expired
Prime Members: GMKtec Mini PC: Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, M7 Oculink
$347
$460
24% off
+ Free Shippingat Amazon
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
+ Free Shippingat AmazonDeal Details
Update: This popular deal is available again
GMKtec-US via Amazon has for Prime Members: GMKtec Small Form Factor Mini Gaming PC on sale for $369.99 - $23 clippable coupon = $346.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Dr.Wajahat for finding this deal.
Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically for one-time use.
Specs:
GMKtec-US via Amazon has for Prime Members: GMKtec Small Form Factor Mini Gaming PC on sale for $369.99 - $23 clippable coupon = $346.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Dr.Wajahat for finding this deal.
Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically for one-time use.
Specs:
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 8-Core Processor
- 16GB DDR5 4800Mhz Memory
- 512GB PCIe Solid State Drive
- AMD Radeon 680M Integrated Graphics
- Dual NIC Intel i226V 2.5Gbps + WiFi 6 + Bluetooth 5.2
- Windows 11 Pro
- Ports:
- 2x USB 4 Type-C
- 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2
- USB 2.0
- 1x HDMI 2.1
- 1x DisplayPort 2.0
- 1x M7 Oculink
Editor's Notes
Written by SubZero5 | Staff- Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
- If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This popular deal is available again
GMKtec-US via Amazon has for Prime Members: GMKtec Small Form Factor Mini Gaming PC on sale for $369.99 - $23 clippable coupon = $346.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Dr.Wajahat for finding this deal.
Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically for one-time use.
Specs:
GMKtec-US via Amazon has for Prime Members: GMKtec Small Form Factor Mini Gaming PC on sale for $369.99 - $23 clippable coupon = $346.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Dr.Wajahat for finding this deal.
Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically for one-time use.
Specs:
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 8-Core Processor
- 16GB DDR5 4800Mhz Memory
- 512GB PCIe Solid State Drive
- AMD Radeon 680M Integrated Graphics
- Dual NIC Intel i226V 2.5Gbps + WiFi 6 + Bluetooth 5.2
- Windows 11 Pro
- Ports:
- 2x USB 4 Type-C
- 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2
- USB 2.0
- 1x HDMI 2.1
- 1x DisplayPort 2.0
- 1x M7 Oculink
Editor's Notes
Written by SubZero5 | Staff- Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
- If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Community Voting
Deal
Score
+78
Good Deal
Bad Deal
Top Comments
If anyone wants to try this with a (mini) PC without an OCuLink port, but with a spare M.2 slot, you can try looking for an adapter like a "F4C". This converts an M.2 slot, which is really a PCIe x4 slot, into an OCuLink port.
(I believe the BK7, F9G, and F4C are all made by the manufacturer "ADT". But you'll find a lot if listings on places like Amazon and AliExpress just list the model name. So just search for those.)
In reality, study after study shows that consumers in the receiving country bear most of the cost. According to Amiti et al. (2020) and Fajgelbaum et al. (2020), U.S. consumers absorbed nearly 100% of the cost of the tariffs imposed during the U.S.-China trade war under Trump's first administration. Feng, Han, and Li (2023) found U.S. importers bore 93% of U.S.-imposed tariffs. The numbers are remarkably consistent across time and geography: under normal conditions, consumers absorb between 60% and 90% of the cost. That's the economic consensus, not a debate.
Happy to list more studies if you're actually curious:
Amiti et al. (2020) – Who's Paying for the US Tariffs?
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?i...p.
Fajgelbaum et al. (2020) – The Economic Impacts of the US–China Trade War
https://www.nber.org/system/files...w29315.
Feng, Han, and Li (2023) – Asymmetric Tariff Pass-Through Between China and the US
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/wh...ina-and-us
Hayakawa (2017) – Asymmetric Tariff Pass-Through to Trade Prices
https://ideas.repec.org/p/jet/dpa...er631.htm
Bown & Crowley (2013) – Import Protection, Business Cycles, and Exchange Rates
https://econpapers.repe
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
119 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Lots of reports of them just ignoring you after you need warranty repair help.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
In reality, study after study shows that consumers in the receiving country bear most of the cost. According to Amiti et al. (2020) and Fajgelbaum et al. (2020), U.S. consumers absorbed nearly 100% of the cost of the tariffs imposed during the U.S.-China trade war under Trump's first administration. Feng, Han, and Li (2023) found U.S. importers bore 93% of U.S.-imposed tariffs. The numbers are remarkably consistent across time and geography: under normal conditions, consumers absorb between 60% and 90% of the cost. That's the economic consensus, not a debate.
Happy to list more studies if you're actually curious:
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?i...p.
https://www.nber.org/system/files...w29315.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/wh...ina-and-us
https://ideas.repec.org/p/jet/dpa...er631.htm
https://econpapers.repe
In reality, study after study shows that consumers in the receiving country bear most of the cost. According to Amiti et al. (2020) and Fajgelbaum et al. (2020), U.S. consumers absorbed nearly 100% of the cost of the tariffs imposed during the U.S.-China trade war under Trump's first administration. Feng, Han, and Li (2023) found U.S. importers bore 93% of U.S.-imposed tariffs. The numbers are remarkably consistent across time and geography: under normal conditions, consumers absorb between 60% and 90% of the cost. That's the economic consensus, not a debate.
Happy to list more studies if you're actually curious:
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?i...p.
https://www.nber.org/system/files...w29315.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/wh...ina-and-us
https://ideas.repec.org/p/jet/dpa...er631.htm
https://econpapers.repe
That said, Plex has made it seem like amd support is "as-is" and doesn't seem to get as much focus as Intel.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Tarriffs aren't paid by the companies shipping, they are paid by the recipient. You could say the vendor could reduce their prices to offset costs but even then there's only so much wiggle room. Much of the electronic space has razor thin margins, with the intent being to make money by selling large quantities vs high margins.
But for the sake of argument, let's say this item has high margins. Let's imagine this mini PC costs the vendor $200 their cost to produce one unit. Proposed tarriffs on China are 125-245%. Let's go with the smaller #.
Even if the vendor decided they would sell it at cost and make zero profit, the importer would have to pay $250 tarriffs per unit, meaning to sell it at cost it would need to sell for $450, that's if both the vendor and reseller wanted to make zero profit, which is obviously unrealistic.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!