Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum thread Posted by phoinix | Staff • 3d ago
forum thread Posted by phoinix | Staff • 3d ago

from $207: Intel Core Ultra Desktop Processors at Amazon

$207

$231

10% off
Amazon
6 Comments 2,039 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has Intel Core Ultra Desktop Processors for $207.
Shipping is free.
Price
$24 lower (10% savings) than the list price of $231

amazon.com/dp/B0DT7CW7VR [amazon.com]

My other deals
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has Intel Core Ultra Desktop Processors for $207.
Shipping is free.
Price
$24 lower (10% savings) than the list price of $231

amazon.com/dp/B0DT7CW7VR [amazon.com]

My other deals

Community Voting

Deal Score
+5
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225F 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.9 GHz

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 5/1/2025, 01:01 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$207
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

6 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

3d ago
586 Posts
Joined Aug 2011
3d ago
mrtramplefoot
3d ago
586 Posts
At least for the 265s, you're almost certainly better off buying a newegg bundle with a motherboard. Example with asrock z890 pro-a wifi https://www.newegg.com/Product/Co...bo.4772221

I got the bundle with the pro-a non wifi a few weeks ago and it's been fantastic
2d ago
38 Posts
Joined Apr 2019
2d ago
random_logic_
2d ago
38 Posts
Most gamers better off buying Ryzen 5 9600X for $185 on [Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenT...229&sr=1-1) at the moment. Still an Ultra ripoff at this price.
2d ago
45 Posts
Joined Nov 2020
2d ago
Uneternal
2d ago
45 Posts
Quote from random_logic_ :
Most gamers better off buying Ryzen 5 9600X for $185 on [Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/AMD-RyzenT...229&sr=1-1) at the moment. Still an Ultra ripoff at this price.
But Intel's better for productivity. The Core Ultra 235 ties with the Ryzen in single core performance and smokes it in multicore due to its 14 cores. And some boards are also cheaper (Asrock for instance), so you end up with maybe paying $35 more for Intel which is reasonable considering it delivers +25% better multicore performance in PassMark (which is even a bit higher than a Ryzen 9800X3D).
2d ago
38 Posts
Joined Apr 2019
2d ago
random_logic_
2d ago
38 Posts
Quote from Uneternal :
But Intel's better for productivity. The Core Ultra 235 ties with the Ryzen in single core performance and smokes it in multicore due to its 14 cores. And some boards are also cheaper (Asrock for instance), so you end up with maybe paying $35 more for Intel which is reasonable considering it delivers +25% better multicore performance in PassMark (which is even a bit higher than a Ryzen 9800X3D).
Yes, you are correct. if you are doing productivity then it can be a good purchase. I'd definitely check benchmarks for specific applications before deciding, because I heard it can be a mixed bag of results according to Linus Tech Tips. In some productivity benchmarks, Intel's own 14th gen CPUs beats the Ultra CPUs.
2d ago
45 Posts
Joined Nov 2020
2d ago
Uneternal
2d ago
45 Posts
Quote from random_logic_ :
Yes, you are correct. if you are doing productivity then it can be a good purchase. I'd definitely check benchmarks for specific applications before deciding, because I heard it can be a mixed bag of results according to Linus Tech Tips. In some productivity benchmarks, Intel's own 14th gen CPUs beats the Ultra CPUs.
True, but what these reviewers often leave out is that the 14th gen also draws more power. The 235 runs with 65W (Turbo 121W). While the comparable 14600K sucks 125W / 181W. That's almost double the power draw for approximately the same performance. Which is also something that gamers might not care for, but more important for a silent system where you work on.
1
Yesterday
38 Posts
Joined Apr 2019
Yesterday
random_logic_
Yesterday
38 Posts
Quote from Uneternal :
True, but what these reviewers often leave out is that the 14th gen also draws more power. The 235 runs with 65W (Turbo 121W). While the comparable 14600K sucks 125W / 181W. That's almost double the power draw for approximately the same performance. Which is also something that gamers might not care for, but more important for a silent system where you work on.
Electricity matters depending on where you live and how much you use the machine. I'm from California, where electricity prices can be as bad as 50+ cents per kW. Those people should be more concerned about power draw compared to those who live in an area where electricity only costs 10 cents per kW. Also those running it 24/7 as a server should be more concerned than a gamer playing 2 hours / day. Some professionals also need a quiet machine and lower wattage CPUs can help!

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All