesome. For events like weddings, it's a little too tight and slow to be ideal, but it does get the job done. I've used it in that role once, and it did fine. As a sports lens, the 100-400 has some merit, but so does a 70-200mm.

If you love your 70-200 2.8 and would only use the 100-400 at the 400mm focal length, maybe consider a 400mm prime. Primes take telconverters much better than zooms. It will be more difficult to shoot with since you can't zoom out to get what you want in frame, but it is a lot less weight. The cost difference might be there in normal times, but with sale on. . .
Thanks. This would be for kids soccer games. I shot mostly at 200mm on the crop so that's like 320mm? I'll take a look at the 400mm prime.
Jun 23, 2024 12:44 PM
690 Posts
Joined Dec 2022
FairTeam939Jun 23, 2024 12:44 PM
690 Posts
Quote from anatiob :
LIt is an awesome lens. Focus is so fast and you can get f1.0 in right conditions.
LOL, how do you get f1.0 from a f1.4 lens?

now that is quite a Trick, and kind of funny too. but we need comedians in photography. thanks.
Jun 23, 2024 12:58 PM
690 Posts
Joined Dec 2022
FairTeam939Jun 23, 2024 12:58 PM
690 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
I would stick with whatever you have (most likely a mobile phone).

These are expensive cameras and lenses, and you should have a minimum level of understanding of the basics of photography before dropping serious coin on them. They aren't magical "take perfect picture" machines -- though there are automatic modes, if you don't know what you're doing, you'll probably get worse results than from one's mobile phone.

I'm not trying to gatekeep them or exclude anyone from learning -- but it'd be a dang shame for someone to drop hundreds if not thousands of dollars, and be disappointed with the end results only because they didn't take the time to understand what they were buying.
good advice.
your average person is NOT a photographer and may not have much Creativity to use these cameras. i have seen this where a lady buys expensive cameras and a pile of lens and now she is a 'photographer'.

i asked her about simple settings she might use on the camera, and she had no clue. she put the camera on automatic and hoped for the best.

maybe most people are like this, hard to say. they could learn from a book or YouTube, but prolly not. too busy watching Crap on television, which should not even be in a home, but there they are. especially with kids, please get rid of those things and wifi, but i digress.

agree, cameras are not 'magic machines' LOL; if you don't want to learn stay away. like a piano, it can play beautiful music, but on average in most homes it never will.

there are Boat Loads of used DSLR cameras for 50 bucks, start with that and learn. if not, then don't bother, because i will be buying your expensive Wazoo camera in a few years very cheap, because you find out it is not a 'magic camera'. LOL
2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 23, 2024 12:59 PM
690 Posts
Joined Dec 2022
FairTeam939Jun 23, 2024 12:59 PM
690 Posts
Quote from rustum :
It was $1299 during holiday sale.
maybe 35mm or 40mm or the kit lens?

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals