This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
One of those reviews of of "L' glass lenses is with the Canon 400 f2.8 weighing over 6lbs and a list price of $11,999. Pro Tip of the Day: If you can afford glass like that you'd probably be springing for a $600 monopod, not $60.
Just know anyone using better lenses that have some weight (cost) to them, this monopod seems to not be sturdy based on multiple reviews. Was almost in for one, but after reading several reviews of people with L glass lenses, this thing seemed to have questionable long-term quality.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Just know anyone using better lenses that have some weight (cost) to them, this monopod seems to not be sturdy based on multiple reviews. Was almost in for one, but after reading several reviews of people with L glass lenses, this thing seemed to have questionable long-term quality.
Just know anyone using better lenses that have some weight (cost) to them, this monopod seems to not be sturdy based on multiple reviews. Was almost in for one, but after reading several reviews of people with L glass lenses, this thing seemed to have questionable long-term quality.
Almost pulled the trigger b/c of the Manfrotto name. However, the flimsiness mentioned in the reviews is giving me pause. Anyone with first hand experience?
Almost pulled the trigger b/c of the Manfrotto name. However, the flimsiness mentioned in the reviews is giving me pause. Anyone with first hand experience?
The "Manfrotto name" isn't as good as their prices suggest. Way overpriced for what you get! Benro or Siriui are a better bang for buck
Almost pulled the trigger b/c of the Manfrotto name. However, the flimsiness mentioned in the reviews is giving me pause. Anyone with first hand experience?
This thing has a tiny bottom leg. It's made of the same material as the Titan sub. If you're planning on putting heavy glass on this leg, be prepared for some tragic results from your photos.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Quote
from ayaniga
:
Just know anyone using better lenses that have some weight (cost) to them, this monopod seems to not be sturdy based on multiple reviews. Was almost in for one, but after reading several reviews of people with L glass lenses, this thing seemed to have questionable long-term quality.
One of those reviews of of "L' glass lenses is with the Canon 400 f2.8 weighing over 6lbs and a list price of $11,999. Pro Tip of the Day: If you can afford glass like that you'd probably be springing for a $600 monopod, not $60.
One of those reviews of of "L' glass lenses is with the Canon 400 f2.8 weighing over 6lbs and a list price of $11,999. Pro Tip of the Day: If you can afford glass like that you'd probably be springing for a $600 monopod, not $60.
Oh yeah, I completely agree and threw out that stupid review! No one in their right mind cheaps out on that expensive of equipment.
I know for my r6, even the 24-70 2.8 lens is pretty heavy. If using my mirrorless converter and 1.6x extender on my 70-200 2.8 gets fairly heavy.
There were other reviews of people saying the rubber foot tore off as well, which is concerning.
I need a monopod by just haven't pulled the trigger. So I clicked this link, read some reviews, and then bought the Amazon Basics for $22. Because I actually needed a monopod but kept forgetting.
Top Comments
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
19 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you have the Payboo card, you save on the sales tax as well.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Here is the expensive, super packable version
https://www.metoliuscli
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
I know for my r6, even the 24-70 2.8 lens is pretty heavy. If using my mirrorless converter and 1.6x extender on my 70-200 2.8 gets fairly heavy.
There were other reviews of people saying the rubber foot tore off as well, which is concerning.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!