Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredEragorn | Staff posted Feb 2, 2025 9:05 PM

2TB MSI SPATIUM M461 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe QLC Solid State Drive

$85

$100

15% off
+ Free Shippingat MSI
67.2K Views
Visit MSI
Deal Details
MSI has 2TB MSI SPATIUM M461 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe QLC Solid State Drive (SM461N2TB) on sale for $84.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Eragorn for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 2TB Capacity
  • Phison E21T Controller
  • Micron QLC NAND Flash
  • M.2 2280 (Single-Sided) Form Factor
  • Sequential Read speeds up to 5000MB/s
  • Sequential Write speeds up to 4200MB/s
  • Up to 450 TBW
  • 5-Year Warranty

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • Offer valid for a limited time only / while supplies last.

Original Post

Written by Eragorn | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
MSI has 2TB MSI SPATIUM M461 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe QLC Solid State Drive (SM461N2TB) on sale for $84.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Eragorn for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 2TB Capacity
  • Phison E21T Controller
  • Micron QLC NAND Flash
  • M.2 2280 (Single-Sided) Form Factor
  • Sequential Read speeds up to 5000MB/s
  • Sequential Write speeds up to 4200MB/s
  • Up to 450 TBW
  • 5-Year Warranty

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • Offer valid for a limited time only / while supplies last.

Original Post

Written by Eragorn | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+77
Good Deal
Visit MSI

Top Comments

Join The Conversation

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

72 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 3, 2025 5:16 AM
553 Comments
Joined Oct 2021
CrimsonRose733Feb 3, 2025 5:16 AM
553 Comments
Quote from mfour :
Similar things were discussed before, and some people apparently don't care, but still...
TBW: 450 TB?!

Compared to various other 2TB models:

WD Blue SN580,
WD SN5000: 900 TB

Crucial P5+,
Samsung 870 EVO,
Samsung 990 EVO+,
WD SN770: 1200 TB
Think how often you actually completely overwrite the entire drive. I know half of my drive has been static since I installed windows. I've never seen an SSD below 90% life.
4
Feb 3, 2025 5:54 AM
6.6K Comments
Joined Feb 2008
RyanLFeb 3, 2025 5:54 AM
6.6K Comments
Quote from CrimsonRose733 :
Think how often you actually completely overwrite the entire drive. I know half of my drive has been static since I installed windows. I've never seen an SSD below 90% life.
LOL, nobody does that and that's not how they typically fail. A more realistic scenario is when the drive is kept at near capacity and windows continuously writes to the same sectors over and over. Then wear issues start to present themselves. I don't like the wear #s they throw out there for SSDs and are about as useless as synthetic benchmarks.
1
Feb 3, 2025 5:58 AM
71 Comments
Joined Jan 2025
EfficientGalley297Feb 3, 2025 5:58 AM
71 Comments
Quote from mfour :
Similar things were discussed before, and some people apparently don't care, but still... TBW: 450 TB?! Compared to various other 2TB models: WD Blue SN580, WD SN5000: 900 TB Crucial P5+, Samsung 870 EVO, Samsung 990 EVO+, WD SN770: 1200 TB
240TB since 2018 with my 960 EVO. Backblaze was a huge part of that, since I was backing up terabytes worth of media. I'd probably be under 100TB if it weren't for Backblaze. And again, since 2018. I've thrown a little bit of everything at it.
Just for kicks, I also have a 840 Pro from 2013 working as a boot drive in a torrent box. Has 138TB of writes on it.
Instead of buying based endurance ratings, I'd look more into real customer reviews. Some drives really are flops. Everything else will probably outlast you.
Feb 3, 2025 6:56 AM
1.3K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
TsumiFeb 3, 2025 6:56 AM
1.3K Comments
Quote from mfour :
Both are storage devices. I value my data, and this one isn't cheap enough to be worth it.
FWIW, Samsung 870 QVO 2TB is 720 TB.

If the manufacturer doesn't trust its product much, neither would I.


Though it might just be a warranty limitation of sorts, I don't know if that's really the case.
It could just as well be correlated with data retention. The more you write, the more likely you are to get data corrupted somewhere.
Are you following the 3-2-1 backup principle? If not, you're not valuing your data as much as you think you are. QLC vs TLC is the least if your concerns if data retention is a priority.

I will agree that a 2tb QLC drive should be $80 or less, but in the current market it's a decently good price. The price of storage has gone up in general in the last few months.

Quote from HilariousCaribou423 :
Same question, however I know a heatsink would be required.. but the downvotes suggest it won't?
It'll work, it just won't be very fast at downloading/writing due to lack of HMB and DRAM, on top of being QLC. Read speeds should be generally okay, unnoticeable unless comparing side-by-side.
Feb 3, 2025 11:28 AM
232 Comments
Joined Jun 2014
mfourFeb 3, 2025 11:28 AM
232 Comments
Quote from CrimsonRose733 :
I've never seen an SSD below 90% life.
AFAIK that's not something reported by the drive, but rather an arbitrary calculation by each specific SMART app. So I don't consider it a very informative piece of info.

Quote from RyanL :
A more realistic scenario is when the drive is kept at near capacity and windows continuously writes to the same sectors over and over. Then wear issues start to present themselves.
SSDs do wear leveling. So regardless of which logical sector you write, the actual writes are spread over the whole drive.

Quote from EfficientGalley297 :
Instead of buying based endurance ratings, I'd look more into real customer reviews.
I consider multiple factors, including specs.

Quote from Tsumi :
QLC vs TLC is the least if your concerns if data retention is a priority.
I was focusing on TBW rather than QLC/TLC. But also not all QLCs are the same, like the mentioned Samsung one with 60% more TBW at the same 2TB size.
Feb 3, 2025 1:02 PM
284 Comments
Joined Apr 2013
snydertalonFeb 3, 2025 1:02 PM
284 Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank snydertalon

Quote from dmbase :
TBW is such a silly thing to get hung up on when choosing an SSD. At 450 TBW, you could write 150 GB per week for over 57 years before it would reach that warranty. How many people can say that they seriously write 150 GB per week on a regular basis? You are far more likely to have a controller fail than you will have a write failure.
I get your point, and I agree with you. But a serious answer to your question: astrophotographers. After 4 nights of shooting the Orion Nebula, the processed files (files required for processing are in addition to files captured) are 486GB. But the program kept failing. I ran it a half a dozen times. During the height of winter (height of nebula season) I easily write over a 1 TB per week. These numbers are also only for the files stored. I have no insight into how much is written as cache during processing.

And even then this thing would last me for 9 years.
3
Feb 3, 2025 2:51 PM
115 Comments
Joined May 2013
Puma81Feb 3, 2025 2:51 PM
115 Comments
Is this sufficient for a gaming computer?

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 3, 2025 2:58 PM
16.9K Comments
Joined Jan 2004
chong67Feb 3, 2025 2:58 PM
16.9K Comments
I will be using it for non OS stuff. Is this OK? I like the 5 yr warranty.
Feb 3, 2025 3:55 PM
1.3K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
TsumiFeb 3, 2025 3:55 PM
1.3K Comments
Quote from mfour :
AFAIK that's not something reported by the drive, but rather an arbitrary calculation by each specific SMART app. So I don't consider it a very informative piece of info.


SSDs do wear leveling. So regardless of which logical sector you write, the actual writes are spread over the whole drive.


I consider multiple factors, including specs.


I was focusing on TBW rather than QLC/TLC. But also not all QLCs are the same, like the mentioned Samsung one with 60% more TBW at the same 2TB size.
TBW is also low on the list of concerns if data retention is truly a priority.
Feb 3, 2025 4:41 PM
7.1K Comments
Joined Dec 2006
megablankFeb 3, 2025 4:41 PM
7.1K Comments
Quote from mfour :
AFAIK that's not something reported by the drive, but rather an arbitrary calculation by each specific SMART app. So I don't consider it a very informative piece of info.


SSDs do wear leveling. So regardless of which logical sector you write, the actual writes are spread over the whole drive.


I consider multiple factors, including specs.


I was focusing on TBW rather than QLC/TLC. But also not all QLCs are the same, like the mentioned Samsung one with 60% more TBW at the same 2TB size.
Yea the wear leveling is much worse when full so you get write amplification.
Feb 3, 2025 4:58 PM
611 Comments
Joined Feb 2021
FormerAstronutFeb 3, 2025 4:58 PM
611 Comments
Quote from snydertalon :
I get your point, and I agree with you. But a serious answer to your question: astrophotographers. After 4 nights of shooting the Orion Nebula, the processed files (files required for processing are in addition to files captured) are 486GB. But the program kept failing. I ran it a half a dozen times. During the height of winter (height of nebula season) I easily write over a 1 TB per week. These numbers are also only for the files stored. I have no insight into how much is written as cache during processing.

And even then this thing would last me for 9 years.
And this is the thing right here, 1TB/week is an extreme use case, like upper 1% of users do this. And if a user is actually in this "professional" (even if you're an amateur) level of usage, you need to buy equipment that suits your usage case, and not poo-poo and stir everyone up in a frenzy to boycott it.

Honestly this is a good price for what you get compared to what's available currently. It is a low end product, yes, but even those sketchy Orico brand drives aren't this cheap for 2TB.

2
Feb 3, 2025 5:14 PM
611 Comments
Joined Feb 2021
FormerAstronutFeb 3, 2025 5:14 PM
611 Comments
Quote from mfour :
Both are storage devices. I value my data, and this one isn't cheap enough to be worth it.
Are you willing to use the drive past the 5 year warranty period? Because it's basically the same thing you're arguing if you value your data. And if you don't write more than 90TB a year you're not going to get to that TBW "limit" within that 5 year period. So if you're like the astrophotographer who'll reach that limit in 9 years, if you care that much about your data you're willing ot risk 4 years beyond the warranty? Sounds kind of short sighted to me for one who claims your data is precious.

FYI, the most likely case for hitting that TBW mark, is that it stops writing, i.e. you still can move your data as necessary, and as someone who had hard drives fail, there is no "wait let me get my stuff" moment. The reality is there's not a lot of information out on this, because no one ever gets to that point of failure for these drives.

Now if you are in fact a "power user" who does write that much data to drives, then I agree with you completely, that you need to look to other tools that fits your lifestyle.
1
Feb 3, 2025 5:43 PM
1.5K Comments
Joined Dec 2010
yuyakFeb 3, 2025 5:43 PM
1.5K Comments
Quote from estacionsj :
Will this work good in a PS5
Quote from HilariousCaribou423 :
Same question, however I know a heatsink would be required.. but the downvotes suggest it won't?
Not an expert, but I believe PS5 requires minimum 5,500MB/second. I'm looking for a 2TB drive to add to my system too.
Feb 3, 2025 6:08 PM
540 Comments
Joined Sep 2015
spiffytexanFeb 3, 2025 6:08 PM
540 Comments
I had a QLC NAND drive from Team Group (a moderately reputable brand) that was a scam. It was previously TLC that they swapped to QLC without telling anyone.

Write speed dropped to 5-10 MEGABYTES while I was setting up my PC, installing programs, and transferring files.

It was going to take multiple DAYS for all the data to transfer. Programs were stuck installing for HOURS.

QLC may be fine for grandma, but for any kind of a moderate power user, no. Its not worth the $20 savings to get a much much worse QLC drive. Pony up the few extra bucks for TLC or buy used.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 3, 2025 6:16 PM
1.9K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
Dicka24Feb 3, 2025 6:16 PM
1.9K Comments
Quote from yuyak :
Not an expert, but I believe PS5 requires minimum 5,500MB/second. I'm looking for a 2TB drive to add to my system too.
That's Sony's recommendation. A slower drive still works according to posts I've read online from people who've used them. I'm going to hold out for the 482 which everyone recommends for the PS5. Hopefully it'll be in stock and discounted soon.

Join The Conversation

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Related Deals

Sponsored

Popular Deals

Trending Deals