This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
This didn't really answer my question, and I am just really curious to what the difference would be other than the price. All things equal, how would a very expensive processor that uses the same room correction software (in this case Dirac) be better than a receiver using all preouts to the same amps and speakers.
In my experience
A better pre/ pro is more musical sounding if that matter to you
I listen to 2 channel audio running Pure direct and I could tell a difference in the Marantz prepro I used to have versus the Arcam that took its place.
I tested this extensively before I even ran room correction.
I think Dirac sounds better
If you are the type that listens to 2 channel audio with room correction engaged and matrixes audio it may not matter to you
Specifically to the two pre/ pros I had I noticed the Arcam had more sound specific customization options versus the Marantz
If you have 11 speaker setup, all are full range/reference & you want it all in one box, yes this may be a good choice.
If that's not the case for any of those, there are many less expensive AVRs with preouts that can process 11 channels that could do the job.
As an example:
Denon 3800 has all the features this has(minus Dirac Live being an option) + 2 more independent sub outs and all 11 channels has independent preamp mode.
Even this only lets you turn off L&R fronts OR all channels.
The 3800 has dropped down to $900, even adding Dirac Live to it for $350 now.
There is no other AVR or pre pro that comes close to that performance.
I guess what I am asking is, let's say all the amps and speakers are the same. Calibrated by the same professional calibration. Using the same Dirac live. How much better would a trinnov processor be compared to this onkyo?
The Trinnov or Storm Audio Processor is in a completely different league as it starts to support Wide and height channels. Also it's room correction with that many channels is significantly better than what you get with most receivers. Even the Marantz AV10 in my theater was less impactful than the Trinnov in the same space.
All that being said you need to have the space and speakers to include multiple subs (near field and front) to be able to really stretch the trinnov or Storm Audio units.
If you have 11 speaker setup, all are full range/reference & you want it all in one box, yes this may be a good choice.
If that's not the case for any of those, there are many less expensive AVRs with preouts that can process 11 channels that could do the job.
As an example:
Denon 3800 has all the features this has(minus Dirac Live being an option) + 2 more independent sub outs and all 11 channels has independent preamp mode.
Even this only lets you turn off L&R fronts OR all channels.
The 3800 has dropped down to $900, even adding Dirac Live to it for $350 now.
There is no other AVR or pre pro that comes close to that performance.
Audiophiles, would you recommend this receiver, A6A, 3800h, 4800h for the following setup:
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Audiophiles, would you recommend this receiver, A6A, 3800h, 4800h for the following setup:
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Any advice would be super appreciated!
Yes, but if you plan to go all the way to Dirac Live Bass Control, you're better off getting the 3800 and still come out ahead paying for DL and DLBC (especially near BF).
Audiophiles, would you recommend this receiver, A6A, 3800h, 4800h for the following setup:
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Any advice would be super appreciated!
Gave my opinion in the A8A post, refer there.
1
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
For anyone using this unit, you should know that there are 2 levels of user web interface.
first you enter your IP address. the manual has the standard login (admin - user and password), but there is a higher level of customization available, the logon is ciuser for user / password.
In the video, AA only says If you have DLBC, skip DLBM (yes, a literal "touch").
If you're upgrading from an RZ50 to an RZ70 (or a Pioneer 505 to the 805), it may not be obvious to adjust the crossover in DLBM since those cheaper models lack it!
In the video, AA only says If you have DLBC, skip DLBM (yes, a literal "touch").
If you're upgrading from an RZ50 to an RZ70 (or a Pioneer 505 to the 805), it may not be obvious to adjust the crossover in DLBM since those cheaper models lack it!
Correct, he's pointing out IF whatever your AVR offers/includes(of the 3) that is what you get.
He's pointing out the only difference between DL & DLBM is you can adjust your crossovers within DL over doing it manually.
If you follow his earlier advice in the video "which is very popular" to manually set your crossovers at 80, this difference is pretty much moot.
As he explains if you have DLBC this is all moot.
As Dirac explains in plain not generic English in their only user manual what DLBC offers.
In basic terms:
With DL it harmonize the subwoofers and non-subwoofer speakers in the lower frequencies using tailor-made phase filters, delays, and gains and it will consider any destructive interference between the speakers.
That video pretty much explains all this, after all he worked directly with Dirac!
Correct, he's pointing out IF whatever your AVR offers/includes(of the 3) that is what you get.
He's pointing out the only difference between DL & DLBM is you can adjust your crossovers within DL over doing it manually.
If you follow his earlier advice in the video "which is very popular" to manually set your crossovers at 80, this difference is pretty much moot.
As he explains if you have DLBC this is all moot.
As Dirac explains in plain not generic English in their only user manual what DLBC offers.
In basic terms:
With DL it harmonize the subwoofers and non-subwoofer speakers in the lower frequencies using tailor-made phase filters, delays, and gains and it will consider any destructive interference between the speakers.
That video pretty much explains all this, after all he worked directly with Dirac!
It appears no vendor is going to tell you this but if you have DLBM and don't have DLBC, it's far better to do the crossover assignment in Dirac vs giving the AVR full crossover control for the following reasons:
1) In Dirac, you can see where the upper frequencies of your SW and lower frequencies of your surrounds cross over and make the adjustment based on that visual cue. On the AVR side, you're just guessing what that point is!
2) The Dirac filter will be transferred to the AVR with all speaker assignments made and everything level-matched. If you choose to set the crossover only in the AVR, the AVR is blind to information in Dirac (that a full filter would have provided) and is fully independent (for better or for worse)!
It appears no vendor is going to tell you this but if you have DLBM and don't have DLBC, it's far better to do the crossover assignment in Dirac vs giving the AVR full crossover control for the following reasons:
1) In Dirac, you can see where the upper frequencies of your SW and lower frequencies of your surrounds cross over and make the adjustment based on that visual cue. On the AVR side, you're just guessing what that point is!
2) The Dirac filter will be transferred to the AVR with all speaker assignments made and everything level-matched. If you choose to set the crossover only in the AVR, the AVR is blind to information in Dirac (that a full filter would have provided) and is fully independent (for better or for worse)!
Correct a knowledgeable vendor won't tell you that!
Again in plain English and in the video, you set the crossovers prior to running Dirac Live.
Dirac Live(nor DLBM) does not do that for you ahead of time!
All DLBM does different, it lets you adjust the crossover in Dirac afterward and gives you a visual.
It does not do any other "extra" whatever correction you're claiming!
Correct a knowledgeable vendor won't tell you that!
Again in plain English and in the video, you set the crossovers prior to running Dirac Live.
Dirac Live(nor DLBM) does not do that for you ahead of time!
All DLBM does different, it lets you adjust the crossover in Dirac afterward and gives you a visual.
It does not do any other "extra" whatever correction you're claiming!
I see you are undermining the usefulness of DLBM. Are you part of some "damage control" task force? Normal customers don't typically take offense at the existence of DLBM!
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
if you don't need / want those features, then the RZ50 is a very good 2nd choice at a much more affordable price.
51 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
A better pre/ pro is more musical sounding if that matter to you
I listen to 2 channel audio running Pure direct and I could tell a difference in the Marantz prepro I used to have versus the Arcam that took its place.
I tested this extensively before I even ran room correction.
I think Dirac sounds better
If you are the type that listens to 2 channel audio with room correction engaged and matrixes audio it may not matter to you
Specifically to the two pre/ pros I had I noticed the Arcam had more sound specific customization options versus the Marantz
If that's not the case for any of those, there are many less expensive AVRs with preouts that can process 11 channels that could do the job.
As an example:
Denon 3800 has all the features this has(minus Dirac Live being an option) + 2 more independent sub outs and all 11 channels has independent preamp mode.
Even this only lets you turn off L&R fronts OR all channels.
The 3800 has dropped down to $900, even adding Dirac Live to it for $350 now.
There is no other AVR or pre pro that comes close to that performance.
No different how people waited for this to go to $1999.
All that being said you need to have the space and speakers to include multiple subs (near field and front) to be able to really stretch the trinnov or Storm Audio units.
If that's not the case for any of those, there are many less expensive AVRs with preouts that can process 11 channels that could do the job.
As an example:
Denon 3800 has all the features this has(minus Dirac Live being an option) + 2 more independent sub outs and all 11 channels has independent preamp mode.
Even this only lets you turn off L&R fronts OR all channels.
The 3800 has dropped down to $900, even adding Dirac Live to it for $350 now.
There is no other AVR or pre pro that comes close to that performance.
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Any advice would be super appreciated!
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Any advice would be super appreciated!
2x Martin Logan 60 xti
Center 50 xti
2x surround motion 2i
Descend 12 sub
Kube 12 sub
Any advice would be super appreciated!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
first you enter your IP address. the manual has the standard login (admin - user and password), but there is a higher level of customization available, the logon is ciuser for user / password.
Here is probably the best video that covers the optimal way to use Dirac Live(for any brand).
This renowned AV Professional worked directly with Dirac for all these great tips, common confusing questions and issues.
He even touches on the other two RCs Dirac offers(Bass Management & Bass Control) and what they offer besides Dirac Live.
This is universal, there is no separate user guide per brand.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gjWZUZ1
Here is probably the best video that covers the optimal way to use Dirac Live(for any brand).
This renowned AV Professional worked directly with Dirac for all these great tips, common confusing questions and issues.
He even touches on the other two RCs Dirac offers(Bass Management & Bass Control) and what they offer besides Dirac Live.
This is universal, there is no separate user guide per brand.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gjWZUZ1
If you're upgrading from an RZ50 to an RZ70 (or a Pioneer 505 to the 805), it may not be obvious to adjust the crossover in DLBM since those cheaper models lack it!
If you're upgrading from an RZ50 to an RZ70 (or a Pioneer 505 to the 805), it may not be obvious to adjust the crossover in DLBM since those cheaper models lack it!
He's pointing out the only difference between DL & DLBM is you can adjust your crossovers within DL over doing it manually.
If you follow his earlier advice in the video "which is very popular" to manually set your crossovers at 80, this difference is pretty much moot.
As he explains if you have DLBC this is all moot.
As Dirac explains in plain not generic English in their only user manual what DLBC offers.
In basic terms:
With DL it harmonize the subwoofers and non-subwoofer speakers in the lower frequencies using tailor-made phase filters, delays, and gains and it will consider any destructive interference between the speakers.
That video pretty much explains all this, after all he worked directly with Dirac!
He's pointing out the only difference between DL & DLBM is you can adjust your crossovers within DL over doing it manually.
If you follow his earlier advice in the video "which is very popular" to manually set your crossovers at 80, this difference is pretty much moot.
As he explains if you have DLBC this is all moot.
As Dirac explains in plain not generic English in their only user manual what DLBC offers.
In basic terms:
With DL it harmonize the subwoofers and non-subwoofer speakers in the lower frequencies using tailor-made phase filters, delays, and gains and it will consider any destructive interference between the speakers.
That video pretty much explains all this, after all he worked directly with Dirac!
1) In Dirac, you can see where the upper frequencies of your SW and lower frequencies of your surrounds cross over and make the adjustment based on that visual cue. On the AVR side, you're just guessing what that point is!
2) The Dirac filter will be transferred to the AVR with all speaker assignments made and everything level-matched. If you choose to set the crossover only in the AVR, the AVR is blind to information in Dirac (that a full filter would have provided) and is fully independent (for better or for worse)!
1) In Dirac, you can see where the upper frequencies of your SW and lower frequencies of your surrounds cross over and make the adjustment based on that visual cue. On the AVR side, you're just guessing what that point is!
2) The Dirac filter will be transferred to the AVR with all speaker assignments made and everything level-matched. If you choose to set the crossover only in the AVR, the AVR is blind to information in Dirac (that a full filter would have provided) and is fully independent (for better or for worse)!
Again in plain English and in the video, you set the crossovers prior to running Dirac Live.
Dirac Live(nor DLBM) does not do that for you ahead of time!
All DLBM does different, it lets you adjust the crossover in Dirac afterward and gives you a visual.
It does not do any other "extra" whatever correction you're claiming!
Here is the manual AGAIN, in plain English!
https://www.dirac.com/wp-content/...Manual.pdf
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Again in plain English and in the video, you set the crossovers prior to running Dirac Live.
Dirac Live(nor DLBM) does not do that for you ahead of time!
All DLBM does different, it lets you adjust the crossover in Dirac afterward and gives you a visual.
It does not do any other "extra" whatever correction you're claiming!
Here is the manual AGAIN, in plain English!
https://www.dirac.com/wp-content/...Manual.pdf [dirac.com]
Leave a Comment