Amazon has for
Prime Members: 49" Samsung Odyssey G93SC OLED 240Hz Ultrawide Curved Monitor (Aluminum Silver, LS49CG932SNXZA) +
Earn 10% Back w/ Amazon Prime Visa [
Details] on sale for
$879.99.
Shipping is free.
Note: Earn 10% back on this item when you pay with your Prime Visa.
Thanks to Deal Hunter
tDames for finding this deal.
Specs: - Resolution: 5120x1440 (Dual QHD)
- Response Time (GTG): 0.03ms
- Refresh Rate: 240Hz
- Screen Curvature: 1800R
- Panel Type: OLED
- Contrast Ratio: 1,000,000:1
- FreeSync Premium Pro/G-Sync Compatible
- 2-Channel/5W Speaker Audio
- Ports:
- 3x USB 3.0 Hub (2x downstream, 1x upstream)
- 1x HDMI 2.1
- 1x Micro HDMI 2.1
- 1x DisplayPort 1.4
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
21 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank TenseApple583
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CDQMQQS2
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank az060693
This is the same as the G95SC but without the TV OS. That's a benefit in some ways and a negative in others since its more annoying to install updates.
This is the same as the G95SC but without the TV OS. That's a benefit in some ways and a negative in others since its more annoying to install updates.
I am not able to replicate this deal through the EDU
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I was contemplating this monitor, but rtings.com seems to like the Dell UltraSharp U4025QW and that has a 4K resolution which is a huge step up over 1440p.
What do you guys think between this monitor and that one?
I was contemplating this monitor, but rtings.com seems to like the Dell UltraSharp U4025QW and that has a 4K resolution which is a huge step up over 1440p.
What do you guys think between this monitor and that one?
Get the G9 if you want OLED picture quality and are ok with OLED drawbacks. Get the Ultrasharp if you need it for productivity. Get the 57" Samsung if you want a compromise between both (still worse picture quality than OLED but much better for media than the Ultrasharp).
Aspect ratio is very different and the Dell is an IPS.
I'm not a gamer, but I value fast screen response, vivid colors, and good imagery.
I was contemplating this monitor, but rtings.com seems to like the Dell UltraSharp U4025QW and that has a 4K resolution which is a huge step up over 1440p.
What do you guys think between this monitor and that one?
Very different monitors, apples to oranges and aimed at very different markets. The RTINGS review really tells you all you need to know. IPS, bad response time despite 120hz, very poor local dimming (and HDR). It's better calibrated and better suited for office and professional work, which is what it's targeted at.
Get the G9 if you want OLED picture quality and are ok with OLED drawbacks. Get the Ultrasharp if you need it for productivity. Get the 57" Samsung if you want a compromise between both (still worse picture quality than OLED but much better for media than the Ultrasharp).
Aspect ratio is very different and the Dell is an IPS.
Quote from jwhzg [IMG]https://slickdeals.net/images/misc/backlink.gif[/IMG] :
I'm not a gamer, but I value fast screen response, vivid colors, and good imagery.
I was contemplating this monitor, but rtings.com seems to like the Dell UltraSharp U4025QW and that has a 4K resolution which is a huge step up over 1440p.
What do you guys think between this monitor and that one?
Very different monitors, apples to oranges and aimed at very different markets. The RTINGS review really tells you all you need to know. IPS, bad response time despite 120hz, very poor local dimming (and HDR). It's better calibrated and better suited for office and professional work, which is what it's targeted at.
Get the G9 if you want OLED picture quality and are ok with OLED drawbacks. Get the Ultrasharp if you need it for productivity. Get the 57" Samsung if you want a compromise between both (still worse picture quality than OLED but much better for media than the Ultrasharp).
Aspect ratio is very different and the Dell is an IPS.
Speaking of the 57" I bought mine for 550 open box the other day.
If you want my final verdict. I'd say wait if you are looking for the ultimate monitor. 1440 pixels isn't enough vertical space and the PPI is at an awkward level for hidpi usage.
But for games and general use, it's nice. I'm just picky. I'd be a lot happier if this was 900R curve sized like two 32 inch 4k monitors.
The lack of curve on these double wides is annoying. There's barely a curve at all which makes it less usable when sitting close.
how is the ppi vs qled
It ain't bad, but the 32 inch 4k's are nicer. I use the 4k's with my windows PC and a 91 like this 93 with my mac. On Mac with 125% scale it feels decent - though I have to use side by side double inputs to use that smaller scaling factor.
If you want my final verdict. I'd say wait if you are looking for the ultimate monitor. 1440 pixels isn't enough vertical space and the PPI is at an awkward level for hidpi usage.
But for games and general use, it's nice. I'm just picky. I'd be a lot happier if this was 900R curve sized like two 32 inch 4k monitors.
The lack of curve on these double wides is annoying. There's barely a curve at all which makes it less usable when sitting close.
IMO mini-led 4k at 32in is pretty great, or like someone else mentioned go up to 57in for an increase in PPI.
I noticed that recently the Samsung 57" Odyssey Neo G9 (G95NC) went on sale for $1500 on Amazon (it was over 2k back in April) so that might be the next best option?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
IMO mini-led 4k at 32in is pretty great, or like someone else mentioned go up to 57in for an increase in PPI.
I noticed that recently the Samsung 57" Odyssey Neo G9 (G95NC) went on sale for $1500 on Amazon (it was over 2k back in April) so that might be the next best option?
Leave a Comment