Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum thread Posted by qpjj • Nov 29, 2024
forum thread Posted by qpjj • Nov 29, 2024

Canon Refurbished RF50mm F1.2 L USM $1299

$1,299

Canon
7 Comments 2,338 Views
Get Deal at Canon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Refurbished RF50mm F1.2 L USM at Canon for $1299. Might be the best price so far.

Refurbished RF85mm F1.2 L USM $1499

https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/p/...f1-2-l-usm
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Refurbished RF50mm F1.2 L USM at Canon for $1299. Might be the best price so far.

Refurbished RF85mm F1.2 L USM $1499

https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/p/...f1-2-l-usm

Community Voting

Deal Score
+1
Good Deal
Get Deal at Canon

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

7 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 29, 2024
517 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
Nov 29, 2024
YawY
Nov 29, 2024
517 Posts
Out of stock
Nov 29, 2024
2,759 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
Nov 29, 2024
LavenderPickle7682
Nov 29, 2024
2,759 Posts
Quote from YawY :
Out of stock
Yep, must've been "we have three in stock" sort of deals.
Nov 30, 2024
515 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
Nov 30, 2024
mycardson
Nov 30, 2024
515 Posts
What a thefty RF tax.
Refurbed EF 50 1.2 is $600 and in stock for at least half an hour last Thursday midnight.
2
Dec 1, 2024
2,759 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
Dec 1, 2024
LavenderPickle7682
Dec 1, 2024
2,759 Posts
Quote from mycardson :
What a thefty RF tax.
Refurbed EF 50 1.2 is $600 and in stock for at least half an hour last Thursday midnight.
The RF 50mm 1.2 is a totally different beast of a lens than its older EF cousin. Same goes for the 85mm. There are also multiple EF revisions of lenses -- take the EF 16-35mm L lens. There are THREE different models, each indicated by a I, II, or III.

The I is awful -- so bad you'd think it's broken, but nope -- that's just how it is. The II is kinda OKish, especially if you stop it down and avoid paying too much attention to the edge sharpness. The III is actually pretty decent.

The III does NOT have IS, and it's $900. Whereas you can get the slightly slower, lighter, smaller, and cheaper 16-35 f/4 L lens for $500...and it also comes with IS. And the optical performance is on-par with the 16-35 III version (sans the brighter aperture).

What I'm saying is...the RF 50mm isn't a tax, but a genuine improvement. Same for many of the lenses on the RF platform.
Dec 1, 2024
140 Posts
Joined Sep 2020
Dec 1, 2024
hijazist
Dec 1, 2024
140 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
The RF 50mm 1.2 is a totally different beast of a lens than its older EF cousin. Same goes for the 85mm. There are also multiple EF revisions of lenses -- take the EF 16-35mm L lens. There are THREE different models, each indicated by a I, II, or III.

The I is awful -- so bad you'd think it's broken, but nope -- that's just how it is. The II is kinda OKish, especially if you stop it down and avoid paying too much attention to the edge sharpness. The III is actually pretty decent.

The III does NOT have IS, and it's $900. Whereas you can get the slightly slower, lighter, smaller, and cheaper 16-35 f/4 L lens for $500...and it also comes with IS. And the optical performance is on-par with the 16-35 III version (sans the brighter aperture).

What I'm saying is...the RF 50mm isn't a tax, but a genuine improvement. Same for many of the lenses on the RF platform.
100%. The 50 1.2 RF is one of the best, if not the best, lenses I've ever used. The EF version was a pain to use with slow AF and very soft wide open, not to mention the EF is an almost 20 year old design.

Some people just don't know what they're talking about.
Dec 2, 2024
515 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
Dec 2, 2024
mycardson
Dec 2, 2024
515 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
The RF 50mm 1.2 is a totally different beast of a lens than its older EF cousin. Same goes for the 85mm. There are also multiple EF revisions of lenses -- take the EF 16-35mm L lens. There are THREE different models, each indicated by a I, II, or III.The I is awful -- so bad you'd think it's broken, but nope -- that's just how it is. The II is kinda OKish, especially if you stop it down and avoid paying too much attention to the edge sharpness. The III is actually pretty decent.The III does NOT have IS, and it's $900. Whereas you can get the slightly slower, lighter, smaller, and cheaper 16-35 f/4 L lens for $500...and it also comes with IS. And the optical performance is on-par with the 16-35 III version (sans the brighter aperture).What I'm saying is...the RF 50mm isn't a tax, but a genuine improvement. Same for many of the lenses on the RF platform.
https://www.dxomark.com/canon-rf-...sm-review/
https://www.slrlounge.com/the-can...0mm-f1-2l/
I totally agree that RF 50 F1.2 is better than EF 50 F1.2. However for double the price (either new or refurb), RF version didn't deliver that much of an improvement.
Per DXO's review, RF 50 F1.2 can't event beat Sigma 50 F1.4. It didn't win over competitor (Sony, Nikon) either.
I'm a Canon user, but overall the pricing on RF product line and its RF mount ban on full frame third party lens companies are quite disappointing, especially comparing to Sony and Nikon.
Dec 5, 2024
1,178 Posts
Joined Mar 2017
Dec 5, 2024
11A
Dec 5, 2024
1,178 Posts
Quote from mycardson :
What a thefty RF tax.
Refurbed EF 50 1.2 is $600 and in stock for at least half an hour last Thursday midnight.
These new 50mm f1.2 lens prices are just nuts both by Canon and by Sony.
Sigma gives you much better value if you're on Sony. Still nuts though compared to what 50mm lenses used to cost. Yes, modern 50mm lenses are sharper than the old, 1970s designs. But still. At least the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG DN Art Lens for Sony E is "only" $739 on sale. That's a brilliant lens. Can't wait for the Chinese (e.g. Viltrox) to come to the rescue in the next year or two!

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All