Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
popularf12_26 | Staff posted Oct 26, 2025 11:47 PM
popularf12_26 | Staff posted Oct 26, 2025 11:47 PM

ORICO Daisy Chain 4 Bay USB 3.2 Gen 2 Aluminum Das Hard Drive Enclosure $146.29 + Free Shipping

$146

$209

30% off
Amazon
16 Comments 4,880 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
ORICO Direct US Store via Amazon [amazon.com] has their Daisy Chain 4 Bay USB 3.2 Gen 2 Aluminum Das Hard Drive Enclosure on sale for 208.99 - $62.70 w/ code 9948C3USSV = $146.29. Shipping is free
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
ORICO Direct US Store via Amazon [amazon.com] has their Daisy Chain 4 Bay USB 3.2 Gen 2 Aluminum Das Hard Drive Enclosure on sale for 208.99 - $62.70 w/ code 9948C3USSV = $146.29. Shipping is free

Community Voting

Deal Score
+8
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

16 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 27, 2025 12:59 AM
645 Posts
Joined Feb 2015
bearstampedeOct 27, 2025 12:59 AM
645 Posts
I love paying $450 to daisychain 264TB of storage across 12 spinning disks & limiting the bandwidth to 10gbps.

P.S. The OP should be corrected to say USB 3.1 Gen 2.
1
3
3
Oct 27, 2025 02:25 AM
27 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
nimble7Oct 27, 2025 02:25 AM
27 Posts
Quote from bearstampede :
I love paying $450 to daisychain 264TB of storage across 12 spinning disks & limiting the bandwidth to 10gbps.

P.S. The OP should be corrected to say USB 3.1 Gen 2.
Would you mind elaborating? I'm new to this.
Oct 27, 2025 02:30 AM
757 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
TMA-1Oct 27, 2025 02:30 AM
757 Posts
"Support up to 22 TB 3.5-inch SATA hard disks and max up to 88TB capacity" - the 22TB per bay max limit should be taken in to account when thinking about longer term needs, 26 and 28TB drives are coming down in price
1
Oct 27, 2025 02:52 AM
3 Posts
Joined Mar 2022
DanLouie2015Oct 27, 2025 02:52 AM
3 Posts
Quote from nimble7 :
Would you mind elaborating? I'm new to this.
I think you can have multiple das and can daisy chain them using usb port. He saying it probably too slow using usb port because of bandwidth restriction.
1
Oct 27, 2025 06:44 AM
645 Posts
Joined Feb 2015
bearstampedeOct 27, 2025 06:44 AM
645 Posts
Quote from nimble7 :
Would you mind elaborating? I'm new to this.
10Gbps (gigabits/sec) isn't very fast, that's about 1.25 gigabytes/sec; Thunderbolt 4 can push 40Gbps or 8 gigabytes/sec. If you max one of these out, even if you were able to hit theoretical speeds of 10Gbps (you never will for many reasons) it's still 20 hours to transfer off that data, and that's the best case scenario & assumes ALL data is sequential (it never will be) there's no fragmentation (there will be), you're accessing all 4 drives simultaneously (possible if you configure the drives in RAID, but not otherwise AFAIK).

A more realistic estimate is 30 hours PER DRIVE, since SATA read speeds max out at like 300MB/s (theoretically, ONLY if the data is sequential—and it rarely will be) so you can't even come close to the 10Gbps ceiling unless you force concurrent reads across all 4 drives through RAID or some other 3rd party method (this is probably why they didn't bother with anything higher than USB 3.1 Gen 2). You could get the speeds a bit higher with SSDs, but you'll be looking at around $10k for 60TB enterprise SSDs or ~$2400-4000 for 32TB of consumer/prosumer storage.
2
2
Oct 27, 2025 06:48 AM
645 Posts
Joined Feb 2015
bearstampedeOct 27, 2025 06:48 AM
645 Posts
Quote from DanLouie2015 :
I think you can have multiple das and can daisy chain them using usb port. He saying it probably too slow using usb port because of bandwidth restriction.
This, but the problem is bad enough even with 1 unit. Daisychaining them makes it worse depending on how you have the drives configured (JBOD "just a bunch of disks" vs RAID)—but even the best-case scenario is bad because it's still SATA drives transferring data over USB.

This might be fine for a normal person without deadlines, but they're pretending these are good for scalability when they're simply not. You could argue it depends on what your idea of "scale" is, but if you're not consistently dealing with well over 50TB of data I'm not sure how this unit makes more sense than a NAS that is network accessible. The LAST thing you want is for the storage device itself to be the bottleneck, and 10Gbps is a pretty low ceiling. With a NAS you could have resources across all 4 disks being accessed by multiple people at all times—the ceiling would still be the drive read speed, but at least you're not hammering ONE machine's data I/O over a single USB port.

I guess I'm being overly critical, but it still bugs me—they even marketed it to Apple people who (no offense) wouldn't have any reason to know any better. Given the price & specs, I would have absolutely zero patience if this enclosure had even ONE issue—especially given that it would be storing my data.
1
3
Oct 27, 2025 06:55 AM
3 Posts
Joined Mar 2022
DanLouie2015Oct 27, 2025 06:55 AM
3 Posts
Quote from bearstampede :
This, but the problem is bad enough even with 1 unit. Daisychaining them makes it worse depending on how you have the drives configured (JBOD "just a bunch of disks" vs RAID)—but even the best-case scenario is bad because it's still SATA drives transferring data over USB. This might be fine for a normal people, but it's the extra features that bother me because they're pretending these are good for scalability. It depends on what you're idea of "scale" is, but if you're not dealing with well over 50TB of data I'm not sure how this unit makes more sense than a NAS that is network accessible.
Gotcha makes sense
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 27, 2025 09:02 AM
221 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
CleverWeather6968Oct 27, 2025 09:02 AM
221 Posts
Quote from bearstampede :
10Gbps (gigabits/sec) isn't very fast, that's about 1.25 gigabytes/sec; Thunderbolt 4 can push 40Gbps or 8 gigabytes/sec. If you max one of these out, even if you were able to hit theoretical speeds of 10Gbps (you never will for many reasons) it's still 20 hours to transfer off that data, and that's the best case scenario & assumes ALL data is sequential (it never will be) there's no fragmentation (there will be), you're accessing all 4 drives simultaneously (possible if you configure the drives in RAID, but not otherwise AFAIK).

A more realistic estimate is 30 hours PER DRIVE, since SATA read speeds max out at like 300MB/s (theoretically, ONLY if the data is sequential—and it rarely will be) so you can't even come close to the 10Gbps ceiling unless you force concurrent reads across all 4 drives through RAID or some other 3rd party method (this is probably why they didn't bother with anything higher than USB 3.1 Gen 2). You could get the speeds a bit higher with SSDs, but you'll be looking at around $10k for 60TB enterprise SSDs or ~$2400-4000 for 32TB of consumer/prosumer storage.
Why does it even matter ? the specification loaded jargons its like saying we can't travel at speed of light so we should stop exploring ! I understand the adv gimmicks by these orgs, but for home server usage or even diy NAS its more than enough we are not an enterprise working with quantum computing & many have just gigabit home internet connection that's merely 300-500 mbps can't even take advantage of docsis 3.1 that too shared neighbourhood. With all these constraints For home diy NAS you hardly get past 50 mbps of upload speed & 100-150 mbps of downloads. A normal use case user would be fine with these I don't see any thing better offered at the budget with competition.
3
Oct 27, 2025 02:40 PM
335 Posts
Joined Oct 2006
YwVJZXkDOct 27, 2025 02:40 PM
335 Posts
Quote from CleverWeather6968 :
Why does it even matter ? the specification loaded jargons its like saying we can't travel at speed of light so we should stop exploring ! I understand the adv gimmicks by these orgs, but for home server usage or even diy NAS its more than enough we are not an enterprise working with quantum computing & many have just gigabit home internet connection that's merely 300-500 mbps can't even take advantage of docsis 3.1 that too shared neighbourhood. With all these constraints For home diy NAS you hardly get past 50 mbps of upload speed & 100-150 mbps of downloads. A normal use case user would be fine with these I don't see any thing better offered at the budget with competition.
What this guy says. I used to be pro NAS anti DAS until I started virtualizing my NAS. Then passing through a DAS just make more sense, more flexibility. Regardless, this is a decent price on this particular DAS. Although, yes going up to thunderbolt 4 40Gbps would be of course better.
1
2
Oct 27, 2025 05:50 PM
2 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
Kingsley10Oct 27, 2025 05:50 PM
2 Posts
I saw 177$ with discount. Not 146
Original Poster
Pro
Staff
Oct 27, 2025 07:12 PM
35,969 Posts
Joined Apr 2014
f12_26Oct 27, 2025 07:12 PM
Original Poster
Pro
Staff
35,969 Posts
Quote from Kingsley10 :
I saw 177$ with discount. Not 146
Use the code provided on the post
Oct 28, 2025 01:21 AM
652 Posts
Joined Nov 2022
CleverCreature256Oct 28, 2025 01:21 AM
652 Posts
Quote from bearstampede :
10Gbps (gigabits/sec) isn't very fast, that's about 1.25 gigabytes/sec; Thunderbolt 4 can push 40Gbps or 8 gigabytes/sec. If you max one of these out, even if you were able to hit theoretical speeds of 10Gbps (you never will for many reasons) it's still 20 hours to transfer off that data, and that's the best case scenario & assumes ALL data is sequential (it never will be) there's no fragmentation (there will be), you're accessing all 4 drives simultaneously (possible if you configure the drives in RAID, but not otherwise AFAIK).

A more realistic estimate is 30 hours PER DRIVE, since SATA read speeds max out at like 300MB/s (theoretically, ONLY if the data is sequential—and it rarely will be) so you can't even come close to the 10Gbps ceiling unless you force concurrent reads across all 4 drives through RAID or some other 3rd party method (this is probably why they didn't bother with anything higher than USB 3.1 Gen 2). You could get the speeds a bit higher with SSDs, but you'll be looking at around $10k for 60TB enterprise SSDs or ~$2400-4000 for 32TB of consumer/prosumer storage.
I'm just a backwoods Luddite and only have 25 Gpbs networking (spf28 DAC). I have to upgrade my Plex as it's limited to 4K, how do I leapfrog 8K to ensure I'm future proofed to 256K? I want to buy the TV this Black Friday.
Oct 28, 2025 06:22 AM
2,061 Posts
Joined Feb 2008
mikejnpcOct 28, 2025 06:22 AM
2,061 Posts
Is this able to be integrated with other devices, like SYN NAS ?

oh and there is nothing wrong with spinning rust ... except if your going to pay 1k for 8tb, company pays then who cares.. lol
Oct 29, 2025 03:11 AM
621 Posts
Joined Mar 2016
darkxssOct 29, 2025 03:11 AM
621 Posts
Main reason I'm looking for a DAS is Apple only lets you save photos locally to the internal or an external connected directly. So it will not save to a NAS.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 03:51 AM
94 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
DingeringedingToday 03:51 AM
94 Posts
Quote from bearstampede :
I love paying $450 to daisychain 264TB of storage across 12 spinning disks & limiting the bandwidth to 10gbps.

P.S. The OP should be corrected to say USB 3.1 Gen 2.
How many feet pics can fit on 264 TB of HDD?

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals