Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpageItsSoCheap | Staff posted Sep 08, 2025 04:57 AM
frontpageItsSoCheap | Staff posted Sep 08, 2025 04:57 AM

Kodak Ektar H35N 35mm Half-Frame Film Camera w/ Ultramax 400 Film (5 Colors)

+ Free Shipping w/ Prime

$45

$75

40% off
Woot!
29 Comments 22,493 Views
Get Deal at Woot!
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Woot! has Kodak Ektar H35N 35mm Half-Frame Film Camera w/ Ultramax 400 Film on sale for $44.99. Shipping is free for Amazon Prime Members (must login with your Amazon account and select a shipping address in order for Woot to apply free shipping) or is otherwise $6 per order.

Thanks to Deal Hunter ItsSoCheap for sharing this deal.

Colors Available:
  • Black
  • Silver
  • Pink
  • Green
  • Blue

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff
  • About this Store:
  • Additional Information:
    • Our research indicates that this deal is $25 less (36% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $69.99 at the time of this posting.
    • Rated 4.1 out of 5 stars on Amazon based on over 630 customer reviews.
    • Please see the original post for additional details and/or view the Wiki and forum comments for further helpful discussion if available.

Original Post

Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Woot! has Kodak Ektar H35N 35mm Half-Frame Film Camera w/ Ultramax 400 Film on sale for $44.99. Shipping is free for Amazon Prime Members (must login with your Amazon account and select a shipping address in order for Woot to apply free shipping) or is otherwise $6 per order.

Thanks to Deal Hunter ItsSoCheap for sharing this deal.

Colors Available:
  • Black
  • Silver
  • Pink
  • Green
  • Blue

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff
  • About this Store:
  • Additional Information:
    • Our research indicates that this deal is $25 less (36% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $69.99 at the time of this posting.
    • Rated 4.1 out of 5 stars on Amazon based on over 630 customer reviews.
    • Please see the original post for additional details and/or view the Wiki and forum comments for further helpful discussion if available.

Original Post

Community Voting

Deal Score
+30
Good Deal
Get Deal at Woot!

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

ChristianG4966
64 Posts
18 Reputation
If you want to get into retro photography; get yourself a cheap, old SLR with any basic lens. The 90s-early 2000s era ones are usually super easy to use and way cheaper then this for a much more authentic experience.
tfox
499 Posts
79 Reputation
A film SLR is a completely different animal. It's a bulky, heavy, complicated piece of engineering. Most of what you'll find in a camera shop will be at least 30 years old. Any issues (and they are common enough to be a concern) can easily cost more than the camera is worth to fix.

My .02... if you have no experience in photography and want to play around with settings cheaply, get yourself an older dSLR. The ability to see results immediately and not have to pay and wait for processing are key.

If you just want to dip your toes into film, in particular the half-frame fad, this Kodak is not a bad option at all. There are hardly any settings to mess around with. You could hand it to a six year old and they would quickly figure it out.



Why does it bother you that people like this stuff? So cringe.
redoctoberz
98 Posts
26 Reputation
For me, it's a local photography lab about a mile up the road from my place.

28 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 09, 2025 05:22 AM
218 Posts
Joined May 2017
clc327Sep 09, 2025 05:22 AM
218 Posts
I bit on this one. For less than $50, why not? I already own a Pentax 17. Another half frame won't hurt. I develop my own film so that isn't an issue. From what I've read, this is a fun little camera to carry around and have a great time with. Half frame means you can take shot after shot after shot and still have 90% of the film roll left. You're not getting SLR quality (looks like my mom's 110 shots from the 1970's) but it's charming in its own way. I also read it only needs a battery for the flash. Otherwise it's fully manual.
Sep 09, 2025 05:31 AM
218 Posts
Joined May 2017
clc327Sep 09, 2025 05:31 AM
218 Posts
Quote from Backhome77 :
A lot of people develop themselves. You don't need a full dark room - there are affordable processing kits that can be used on the kitchen table. I haven't used them, but I know people who have and claim it's not that hard.
Yes, it isn't hard to develop film at all. Getting negatives into a digital format can be pricey though. I scan the negatives with a mirrorless digital cam, then import into Lightroom and use Negative Lab Pro to process the scanned image. The cost might be a roadblock to some but you do get the satisfaction of doing it all yourself. I'm sure there are other methods.
Sep 09, 2025 06:06 AM
13 Posts
Joined Mar 2024
OrangeApparel8401Sep 09, 2025 06:06 AM
13 Posts
Quote from ChristianG4966 :
If you want to get into retro photography; get yourself a cheap, old SLR with any basic lens. The 90s-early 2000s era ones are usually super easy to use and way cheaper then this for a much more authentic experience.
Authentic to what? Using a professional camera? Absolutely? But this is a point and shoot. Which is also an authentic experience. And it shoots twice as many photos per roll, which is huge because film is expensive now and you'll have no excuse to not be taking more pictures.
1
Sep 09, 2025 06:07 AM
13 Posts
Joined Mar 2024
OrangeApparel8401Sep 09, 2025 06:07 AM
13 Posts
Quote from harley48 :
Where do you get processing and printing anymore?
Your local lab. Chances are there's one nearby. If not, google will tell you where to mail your film.
Sep 09, 2025 02:44 PM
247 Posts
Joined Dec 2015
rbross3030Sep 09, 2025 02:44 PM
247 Posts
Definitely try to take your film somewhere that will return the negatives, they are the actual film you shot on and the only way to make more prints without generational loss. Here in Rochester your best bet is Scott by Rowe but as others mentioned there are local labs in most cities that can do a fine job.

Also, FWIW I own several SLR cameras, 1 was my father's and the others I've purchased over the years on ebay and at my LCS and none of them have any of the issues others mentioned here, they all work perfectly fine. Minolta, Pentax, Olympus -- all great brands. I would encourage anyone curious to dive in and have fun with it, the feeling of shooting film on a heavy metal camera with great mechanics and build quality is second to none and can't be replicated by a DSLR. DSLRs are great for so many reasons but some of that SOVL was certainly lost in the advancement of technology. Good luck!
Sep 09, 2025 04:40 PM
481 Posts
Joined Jan 2013
tonymontana444Sep 09, 2025 04:40 PM
481 Posts
Quote from clc327 :
Yes, it isn't hard to develop film at all. Getting negatives into a digital format can be pricey though. I scan the negatives with a mirrorless digital cam, then import into Lightroom and use Negative Lab Pro to process the scanned image. The cost might be a roadblock to some but you do get the satisfaction of doing it all yourself. I'm sure there are other methods.
Just some old darkroom knowledge... Hopefully you can roll your film on the spool properly before developing or you will lose pictures from touching the film together against itself on the spool. this technique takes time to grasp and I suggest rolling film that doesn't have your best pics until you get used to it.
Sep 09, 2025 07:01 PM
427 Posts
Joined Nov 2015
Riddle.Me.ThisSep 09, 2025 07:01 PM
427 Posts
Quote from Backhome77 :
Most metro areas still have camera shops that processes film. Not many of them. It's a dying breed. But you can still find one or two in most mid to large cities, and in college towns.

A lot of people develop themselves. You don't need a full dark room - there are affordable processing kits that can be used on the kitchen table. I haven't used them, but I know people who have and claim it's not that hard.

There are plenty of services online where you can mail film in to get processed.

If all else fails, I'm pretty sure Wally World (Walmart) still develops film. A lot of Walgreens locations do, too. CVS doesn't do any on-site development. It's all mailed to one processing plant, then back to the local store. So it might take two or three weeks depending on where you live.

So, still lots of options. Just have to be a little more patient than we were back in the one hour photo days.
If you are just getting into this as a "hobby", my recommendations:

- If you want to process at home, I'd start off with B&W film instead of color negative. It's a lot more forgiving and in general requires one less step (but there are exceptions).
- If you are mailing it out to get processed, I would look at slide film instead of color negative. You won't get prints, but you can scan the slides at home using a scanner or camera adapter. Once you compare slides with color negatives, you won't want to go back, unless you are want for that color-negative "look".

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 10, 2025 01:08 AM
561 Posts
Joined Sep 2012
DataJagerSep 10, 2025 01:08 AM
561 Posts
A point and shoot camera, no lens, in 2025, for almost $50? No, hard pass. Ask your grandma if she has one, she probably does. At least try to get something with a basic lens
Sep 10, 2025 01:10 AM
561 Posts
Joined Sep 2012
DataJagerSep 10, 2025 01:10 AM
561 Posts
Quote from OrangeApparel8401 :
Authentic to what? Using a professional camera? Absolutely? But this is a point and shoot. Which is also an authentic experience. And it shoots twice as many photos per roll, which is huge because film is expensive now and you'll have no excuse to not be taking more pictures.
Your phone is also a point and shoot. If you're gonna do this hobby you might as well use a lens. With a lens you'll learn things like aperture and why your phone takes lousy pictures
Sep 10, 2025 09:05 PM
2,547 Posts
Joined Nov 2008
spaderSep 10, 2025 09:05 PM
2,547 Posts
Quote from CollegeRamenEat :
the Eastman Kodak name got scooped up by some Chinese concern. Expect quality to match.

A Chinese company purchased Kodak Alaris's paper and chemistry division.

The core American-based film and photographic products company, Eastman Kodak, is not Chinese-owned and is headquartered in Rochester, New York.
Sep 11, 2025 02:29 AM
1,607 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
TollerSep 11, 2025 02:29 AM
1,607 Posts
Quote from jimx200 :
old slr's very often have a leaky light seal and they cost time and money to replace if even possible. While I love my old Pentax SE Super, Canon A1, and a Minolta/Ricoh slrs, they are all heavy and bulky, and even more so with a flash on top. They have their place for sure, but these Kodak's do a great job with grabbing a nice image so effortlessly and are super light and compact. Nothing digital comes close to the look of film.
You might love it, but it is still an ME Super.

You can degrade the image if you want your digital to look like film.
Sep 11, 2025 04:06 AM
10,051 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
jimx200Sep 11, 2025 04:06 AM
10,051 Posts
Quote from Toller :
Quote from jimx200 [IMG]https://slickdeals.net/images/misc/backlink.gif[/IMG] :
old slr's very often have a leaky light seal and they cost time and money to replace if even possible. While I love my old Pentax SE Super, Canon A1, and a Minolta/Ricoh slrs, they are all heavy and bulky, and even more so with a flash on top. They have their place for sure, but these Kodak's do a great job with grabbing a nice image so effortlessly and are super light and compact. Nothing digital comes close to the look of film.
You might love it, but it is still an ME Super.

You can degrade the image if you want your digital to look like film.
what are you saying? No software cannot manipulate a jpeg or raw file to look like film. I shot film for 25 years, worked for a newspaper in the late 70's-1982 shooting events so well familiar with ilford, Fuji and Kodak film. I shoot today with numerous digital cameras.
Sep 15, 2025 10:20 PM
2,010 Posts
Joined Apr 2006
ratbastardSep 15, 2025 10:20 PM
2,010 Posts
Kodak invented digital photography and failed to capitalize on the technology. Now it's trying to get people back into old technology.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All