This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
As far as I'm aware all QD OLEDs including the higher end like PG32UCDM all have 250nit SDR. But the peak brightness in HDR and the color vividness more than make up for it. Source: I have a MPG321URX
As far as I'm aware all QD OLEDs including the higher end like PG32UCDM all have 250nit SDR. But the peak brightness in HDR and the color vividness more than make up for it. Source: I have a MPG321URX
It's a bit misleading, especially when using two different measurements in one specification. The 250 nits is at 100% white screen. The 1000 nits (max) HDR is with like a few pixels at 1000 nits. The more bright pixels, the lower the max nits. So on the one hand they say 250 nits SDR with an entire white screen but then say 1000 nits HDR with a tiny portion being bright. How about stating SDR nits with a similar spec as HDR?
As an owner of a PG32UCDM, I tend to use darker wallpapers and browsers displaying white screens at less than full screen so as to increase the brightness (it's very bright even at that).
But I do now agree that the 250 nits spec is common, but it is not a fair spec to put right next to a 1000 nit HDR spec.
4 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As an owner of a PG32UCDM, I tend to use darker wallpapers and browsers displaying white screens at less than full screen so as to increase the brightness (it's very bright even at that).
But I do now agree that the 250 nits spec is common, but it is not a fair spec to put right next to a 1000 nit HDR spec.