Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by iconian | Staff • Jan 8, 2025
frontpage Posted by iconian | Staff • Jan 8, 2025

Mirabox USB Capture Card with 1080p 60fps HDMI Passthrough + 3.5mm Audio

& More + Free Shipping

$20

$40

50% off
Amazon
64 Comments 42,167 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Mirabox Official Store via Amazon has Mirabox USB Capture Card with 1080p 60fps HDMI Passthrough, up to 4K Support and Audio & Mic Ports (Grey, HSV3202) on sale for $39.99 - 50% with promo code 50DQQAWO during checkout = $19.99. Shipping is free.

Mirabox Official Store via Amazon has Mirabox USB Capture Card with 1080p 60fps HDMI Passthrough, up to 4K Support (Black, HSV320) on sale for $39.99 - 50% with promo code 50DQQAWO during checkout = $19.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.About this Item:
  • 1080p, 720p HDMI device such as Wii U, PS4, PS3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, Wii, Switch etc
  • Support for up to 4K passthrough
  • Plug-and-play for Windows Unix, Mac OS, windows 7/8/10
  • Loopout resolution up to 1080/60Hz, capture resolution up to 1080/60Hz

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Mirabox Official Store via Amazon has Mirabox USB Capture Card with 1080p 60fps HDMI Passthrough, up to 4K Support and Audio & Mic Ports (Grey, HSV3202) on sale for $39.99 - 50% with promo code 50DQQAWO during checkout = $19.99. Shipping is free.

Mirabox Official Store via Amazon has Mirabox USB Capture Card with 1080p 60fps HDMI Passthrough, up to 4K Support (Black, HSV320) on sale for $39.99 - 50% with promo code 50DQQAWO during checkout = $19.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.About this Item:
  • 1080p, 720p HDMI device such as Wii U, PS4, PS3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, Wii, Switch etc
  • Support for up to 4K passthrough
  • Plug-and-play for Windows Unix, Mac OS, windows 7/8/10
  • Loopout resolution up to 1080/60Hz, capture resolution up to 1080/60Hz

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+30
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Mirabox USB3.0 HDMI Video Capture Card for Nintendo Switch, 1080P 60FPS HD Game Capture Device Cam Link With HDMI Passthrough Work with DSLR Xbox PS4 for OBS Twitch Game Live Streaming and Recording

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
05/14/25Amazon$20
2
02/08/25Amazon$20 popular
21

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/18/2025, 02:17 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$39.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

kadenza
61 Posts
41 Reputation
Reviewers are pointing out that this is NOT an USB3.0 device but USB2.0
ThriftyName3005
125 Posts
14 Reputation
Yes unless your analogue to HDMI solution outputs some odd resolution/framerate that the capture card isn't compatible with. You will need some form of capture software to record the signal, such as OBS (free). Set the capture card as a source in OBS, full screen it in a capture scene, and then manually start and stop the recording for the entirety of the tape. You don't need to perfectly start and end your recording if you just clip the start and ending later in some video editing software.
SMarioMan
14 Posts
10 Reputation
It's absolutely due to the interface. YouTube videos come encoded in a compressed format. These USB 2.0 devices likewise compress the video stream before sending it to your PC.
The full bandwidth required for uncompressed 1080p60 for HDMI is about 3Gbps, which can be provided over USB 3.0. When the feed comes in uncompressed, you can encode it yourself on the PC end, and any modern PC will be able to do so far more efficiently and flexibly than whatever a cheap USB capture card could manage.

I get what you're saying. There is a potential for USB 2.0 capture devices to have beefy enough encoders to achieve transparency (perceptually indistinguishable from uncompressed) quality, but I'd still prefer uncompressed feeds when possible.

63 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 10, 2025
383 Posts
Joined Apr 2013
Jan 10, 2025
almightyarts
Jan 10, 2025
383 Posts
With passthrough will I still be able to play a console at 120fps but record at 60?
1
Jan 10, 2025
213 Posts
Joined Nov 2017
Jan 10, 2025
consig1iere
Jan 10, 2025
213 Posts
Quote from Matthew08 :
Yes you are, high quality USB 3 devices like the elgato can push higher quality video instead of crappy MJPEG or whatever this uses
This is a capture card. USB 2 vs. 3 is a matter of a few seconds if you are recording. Are you talking about live streaming?
3
Expert
This user is an Expert in Home & Home Improvement
Jan 10, 2025
4,772 Posts
Joined Oct 2013
Jan 10, 2025
wherestheanykey
Expert
This user is an Expert in Home & Home Improvement
Jan 10, 2025
4,772 Posts
Quote from SMarioMan :
It's absolutely due to the interface. YouTube videos come encoded in a compressed format. These USB 2.0 devices likewise compress the video stream before sending it to your PC.
The full bandwidth required for uncompressed 1080p60 for HDMI is about 3Gbps, which can be provided over USB 3.0. When the feed comes in uncompressed, you can encode it yourself on the PC end, and any modern PC will be able to do so far more efficiently and flexibly than whatever a cheap USB capture card could manage.

I get what you're saying. There is a potential for USB 2.0 capture devices to have beefy enough encoders to achieve transparency (perceptually indistinguishable from uncompressed) quality, but I'd still prefer uncompressed feeds when possible.
Moving the goalposts much?

You're talking about uncompressed video, which is not something you're going to find on many capture devices, let alone one for $20. And frankly, there's little reason not to do on-device encoding if the source and output are homogeneous anyway, as most streaming platforms are.

The reality is that the device is already doing encoding by way of 4K to 1080P, so whether it's interfacing via USB 2, 3, or even 4 is irrelevant.

Regardless of what you "prefer", this particular device doesn't require the bandwidth.
4
Expert
This user is an Expert in Home & Home Improvement
Jan 10, 2025
4,772 Posts
Joined Oct 2013
Jan 10, 2025
wherestheanykey
Expert
This user is an Expert in Home & Home Improvement
Jan 10, 2025
4,772 Posts
Quote from DigitalSteve :
I refuse to deal with companies that purposely deceive in their logos. Trying to make you think it has 4K capture, crooks all the way. So many on Amazon.
Where is the purposeful deception?

It accepts 4K input and the description says it outputs 1080P.

The $40 original price should have been a dead giveaway, since higher end devices that output 4K can get up into the 100s.

If you do all your shopping based on pictures and logos alone, that's kind of on you (Panda Express doesn't actually serve panda, by the way).
1
3
Jan 10, 2025
17 Posts
Joined Jul 2018
Jan 10, 2025
PaulMcCCccCC
Jan 10, 2025
17 Posts
Quote from sockhatabe :
plus it being misleading as most rookies are gonna see 4k passthrough on the device it's self and then be like... "where is my 4k bruh?" when it only captures in 1080p
this^^^^
Jan 10, 2025
16,665 Posts
Joined Jan 2004
Jan 10, 2025
chong67
Jan 10, 2025
16,665 Posts
Can use this to capture Netflix, Hulu, etc?
Jan 10, 2025
6,821 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
Jan 10, 2025
geniv
Jan 10, 2025
6,821 Posts
Quote from chong67 :
Can use this to capture Netflix, Hulu, etc?
Yes hook a firestick to it

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 10, 2025
6,821 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
Jan 10, 2025
geniv
Jan 10, 2025
6,821 Posts
In for one. Will give it a shot. Can return if needed
Too bad the grey usb3.0 is gone. Usb2.0 should still be fine forn 1080p 60fps encoded stream.

Question is if the passthrough is really lag free.
The elgatos say passthrough but when recording there is a noticable lag. I have to use a dedicated HDMI splitter to avoid the lag


Will stream my record my games for youtube
TheOldFartGamer on channel Basement RetroTech Junk
Jan 10, 2025
393 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Jan 10, 2025
aerogems
Jan 10, 2025
393 Posts
Quote from geniv :
Yes hook a firestick to it
HDCP is intended to prevent exactly this sort of thing, but I suppose it's fairly cheap so even if it doesn't work you just send it back, or worst case, you're not out a lot of money and maybe can find another use for it later rather than adding to the pile of e-waste in various landfills.
Jan 10, 2025
393 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Jan 10, 2025
aerogems
Jan 10, 2025
393 Posts
Quote :
Plug-and-play for Windows Unix, Mac OS, windows 7/8/10
Did Microsoft revive Xenix when I wasn't paying attention?
Jan 10, 2025
358 Posts
Joined Apr 2008
Jan 10, 2025
EnTerr
Jan 10, 2025
358 Posts
How is this "Mirabox" different than say "Wiistar" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CKLCJB33 that sells for ~$20 every day?
(is it having the red caps on the box?)
Jan 11, 2025
246 Posts
Joined Sep 2023
Jan 11, 2025
FancyMint8485
Jan 11, 2025
246 Posts
Do these cheapie boxes always only capture in MJPEG? I've tried two different ones, and every capture program I've tried only gives me MJPEG as a codec option.
Jan 11, 2025
145 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
Jan 11, 2025
oingo456
Jan 11, 2025
145 Posts
Quote from wherestheanykey :
Moving the goalposts much?You're talking about uncompressed video, which is not something you're going to find on many capture devices, let alone one for $20. And frankly, there's little reason not to do on-device encoding if the source and output are homogeneous anyway, as most streaming platforms are.The reality is that the device is already doing encoding by way of 4K to 1080P, so whether it's interfacing via USB 2, 3, or even 4 is irrelevant.Regardless of what you "prefer", this particular device doesn't require the bandwidth.
The 12mbps youtube example you gave is laughable. The point SMarioMan is making is that these ARE capturing uncompressed video. So you comparing a 12mbps youtube video (compressed) cannot be compared to the usb 2.0 480mbps capture rate and say that is enough. The uncompressed 12mbps could be 3Gbps HDMI raw video frames. How good is the cheap encoder? can it recompress it back to usb 2.0 speeds (maybe 200mbps) and be acceptable ? Mjpeg kind of sucks.
Jan 11, 2025
358 Posts
Joined Apr 2008
Jan 11, 2025
EnTerr
Jan 11, 2025
358 Posts
Quote from oingo456 :
The 12mbps youtube example you gave is laughable. The point SMarioMan is making is that these ARE capturing uncompressed video. So you comparing a 12mbps youtube video (compressed) cannot be compared to the usb 2.0 480mbps capture rate and say that is enough. The uncompressed 12mbps could be 3Gbps HDMI raw video frames. How good is the cheap encoder? can it recompress it back to usb 2.0 speeds (maybe 200mbps) and be acceptable ? Mjpeg kind of sucks.
MJPEG "kinda sucks" only in the sense that it is low-compression codec - i read it results in 10-20mbps stream. That can flow fine through USB 2.0, can't it? And then when it arrives on the host, you can re-compress it however you please.

Contrast and compare that to say Netflix that i am seeing push on my Roku now 1080p content at 2mbps in HEVC (h.265) format.
So yes, if there were a card that compresses "on the fly" video really well, it will use even less bandwidth to transfer to the host, meaning that USB 3.0 is even less needed! Not something that makers of expensive cards will tell you, since if they say "you don't need USB 3.0" then why would you buy from them? It falls in the area of white lies - they put USB 3.0 and advertise that - yet there is zero benefit from that (which they don't mention - or vaguely wave hands "moar is always is better")

But hey, there is something else to think about - to be able to do more compression, device should be able to better analyze large windows of the stream and use "P" and "B" frames (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vid...ture_types ) in abundance, which makes for high latency stream. Meaning there is longer delay of the streamed video from real-time. Whereas MJPEG uses only "I" frames, so does not need to wait => low latency.

As a metaphor, think MJPEG as "simultaneous interpretation" when translating from another language - they could do it on the fly, while the other person is speaking. It's not perfect but happens in real time. In contrast, the "offline translation" is able to convey much better of a book or a poem but cannot possibly be done on the fly. Similarly, the streaming services industry (Netflix, Prime, Hulu, Paramount, Disney etc) do not use capture cards to get their final files, that is done in post-processing, offline

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 11, 2025
397 Posts
Joined Mar 2009
Jan 11, 2025
newportoldport
Jan 11, 2025
397 Posts
quick question, is there any reason why i wouldn't get the one with the audio and mic ports? seems like more features for the same price.

buying both just in case. repped!

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All