Newegg has AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT 16-Core / 32-Thread AM4 Desktop Processor (100-100001581WOF) + 32GB (2 x 16GB)Corsair Vengeance LPX 288-Pin PC DDR4 3200 Memory Kit (CMK32GX4M2E3200C16) on sale for $263. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member redlikemethodz for sharing this deal.
Note: The Corsair memory will be automatically added to your cart.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Newegg has AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT 16-Core / 32-Thread AM4 Desktop Processor (100-100001581WOF) + 32GB (2 x 16GB)Corsair Vengeance LPX 288-Pin PC DDR4 3200 Memory Kit (CMK32GX4M2E3200C16) on sale for $263. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member redlikemethodz for sharing this deal.
Note: The Corsair memory will be automatically added to your cart.
Just a heads up, AMD will release 5500X3D ($150-$200). So, this will be another good upgrade for those low-budget gaming AM4-Ever CPU LOL. This 6-core CPU will run at 4 GHz, compared to the 5600X3D at 4.4 GHz.
From what I remember, the 5600X3D (6 cores, 4.40GHz) is about neck/neck on gaming when compared to the 5800X3D (8 cores,4.5 GHz) on gaming FPS. The 5700X3D (8 cores, 4.1GHz) is about 4% slower on gaming compared to the 5800X3D. So, the 5500X3D (6 cores, 4.0GHz) will be about the same as the 5700X3D FPS.
I think the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT will still be better for productivity, not for gaming, because it is just an overclocked 5950X.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
20 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Just a heads up, AMD will release 5500X3D ($150-$200). So, this will be another good upgrade for those low-budget gaming AM4-Ever CPU LOL. This 6-core CPU will run at 4 GHz, compared to the 5600X3D at 4.4 GHz.
From what I remember, the 5600X3D (6 cores, 4.40GHz) is about neck/neck on gaming when compared to the 5800X3D (8 cores,4.5 GHz) on gaming FPS. The 5700X3D (8 cores, 4.1GHz) is about 4% slower on gaming compared to the 5800X3D. So, the 5500X3D (6 cores, 4.0GHz) will be about the same as the 5700X3D FPS.
I think the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT will still be better for productivity, not for gaming, because it is just an overclocked 5950X.
I spoke with a representative about price matching with the $229 listing on Amazon. Technically, Newegg only offers this for items marked as "price match guaranteed". However, I was able to secure it, although YMMV.
Just a heads up, AMD will release 5500X3D ($150-$200). So, this will be another good upgrade for those low-budget gaming AM4-Ever CPU LOL. This 6-core CPU will run at 4 GHz, compared to the 5600X3D at 4.4 GHz.From what I remember, the 5600X3D (6 cores, 4.40GHz) is about neck/neck on gaming when compared to the 5800X3D (8 cores,4.5 GHz) on gaming FPS. The 5700X3D (8 cores, 4.1GHz) is about 4% slower on gaming compared to the 5800X3D. So, the 5500X3D (6 cores, 4.0GHz) will be about the same as the 5700X3D FPS. I think the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT will still be better for productivity, not for gaming, because it is just an overclocked 5950X.
5900xt is an underclocked 5950x
boost 4.8ghz vs 4.9ghz
base 3.3ghz vs 3.4ghz
Not much but the order is important.
Edit: might as well round this out. https://www.techpowerup.com/revie...3d/18.html
The 5950x is about 6.6% (7.8% see below) slower than 5800x3d and the 5900xt is about 2% slower than the 5950x. https://www.techspot.com/review/2...n-5800x3d/
The 5600x3d is 6% slower than the 5800x3d.
They're all about the same.
I spoke with a representative about price matching with the $229 listing on Amazon. Technically, Newegg only offers this for items marked as "price match guaranteed". However, I was able to secure it, although YMMV.
Did you go through their price match form or spoke with a rep directly on the phone?
Not to be a stats Nazi, bit that's not 6.6 percent but percentage points. There is a difference. This is also specifically in gaming with a TOTL GPU. The difference narrows as the resolution goes up (and is probably smaller with less powerful GPUs).
In application performance the difference is more like 20% and 30% in favor of the 5900XT and 5950X respectively. That's a big difference.
Not to be a stats Nazi, bit that's not 6.6 percent but percentage points. There is a difference. This is also specifically in gaming with a TOTL GPU. The difference narrows as the resolution goes up (and is probably smaller with less powerful GPUs).In application performance the difference is more like 20% and 30% in favor of the 5900XT and 5950X respectively. That's a big difference.
Not to be a context ~z but the reply was to gaming performance.
My mistake. It's actually 7.8% slower not 6.6%. Sorry about that. It was lazy of me.
I guess you're not a stats ~z because you didn't provide the corrected exact number and you pulled 20% and 30% out of thin air. You do realize that the 5900XT only differs from the 5950X in boost and base by 100mhz. Hard to make 2-3% into a 10% difference respectively or was that just miss phrased ?
You do realize that the 5900XT only differs from the 5950X in boost and base by 100mhz. Hard to make 2-3% into a 10% difference respectively or was that just miss phrased ?
I didn't misphrase it, but, perhaps unintentionally, you are, again. That's about a 10 percentage point difference between the 5900XT and 5950X in respect to the 5800X3D. Among themselves, 5950X is 8.9% faster than 5900XT in application performance (according to the linked article).
I don't possess and have not tested any of the three CPUs. I don't have a skin in the game. I am just reading the charts in the article.
I got these numbers from the same article you linked (Page 27).I didn't misphrase it, but, perhaps unintentionally, you are, again. That's about a 10 percentage point difference between the 5900XT and 5950X in respect to the 5800X3D. Among themselves, 5950X is 8.9% faster than 5900XT in application performance (according to the linked article).I don't possess and have not tested any of the three CPUs. I don't have a skin in the game. I am just reading the charts in the article.
Uhh. 5900x is different than the 5900xt. The former is a 12 core processor, the latter is a lower binned 5950x 16 core processor.
I have a 5800x3d and a 5950x.
5950x advantage is higher quality silicon. So it boosts better so you may get a bit more than the 2-3% especially if you have good cooling.
I spoke with a representative about price matching with the $229 listing on Amazon. Technically, Newegg only offers this for items marked as "price match guaranteed". However, I was able to secure it, although YMMV.
they offered me a gift card. i will pass. did you get a direct discount or a gift card? i think i will just save for an am5 upgrade
I talked with the representative and placed the order for $279. She put some notes in the system. In a few days, after shipping, I talked with another person to confirm the promised price match, then $50 refund was issued to my credit card.
I agree with you that AM5 setup is probably a better investment, unless you have some old AM4 motherboard and need more cores.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
From what I remember, the 5600X3D (6 cores, 4.40GHz) is about neck/neck on gaming when compared to the 5800X3D (8 cores,4.5 GHz) on gaming FPS. The 5700X3D (8 cores, 4.1GHz) is about 4% slower on gaming compared to the 5800X3D. So, the 5500X3D (6 cores, 4.0GHz) will be about the same as the 5700X3D FPS.
I think the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT will still be better for productivity, not for gaming, because it is just an overclocked 5950X.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
20 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
From what I remember, the 5600X3D (6 cores, 4.40GHz) is about neck/neck on gaming when compared to the 5800X3D (8 cores,4.5 GHz) on gaming FPS. The 5700X3D (8 cores, 4.1GHz) is about 4% slower on gaming compared to the 5800X3D. So, the 5500X3D (6 cores, 4.0GHz) will be about the same as the 5700X3D FPS.
I think the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT will still be better for productivity, not for gaming, because it is just an overclocked 5950X.
boost 4.8ghz vs 4.9ghz
base 3.3ghz vs 3.4ghz
Not much but the order is important.
Edit: might as well round this out.
https://www.techpowerup
The 5950x is about 6.6% (7.8% see below) slower than 5800x3d and the 5900xt is about 2% slower than the 5950x.
https://www.techspot.co
The 5600x3d is 6% slower than the 5800x3d.
They're all about the same.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.techpowerup
The 5950x is about 6.6% slower than 5800x3d and the 5900xt is about 2% slower than the 5950x.
In application performance the difference is more like 20% and 30% in favor of the 5900XT and 5950X respectively. That's a big difference.
My mistake. It's actually 7.8% slower not 6.6%. Sorry about that. It was lazy of me.
I guess you're not a stats ~z because you didn't provide the corrected exact number and you pulled 20% and 30% out of thin air. You do realize that the 5900XT only differs from the 5950X in boost and base by 100mhz. Hard to make 2-3% into a 10% difference respectively or was that just miss phrased ?
I don't possess and have not tested any of the three CPUs. I don't have a skin in the game. I am just reading the charts in the article.
I have a 5800x3d and a 5950x.
5950x advantage is higher quality silicon. So it boosts better so you may get a bit more than the 2-3% especially if you have good cooling.
i think i will just save for an am5 upgrade
I agree with you that AM5 setup is probably a better investment, unless you have some old AM4 motherboard and need more cores.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!