Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredSuryasis posted Sep 06, 2024 04:11 AM
expiredSuryasis posted Sep 06, 2024 04:11 AM

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 14" 2.8K OLED, 64GB RAM, 1TB SSD

+ Free Shipping

$1,079

$2,669

59% off
Lenovo
126 Comments 63,320 Views
Visit Lenovo
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Lenovo has Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 Mobile Workstation Laptop (21ME001MUS) on sale for $2669 - $1550 when you apply eCoupon code WSDEAL8 - $40 when you apply eCoupon code BUYMORELENOVO = $1079. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member Suryasis for finding this deal.

Note: Be sure to replace the code that is applied by default with both of the codes listed above.

Specs:
  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 8-Core Processor
  • 14" 2.8K 2880x1800 OLED 100%DCI-P3 400 nits 120Hz Display
  • 64GB DDR5-5600MHz SODIMM (2 x 32GB) Memory
  • 1TB SSD M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 Performance TLC Opal
  • Integrated AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
  • Backlit Keyboard
  • Wi-Fi 6E NFA725A 2x2 AX + Bluetooth 5.3
  • Windows 11 Pro
  • Ports:
    • 2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 w/ Power Delivery 3.0 & DisplayPort 1.4
    • 2x USB-A Gbps
    • 1x HDMI 2.1
    • 1x Audio Combo Jack

Editor's Notes

Written by oceanlake

Original Post

Written by Suryasis
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Lenovo has Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 Mobile Workstation Laptop (21ME001MUS) on sale for $2669 - $1550 when you apply eCoupon code WSDEAL8 - $40 when you apply eCoupon code BUYMORELENOVO = $1079. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member Suryasis for finding this deal.

Note: Be sure to replace the code that is applied by default with both of the codes listed above.

Specs:
  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 8-Core Processor
  • 14" 2.8K 2880x1800 OLED 100%DCI-P3 400 nits 120Hz Display
  • 64GB DDR5-5600MHz SODIMM (2 x 32GB) Memory
  • 1TB SSD M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 Performance TLC Opal
  • Integrated AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
  • Backlit Keyboard
  • Wi-Fi 6E NFA725A 2x2 AX + Bluetooth 5.3
  • Windows 11 Pro
  • Ports:
    • 2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 w/ Power Delivery 3.0 & DisplayPort 1.4
    • 2x USB-A Gbps
    • 1x HDMI 2.1
    • 1x Audio Combo Jack

Editor's Notes

Written by oceanlake

Original Post

Written by Suryasis

Community Voting

Deal Score
+37
Good Deal
Visit Lenovo

Price Intelligence

Model: ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 AMD (14″) Mobile Workstation

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

Hat-Trick
10340 Posts
1515 Reputation
It's $934 now with the BUYMORELENOVO code. If a beautiful 120Hz OLED display and an extra 32GB isn't important to you, then you can save an extra $145 but to me, OLED and 32GB is worth way more than $145.
zizo79
3102 Posts
3337 Reputation
This is not a gaming laptop.
Suryasis
20321 Posts
18547 Reputation
64GB ram is overkill for most of the people and based on that, the other deal is attractive. But, there is Hell & Heaven difference between a 60 Hz 1080p 100% sRGB IPS display and this 120 Hz 2.8K OLED display and I would just go for this model just for that. The additional 32GB of Ram is added bonus.

125 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Original Poster
Pro
Expert
This user is an Expert in Computers
Sep 07, 2024 03:11 AM
20,321 Posts
Joined Jul 2015
SuryasisSep 07, 2024 03:11 AM
Original Poster
Pro
Expert
This user is an Expert in Computers
20,321 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Suryasis

Quote from zizo79 :
Going the build route with the 5G chip gets me to $1366
Front page moderators, while editing my original post for FP, removed a lots of details as usual. Just expand my original post and you will see that this model comes is WWAN ready and comes with required antennas. So, you can just add a 4G/5G Card later to this.
1
Sep 07, 2024 05:05 AM
466 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
db999mdSep 07, 2024 05:05 AM
466 Posts
Just a note about the keyboard while the travel is not as much as it was in the past, it still has the same force required to activate the keys as thinkpads did in the past so it's very easy to get used to it in my opinion. I've had basically every generation think pad over the past 5 to 10 years and had no trouble quickly attaining my usual typing speed with the keyboard on this model.
1
Sep 07, 2024 06:49 AM
13 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
kuleox85Sep 07, 2024 06:49 AM
13 Posts
I've got an x13 gen2 with the below specs... looking to eventually upgrade my wfh workstation. Thoughts on if this is worthy of an upgrade?

Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 Pro 5850U Processor (1.90 GHz, up to 4.40 GHz Max Boost, 8 Cores, 16 Threads, 16 MB Cache)

Graphics Integrated AMD Radeon™ Graphics

Memory 32 GB LPDDR4X 4266MHz (Soldered)

Storage 1 TB PCIe SSD

Display 13.3" WQXGA (2560 x 1600) IPS, anti-glare, low power, 400 nits
Sep 07, 2024 01:24 PM
10,340 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Hat-TrickSep 07, 2024 01:24 PM
10,340 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
It's because they need a time machine to make it work.
Wrong. The $934 deal is NOT this deal at a lower price. It was the now expired $850 deal for IPS and 32GB but the price is now $934. It might have been inferred but wasn't stated this OLED/64GB deal was ever $934.
Sep 07, 2024 01:25 PM
10,340 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Hat-TrickSep 07, 2024 01:25 PM
10,340 Posts
Quote from zizo79 :
Going the build route with the 5G chip gets me to $1366
I posted the link somewhere here, but you can buy this $1079 deal and add the card as an accessory (separate) in the same order and install it yourself.
Sep 07, 2024 01:34 PM
10,340 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Hat-TrickSep 07, 2024 01:34 PM
10,340 Posts
Quote from SharpThread593 :
Just giving some context, no need to take it so personally.

Going back to topic, yes It is a bit magicial because the system as a whole can do more than its windows counterpart with the same amount of ram, hence my original comment.

Yes you are right M1 is fast because of the multi-die package design that contains both the actual processor die and the DRAM, but designing and producing all of this on 5nm nodes was revolutionary for the entry level laptop segment at the time, hardly a costsaving measure with the immense upfront costs. You forgot to mention faster memory retrieval, just looking at memory frequency alone isn't enough. And overall, you are only looking at this from a hardware standpoint which only shows a fraction of why rams on Mac's are 'magical'

Mac soc's are fast because of the tight integration between the hardware and the os. Reference Counting (a memory garbage collection technique) is built right into the apple soc, essentially hardware-accelerating every app running on the OS, including the emulated x86-64. ARM uses a 16K swap file, vs Windows which uses a 4K swap. Throw in other architectural changes and Macs are pretty rapid when using swap. It's still consuming the RAM and still swapping, just not as quick to be bogged down by it.

Apple's quality control of software is superb, especially on memory consumption. That's why iPhones have half the ram but can run faster and do more than any flagship Android phone

Macos will aggressively garbage collect ui elements in apps, that windows won't. So apps that aren't in use, will more quickly use less ram. Apple compounds this by making the definition of 'not in use' also include apps that are open, running, but not visible on the screen - minimized or even just behind another window. And finally, apps that are not in use get reduced scheduling on the cpu, so they need to be loaded into ram to run less frequently. All in all, this means that macos feels much much faster while doing equivalent tasks on windows.

Macos is much better when it comes to swap and actually managing what's using ram. It will happily dump stuff into swap if it's not being used whereas windows applications take up more ram anyway and the os isn't as efficient in swap. Apple will be optimized for such processes. You have to understand windows is made to run on varying hardware. It's not about memory limits. Specs aren't everything like you claim.
While I appreciate what you wrote, you did say "Going back to topic". If you look back at the comment I posted that you replied to, it was 100% about price of the RAM. Period. That's all I said about RAM. All this mumbo-jumbo about performance, efficiency, etc., of not only the memory in a Mac but macOS itself isn't on topic. But maybe some people will get some knowledge from this. Regardless, most people will admit Apple RAM prices are highway robbery and my point is that Apple RAM is just regular RAM that is designed to be in the same package as the CPU/GPU. Whenever this comes up, people always bring up "oh, but it's not the same RAM -- it's Unified Memory". It's the same RAM sitting closer to the CPU/GPU.
Last edited by Hat-Trick September 7, 2024 at 07:37 AM.
Sep 07, 2024 01:42 PM
519 Posts
Joined Aug 2014
Vladz0rSep 07, 2024 01:42 PM
519 Posts
Quote from SharpThread593 :
Just giving some context, no need to take it so personally.

Going back to topic, yes It is a bit magicial because the system as a whole can do more than its windows counterpart with the same amount of ram, hence my original comment.

Yes you are right M1 is fast because of the multi-die package design that contains both the actual processor die and the DRAM, but designing and producing all of this on 5nm nodes was revolutionary for the entry level laptop segment at the time, hardly a costsaving measure with the immense upfront costs. You forgot to mention faster memory retrieval, just looking at memory frequency alone isn't enough. And overall, you are only looking at this from a hardware standpoint which only shows a fraction of why rams on Mac's are 'magical'

Mac soc's are fast because of the tight integration between the hardware and the os. Reference Counting (a memory garbage collection technique) is built right into the apple soc, essentially hardware-accelerating every app running on the OS, including the emulated x86-64. ARM uses a 16K swap file, vs Windows which uses a 4K swap. Throw in other architectural changes and Macs are pretty rapid when using swap. It's still consuming the RAM and still swapping, just not as quick to be bogged down by it.

Apple's quality control of software is superb, especially on memory consumption. That's why iPhones have half the ram but can run faster and do more than any flagship Android phone

Macos will aggressively garbage collect ui elements in apps, that windows won't. So apps that aren't in use, will more quickly use less ram. Apple compounds this by making the definition of 'not in use' also include apps that are open, running, but not visible on the screen - minimized or even just behind another window. And finally, apps that are not in use get reduced scheduling on the cpu, so they need to be loaded into ram to run less frequently. All in all, this means that macos feels much much faster while doing equivalent tasks on windows.

Macos is much better when it comes to swap and actually managing what's using ram. It will happily dump stuff into swap if it's not being used whereas windows applications take up more ram anyway and the os isn't as efficient in swap. Apple will be optimized for such processes. You have to understand windows is made to run on varying hardware. It's not about memory limits. Specs aren't everything like you claim.
I agree with all the performance stuff but I still hate Apple and iOS. Even bought apple products as presents for family. I just can't use them myself but I've come close to jumping on a MacBook. I use too much jank windows and android software.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 07, 2024 02:02 PM
10,340 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Hat-TrickSep 07, 2024 02:02 PM
10,340 Posts
Quote from agentsteve :
This actually has slower RAM than the old 7840U model (lpddr5x 6400 vs ddr5 5600). The 7840U had soldered ram but it's not like you'll upgrade from 64gb anyway.

Better display though (90Hz after edid hack on the old vs 120 on the new)
Could you explain or link to the EDID hack on the older version to get the 60Hz up to 90Hz?
Sep 07, 2024 02:41 PM
27 Posts
Joined Apr 2012
tassadarforaiurSep 07, 2024 02:41 PM
27 Posts
I love the upgradeable ram, 96gb allowed, but it's a shame they stuck with sodimm, instead of the newer camm modules that get the speed a little closer to lpddr5.

With AMD dropping support for windows 10 on strix point, this is probably the best / last 14" Lenovo AMD laptop you'll be able to buy without having to decide between windows 11 and Linux. I would grab it in a heartbeat if I didn't already get the p14s g4 7840u 64gb ram oled deal from last year.

The extra ram is really nice for whenever a browser tab springs a memory leak. Gives you more time to notice before it starts overflowing into the c drive.
Sep 07, 2024 03:14 PM
178 Posts
Joined Sep 2023
SharpThread593Sep 07, 2024 03:14 PM
178 Posts
Quote from Hat-Trick :
While I appreciate what you wrote, you did say "Going back to topic". If you look back at the comment I posted that you replied to, it was 100% about price of the RAM. Period. That's all I said about RAM. All this mumbo-jumbo about performance, efficiency, etc., of not only the memory in a Mac but macOS itself isn't on topic. But maybe some people will get some knowledge from this. Regardless, most people will admit Apple RAM prices are highway robbery and my point is that Apple RAM is just regular RAM that is designed to be in the same package as the CPU/GPU. Whenever this comes up, people always bring up "oh, but it's not the same RAM -- it's Unified Memory". It's the same RAM sitting closer to the CPU/GPU.
I was pointing out that comparing the prices of the two based on the amount of ram isn't correct because macos utilizies ram much more efficiently and is able to do more with the same amount as its windows counterpart. It's literally not the 'same ram' lol but ok.
2
Sep 07, 2024 03:18 PM
178 Posts
Joined Sep 2023
SharpThread593Sep 07, 2024 03:18 PM
178 Posts
Quote from Vladz0r :
I agree with all the performance stuff but I still hate Apple and iOS. Even bought apple products as presents for family. I just can't use them myself but I've come close to jumping on a MacBook. I use too much jank windows and android software.
I was the same exact way until I actually tried the new apple soc macbooks and they are revolutionary, completely changed the way I look at macs. After sacrificing mobile gaming, macbook + windows/linux desktop combo has brought the most value to me. Resale value is insanely high too but user satisfaction is always the most important.
1
Sep 07, 2024 03:52 PM
10,340 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Hat-TrickSep 07, 2024 03:52 PM
10,340 Posts
Quote from SharpThread593 :
I was pointing out that comparing the prices of the two based on the amount of ram isn't correct because macos utilizies ram much more efficiently and is able to do more with the same amount as its windows counterpart. It's literally not the 'same ram' lol but ok.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Efficiency has nothing to do with the COST of the PHYSICAL RAM. They use LPDDR4X and LPDDR5X, just like every one else. Whether you need it or not and how much you need isn't up for debate. Assuming you do need 64GB and opt for the 64GB model, the price is much higher in AppleLand than in LenovoLand.
Last edited by Hat-Trick September 7, 2024 at 09:55 AM.
1
1
Sep 07, 2024 05:42 PM
131 Posts
Joined Oct 2013
mint0909Sep 07, 2024 05:42 PM
131 Posts
Is it possible to replace the battery on this with a much better one?
Sep 07, 2024 06:50 PM
62 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
mmeh97Sep 07, 2024 06:50 PM
62 Posts
Just thought I'd share my experience with 2.8k or 4k screens in this form factor, I just dont get it. The text is so small so you either scale the image, or reduce to 1080p or 1920x1200 anyway. It seems like wasted dollars and battery consumption.

I will never purposely buy a laptop with 2.8k or 4k when 1920x1080/1200 is an option. To me 16:10 is much more important - getting more vertical real-estate is a game changer.
4

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 07, 2024 06:52 PM
62 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
mmeh97Sep 07, 2024 06:52 PM
62 Posts
2.8k or even 4k seems so pointless in this size laptop.

Give me 1920x1200 and the extra vertical space for productivity and web browsing - thats the key.

I've owned a 4k screen that was considered a fantastic panel, and hated it. Everything is so small you either scale the image, which many OSes dont do so well, or downgrade the resolution.
Last edited by mmeh97 September 7, 2024 at 12:53 PM.
3

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals