Various Retailers have 65" TCL QM8 Serries 4K UHD HDR QD-Mini LED Google Smart TV (2024 Model, 65QM851G) on sale from $898. Shipping is free or select free store pickup where available.
Thanks to Deal Hunter ItsSoCheap for finding this deal.
Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Various Retailers have 65" TCL QM8 Serries 4K UHD HDR QD-Mini LED Google Smart TV (2024 Model, 65QM851G) on sale from $898. Shipping is free or select free store pickup where available.
Thanks to Deal Hunter ItsSoCheap for finding this deal.
Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Model: TCL 65-Inch QM85 QLED 4K Smart QD-Mini LED TV with Google TV (65QM851G, 2024 Model) Dolby Vision IQ HDR, Dolby Atmos, Game Accelerator up to 240Hz, Voice Remote, Works with Alexa, Streaming Television
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Take your OLED price and divide by 5x. That's how much you're paying annually for your OLED TV. After 5 years, it's probably toast if you watch with any frequency ...
As for QM7 vs. QM8. Are you really watching in a room that's got full sunlight, and you're watching all the time in mid-day? And you know that the average TV needs that 1000+ nits brightness like, once per 2 hours for about 3-5 seconds, for that one explosion in Mad Max : Fury Road . Is it really worth the extra $200 for that? I mean, seriously? Also, when ALL of the high-power Mini-Leds (from Hisense AND TCL) are wearing out EARLY on the rtings.com long-term tests, are you sure you want a Mini-Led that lasts just as short as an OLED ?? I did a calculation and you're paying $56 per hour of super-bright 1000-nits operation if what I'm saying about the frequency in movies is correct - over the lifetime of the TV.
Hisense and TCL are trying to destroy the OLED market. LG (and now Samsung - with QD-OLED) are the only companies that can make OLED panels. The chinese cannot make them. So the chinese are trying to destroy ALL of the korean TV makers. They will stop at nothing - including state subsidies, giving TVs away at below-the-cost-to-manufacture-them, to force LG & Samsung out of business. They are offering super-bright TVs with thousands of dimming zones because those are the things that OLED cannot do .. yet. They hope to drive Samsung and LG out of business before these irresponsibly over-bright almost-on-fire Chinese TVs start to fail, which apparently, they are doing rather quickly, according to rtings.com .
So you mean the world ending at OLED no more new technology. There were many big brands from USA, Japan, Europe that talked the same things about plasma, blah, blah and they disappeared without a trace. The same fate for Korean made OLED if it cannot be affordable for the majority of consumers.
So what's the deal with some people saying OLEDs have burn ins and shorter lifespan? Is that still true? Think that may be why people may pick a mini LED over OLED
I ordered the 65inch QM7, do you all think the $200 sale price difference is enough to retrun and spend extra to get QM8, is the $200 worth it in features and difference in TV. My QM7 is being delivered on Monday the 9th.
If you want a lil better picture with lil better motion handling its is...I know I would spend the $200
If you want a lil better picture with lil better motion handling its is...I know I would spend the $200
Thank you for the words, I did go with the QM7 and have been playing with the settings and I am not disapointed this is an amazing tv for the price. My Oled on sharper image and deep contast can't be beat, but the QM7 has the brightness and great motion. very happy
Take your OLED price and divide by 5x. That's how much you're paying annually for your OLED TV. After 5 years, it's probably toast if you watch with any frequency ...
As for QM7 vs. QM8. Are you really watching in a room that's got full sunlight, and you're watching all the time in mid-day? And you know that the average TV needs that 1000+ nits brightness like, once per 2 hours for about 3-5 seconds, for that one explosion in Mad Max : Fury Road . Is it really worth the extra $200 for that? I mean, seriously? Also, when ALL of the high-power Mini-Leds (from Hisense AND TCL) are wearing out EARLY on the rtings.com long-term tests, are you sure you want a Mini-Led that lasts just as short as an OLED ?? I did a calculation and you're paying $56 per hour of super-bright 1000-nits operation if what I'm saying about the frequency in movies is correct - over the lifetime of the TV.
Hisense and TCL are trying to destroy the OLED market. LG (and now Samsung - with QD-OLED) are the only companies that can make OLED panels. The chinese cannot make them. So the chinese are trying to destroy ALL of the korean TV makers. They will stop at nothing - including state subsidies, giving TVs away at below-the-cost-to-manufacture-them, to force LG & Samsung out of business. They are offering super-bright TVs with thousands of dimming zones because those are the things that OLED cannot do .. yet. They hope to drive Samsung and LG out of business before these irresponsibly over-bright almost-on-fire Chinese TVs start to fail, which apparently, they are doing rather quickly, according to rtings.com .
Absolutely not true. I have an LG B7A from 2017 that's been used for hours every single day and a significant portion of time used playing destiny then destiny 2, Diablo and many more games. Picture is still great. I don't know where you got that 5 year thing from but definitely not true in my case.
Top Comments
37 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As for QM7 vs. QM8. Are you really watching in a room that's got full sunlight, and you're watching all the time in mid-day? And you know that the average TV needs that 1000+ nits brightness like, once per 2 hours for about 3-5 seconds, for that one explosion in Mad Max : Fury Road . Is it really worth the extra $200 for that? I mean, seriously? Also, when ALL of the high-power Mini-Leds (from Hisense AND TCL) are wearing out EARLY on the rtings.com long-term tests, are you sure you want a Mini-Led that lasts just as short as an OLED ?? I did a calculation and you're paying $56 per hour of super-bright 1000-nits operation if what I'm saying about the frequency in movies is correct - over the lifetime of the TV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7...LTM
Hisense and TCL are trying to destroy the OLED market. LG (and now Samsung - with QD-OLED) are the only companies that can make OLED panels. The chinese cannot make them. So the chinese are trying to destroy ALL of the korean TV makers. They will stop at nothing - including state subsidies, giving TVs away at below-the-cost-to-manufacture-them, to force LG & Samsung out of business. They are offering super-bright TVs with thousands of dimming zones because those are the things that OLED cannot do .. yet. They hope to drive Samsung and LG out of business before these irresponsibly over-bright almost-on-fire Chinese TVs start to fail, which apparently, they are doing rather quickly, according to rtings.com .
As for QM7 vs. QM8. Are you really watching in a room that's got full sunlight, and you're watching all the time in mid-day? And you know that the average TV needs that 1000+ nits brightness like, once per 2 hours for about 3-5 seconds, for that one explosion in Mad Max : Fury Road . Is it really worth the extra $200 for that? I mean, seriously? Also, when ALL of the high-power Mini-Leds (from Hisense AND TCL) are wearing out EARLY on the rtings.com long-term tests, are you sure you want a Mini-Led that lasts just as short as an OLED ?? I did a calculation and you're paying $56 per hour of super-bright 1000-nits operation if what I'm saying about the frequency in movies is correct - over the lifetime of the TV.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7...LTM
Hisense and TCL are trying to destroy the OLED market. LG (and now Samsung - with QD-OLED) are the only companies that can make OLED panels. The chinese cannot make them. So the chinese are trying to destroy ALL of the korean TV makers. They will stop at nothing - including state subsidies, giving TVs away at below-the-cost-to-manufacture-them, to force LG & Samsung out of business. They are offering super-bright TVs with thousands of dimming zones because those are the things that OLED cannot do .. yet. They hope to drive Samsung and LG out of business before these irresponsibly over-bright almost-on-fire Chinese TVs start to fail, which apparently, they are doing rather quickly, according to rtings.com .