Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
Dr.W 73.8K Views
Nov 6, 2025 11:09 PM

Prime Members: Kamrui E3B Mini PC: Ryzen 5 7430U, 32GB DDR4, 512GB SSD

$264

$400

34% off
+ Free Shippingat Amazon
Visit Amazon

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
103Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Update: This popular offer is still available.

KAMRUI-Shop via Amazon has for Prime Members: Kamrui E3B Mini PC on sale for $329.99 - $66 with promo code PC7430MINI applied at checkout = $263.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Dr.W for sharing this deal.
  • Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons or apply promo codes. Coupons/Promo codes are typically single-use, may vary by account or may need to be re-applied in order to discount properly.
Specs:
  • AMD Ryzen 5 7430U 6 Core Processor, up to 4.3 GHz
  • AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 Integrated Graphics
  • 32GB DDR4 Memory
  • 512GB M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive
  • WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2
  • Windows 11 Home
  • Ports:
    • 2x USB3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps)
    • 4x USB3.2 Gen1 (5Gpbs)
    • 1x USB-C (10Gbps)
    • 1x HDMI 2.0
    • 1x DP1.4b
    • 1x Gigabyte Ethernet
    • 1x3.5mm Audio Jack

Editor's Notes

Written by johnny_miller | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $15.01 lower than the next best comparable online prices starting from $279.
  • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
  • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

Original Post

Written by Dr.W
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This popular offer is still available.

KAMRUI-Shop via Amazon has for Prime Members: Kamrui E3B Mini PC on sale for $329.99 - $66 with promo code PC7430MINI applied at checkout = $263.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Dr.W for sharing this deal.
  • Note: You must be logged in to clip coupons or apply promo codes. Coupons/Promo codes are typically single-use, may vary by account or may need to be re-applied in order to discount properly.
Specs:
  • AMD Ryzen 5 7430U 6 Core Processor, up to 4.3 GHz
  • AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 Integrated Graphics
  • 32GB DDR4 Memory
  • 512GB M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive
  • WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2
  • Windows 11 Home
  • Ports:
    • 2x USB3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps)
    • 4x USB3.2 Gen1 (5Gpbs)
    • 1x USB-C (10Gbps)
    • 1x HDMI 2.0
    • 1x DP1.4b
    • 1x Gigabyte Ethernet
    • 1x3.5mm Audio Jack

Editor's Notes

Written by johnny_miller | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $15.01 lower than the next best comparable online prices starting from $279.
  • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
  • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

Original Post

Written by Dr.W

Community Voting

Deal Score
+105
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Top Comments

Community Reviews

This Kamrui E3B mini PC is a compact Windows 11 Home desktop aimed at everyday use, home servers, and light media work. The Ryzen 5 7430U is described as a lower mid range chip, but the 32GB of DDR4 and 512GB SSD make it feel roomy for multitasking, Proxmox, and basic home office needs. It has handled Plex and Blue Iris well in real use, including 4K transcoding and six cameras, while drawing about 18W. The main limits are the weak Vega graphics for gaming and the gigabit ethernet and Wi Fi chip concerns on some units. A practical small box if you want modest power without much noise or bulk.

Common Questions (6)

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

103 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 13, 2025 2:32 AM
3.8K Comments
Joined Dec 2003
GandalfNYCNov 13, 2025 2:32 AM
3.8K Comments
Quote from joshuaNH View quoted comment :
I was there when the movies were on BETA.
Cheers
1
Nov 13, 2025 3:54 AM
782 Comments
Joined Nov 2011
Muddy_BottomsNov 13, 2025 3:54 AM
782 Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

So much odd/bad advice in this thread.
First, those that want to use this for plex/jellyfin. AMD is fine if your only streaming inside your home but if your going to stream outside you may need to transcode the video into a smaller file. Intel is still king in this, and it's not even close. A n100 would do a better job then this.
Second, if you are building a server you have to ask yourself how much storage your going to use. Plugging in USB drives or even a DAS into the USB port is always risky. USB carries overhead and is far more prone to data corruption vs internal storage.
Third, this is NOT a gaming machine. You may get by with old titles but keep in mind the graphics cores are Vega based. Vega is many generations behind. You will not be playing modern games on this.
3
Nov 13, 2025 5:21 AM
6.9K Comments
Joined Oct 2010
joshuaNHNov 13, 2025 5:21 AM
6.9K Comments
Quote from MuddyBottoms View quoted comment :
So much odd/bad advice in this thread.
First, those that want to use this for plex/jellyfin. AMD is fine if your only streaming inside your home but if your going to stream outside you may need to transcode the video into a smaller file. Intel is still king in this, and it's not even close. A n100 would do a better job then this.
Second, if you are building a server you have to ask yourself how much storage your going to use. Plugging in USB drives or even a DAS into the USB port is always risky. USB carries overhead and is far more prone to data corruption vs internal storage.
Third, this is NOT a gaming machine. You may get by with old titles but keep in mind the graphics cores are Vega based. Vega is many generations behind. You will not be playing modern games on this.
Why Intel (even an N100) Can Win Here

Intel CPUs, even very low-power ones like the N100, have:

Quick Sync, a dedicated hardware block for video encoding/decoding (H.264, HEVC, VP9, AV1 depending on generation).

Plex and Jellyfin have direct hardware support for Intel's Quick Sync.

This means an N100 can handle multiple simultaneous 1080p transcodes while barely using any CPU.

BUT BUT BUT...
AMD's VCN 4.0 (Video Codec Next 4.0) hardware can work with Plex for hardware-accelerated transcoding, but it requires a Plex Pass and generally works better on Windows than Linux due to varying levels of official support and driver implementations. If VCN 4.0 does work with Plex, intel and amd would be almost equal but thre real thing is plex truely supports quick sync so intel is the way to go without a doubt and it is dirt cheap.


AMD CPUs (like the Ryzen 7 7845HS / 8745HS) use Radeon integrated graphics (RDNA3), which have their own media engine — but Plex/Jellyfin hardware acceleration on AMD is:

Less mature

Less efficient

Less widely supported

Sometimes requires extra configuration or driver workarounds in Linux or Docker setups.

So while the AMD CPU itself is way more powerful, Plex may fall back to software transcoding, which uses the CPU cores instead of the GPU.
That burns power and limits the number of simultaneous streams.
Last edited by joshuaNH November 12, 2025 at 09:32 PM.
2
Nov 13, 2025 1:56 PM
33 Comments
Joined May 2007
KilgraveNov 13, 2025 1:56 PM
33 Comments
Would this computer handle streaming a small church service to youtube? Single video input and audio from the camera..

Thanks.
Nov 13, 2025 4:10 PM
59 Comments
Joined Feb 2012
txwNov 13, 2025 4:10 PM
59 Comments
Quote from jottect View quoted comment :
It is not a clear winner 16GB DDR5 vs 32GB DDR4, it depends a lot on what you are trying to accomplish!If you're primarily focused on gaming and plan to play a wide variety of modern titles, especially open-world or simulation games, 32GB of DDR4 is generally the better option. The extra capacity will provide a more stable and enjoyable gaming experience, preventing stutters and allowing you to run other applications in the background.If you're on a tight budget and are only playing less demanding games, 16GB of DDR5 might be sufficient. However, you'll likely encounter limitations in more resource-intensive titles.
Well, with a Vega 7 iGPU, I don't think you'll be playing any modern titles. Maybe Retro Arcade stuff which isn't very memory intensive.
1
Pro
Nov 13, 2025 6:44 PM
4.6K Comments
Joined Jul 2003
edrock200
Pro
Nov 13, 2025 6:44 PM
4.6K Comments
Quote from blautens View quoted comment :
I purchased this exact model for $268 back in July. I bought it to play around with mini PCS instead of all the enterprise equipment and servers in my home lab. I ended up using it as a Plex server. It's working quite nicely even though it doesn't have Intel quicksync. It seems to do hardware transcoding without an issue - 4k video transcoded without putting much of a dent in the processor at all.
If you installed plex on windows, I suspect it's using the intgrated vega gpu for transcoding. Even a modern CPU will have heavy utilization doing 4k transcode using CPU only.
Pro
Deal Editor
Nov 14, 2025 8:57 AM
27.9K Comments
Joined May 2014
johnny_millerNov 14, 2025 8:57 AM
Pro
Deal Editor
27.9K Comments
Deal/code is still valid.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 14, 2025 11:55 AM
5 Comments
Joined Nov 2018
YoucefLNov 14, 2025 11:55 AM
5 Comments
Can you use it to mine crypto though?
1
Nov 14, 2025 1:14 PM
125 Comments
Joined Jul 2008
crifeverNov 14, 2025 1:14 PM
125 Comments
I am considering this to run proxmox with various lightweight VM runnings. One of which would be running Frigate NVM. Wondering if this hardware would be good enough for running this?
Nov 14, 2025 1:37 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Jun 2006
zyberwoofNov 14, 2025 1:37 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from OrangeJulius View quoted comment :
The 32GB RAM will never be used by average users, but it's nice to have.
I'll disagree. I think the average user will be able to take advantage of 32 GB. A better way to put it would be that average users would probably see a benefit from more than 16 GB. The issue is that 20-30GB of RAM doesn't often happen outside of virtualization and some 24 GB DDR5 systems.

On a technical level, your OS will use a lot more RAM than is needed for caching. Caching can greatly speed up the overall snappiness of your system. 64 GB is overkill. But only 16 GiB very easily gets you into a spot where the OS is hitting the swap file in a way that negatively impacts performance.

Another technical note would be to consider the RAM usage of the iGPU. Since there is no dGPU, the OS can be pretty generous about giving system RAM for video memory. Even a modest 2 GB given away for video memory is a sizable chunk of 16 GB.

Lastly, do none of you keep a bunch of browser tabs open? Chrome, Firefox, and Edge all seem to love to hold onto RAM. And browsers are notorious for having various memory leaks found and patched over time. I do feel like I'm not the only one who sees a massive amount of memory regularly used by web browsers.
  • 8 GB works, but sounds miserable.
  • 16 GB is enough for the typical user. But, I think that most users who multitask would feel noticeable system improvements with more RAM than this.
  • 24 GB is probably the sweet spot.
  • 32 GB overkill. But since the options are normally 16 or 32 GB, this is the better choice, IMO. Especially if you can go back in time a few months to when RAM was much more reasonably priced.

IMO, 24 GB of RAM is probably the current sweet spot for a typical, non-browser tab hoarding user to feel like their Windows system is running great. Alternatively, 16 GB plus a dGPU with its own dedicated vRAM.

Just my $.02
1
1
Nov 14, 2025 1:46 PM
51 Comments
Joined Sep 2016
VubNov 14, 2025 1:46 PM
51 Comments
Has anyone ever used one of these on like an Asus ROG ally x?
1
Nov 14, 2025 1:50 PM
4.6K Comments
Joined Aug 2007
pug_sterNov 14, 2025 1:50 PM
4.6K Comments
I rather buy a mini pc with more cores, considering that they use notebook soc's.
Nov 14, 2025 2:05 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Jun 2006
zyberwoofNov 14, 2025 2:05 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from crifever View quoted comment :
I am considering this to run proxmox with various lightweight VM runnings. One of which would be running Frigate NVM. Wondering if this hardware would be good enough for running this?
Windows uses (wastes?) a lot of resources. Linux server OSs tend to use very little by themselves, aside from a few GB of storage overhead for the OS. So you need to start by indicating if you'll be running one or multiple Windows VMs.

Next get an idea for what services you'll be running. That's where your RAM and processing normally go. I haven't used Frigate, but I have to assume that anything doing A/V creation or processing can use a lot of resources. A lot of things like Pihole or Home Assistant, don't use much. Try to identify what services use a lot of resources and which ones don't.

While you're still thinking about your services, think about home many of them are in use at at time. By "in use" I mean doing more than just sitting there. And think about how many of them are active concurrently. Here's some examples:
  • Pihole is always active, but it uses very little resources, so it is very negligable.
  • A Wireguard server uses a moderate amount of resources. But only when devices are connected and using it. So it may sit idle for you most of the time.
  • Plex uses a ton of CPU, or a moderate amount of GPU if you have one that's supported. But it's only doing this when you are actively watching a video.
  • Frigate looks to be the kind of thing running 24/7. If it is, you can think of it as a consistent % of your resources used up.
People can load up dozens of services on an 8 GB Raspberry Pi, since most things don't use a lot of resources. And most services aren't used concurrently,and sit idle most of the time. This system can easily be a Proxmox host that can handle a lot. But without knowing what all you want to use it for, it could also be easily be crushed by a single heavy service like Ollama or a highly modded game server.

Last note: iGPUs don't get passed easily to VMs. If you were hoping to offload workloads to your GPU, a system like this isn't ideal. I believe you could more smoothly utilize the iGPU with a container in Proxmox. But for a VM, it's much easier and more practical to use a physical host with a 2nd dGPU that you can dedicate to a VM.
Nov 14, 2025 2:28 PM
1.9K Comments
Joined Aug 2007
OrangeJuliusNov 14, 2025 2:28 PM
1.9K Comments
Quote from zyberwoof View quoted comment :
I'll disagree. I think the average user will be able to take advantage of 32 GB. A better way to put it would be that average users would probably see a benefit from more than 16 GB. The issue is that 20-30GB of RAM doesn't often happen outside of virtualization and some 24 GB DDR5 systems.

On a technical level, your OS will use a lot more RAM than is needed for caching. Caching can greatly speed up the overall snappiness of your system. 64 GB is overkill. But only 16 GiB very easily gets you into a spot where the OS is hitting the swap file in a way that negatively impacts performance.

Another technical note would be to consider the RAM usage of the iGPU. Since there is no dGPU, the OS can be pretty generous about giving system RAM for video memory. Even a modest 2 GB given away for video memory is a sizable chunk of 16 GB.

Lastly, do none of you keep a bunch of browser tabs open? Chrome, Firefox, and Edge all seem to love to hold onto RAM. And browsers are notorious for having various memory leaks found and patched over time. I do feel like I'm not the only one who sees a massive amount of memory regularly used by web browsers.
  • 8 GB works, but sounds miserable.
  • 16 GB is enough for the typical user. But, I think that most users who multitask would feel noticeable system improvements with more RAM than this.
  • 24 GB is probably the sweet spot.
  • 32 GB overkill. But since the options are normally 16 or 32 GB, this is the better choice, IMO. Especially if you can go back in time a few months to when RAM was much more reasonably priced.
IMO, 24 GB of RAM is probably the current sweet spot for a typical, non-browser tab hoarding user to feel like their Windows system is running great. Alternatively, 16 GB plus a dGPU with its own dedicated vRAM.

Just my $.02
A little anecdote, from a systems admin at a MSP who manages thousands of PCs for different organizations. (Me)

We have a lot of client PCs running 8GB, 16GB, and 32GB of RAM. Very few non-servers with 48GB or more RAM. Real utilization of that RAM is easy to ascertain, because we monitor all this equipment with Labtech's Automate minute by minute. We manage the fleets with SentinelOne (S1) Endpoint, (Eset as the cheaper alternative) Duo Desktop, NinjaRMM, ScreenConnect, and a few other smaller apps. That's a serious load on those PCs, taking up anywhere from 1.5-4GB RAM with those apps alone, depending on the organization's security needs.

Do you know what we have found? 8GB is adequate for deployments without Threatlocker and S1, but with it, 16GB is needed. Under no circumstances have clients actually needed more than 16GB, unless it's a workstation designed to run heavyweight applications like Solidworks or Premier Pro. Seriously, even with bloated security software, 16GB has never been a problem for the Chrome/Edge+365 apps crowd that makes up the 98%. 8GB, on the other hand, is not enough for new machines, so we will not sell a PC to customers with less than 16GB. 8GB becomes an acute problem when the user is frequently docked and uses a ton of Chrome / Edge tabs across multiple windows while also running a few 365 apps and Adobe Acrobat Pro. This can be exacerbated by AMD laptop's frequently defaulting to 1-2GB RAM reserved for the iGPU.

No home consumer is going to run the suite of security applications we run on those business machines, so tell me, what will John Q Public be doing on their laptop that requires more than 16GB RAM? Most aren't doing heavy video editing.

Keep in mind, if you have 32GB RAM, Windows will find ways to use it, as it loves to stage memory for background applications. This mainly assist with switching between multiple Windows if you never close applications, and just leave them all open. Don't do that, and make sure you shut down your Windows PC at least once a week, or you will inevitably experience system instability. Trust me, we have seen all manner of poor usage with machines. I remember encountering an extremely unstable desktop someone hadn't rebooted in over 6 months, instead putting it to sleep, never letting it complete WinUpdates. Curse Vista with it's idiotic replacement of the power button function with sleep. Never again.

Gaming and heavyweight applications like those previously mentioned are a few scenarios that pushes my recommended level to 32GB. For that scenario, I will agree. I think you are probably a power user who uses more memory than 95% of users, and you're assuming everyone has the same habits and needs. Not everyone leaves 10+ browser tabs open, all the time.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 14, 2025 2:36 PM
1.9K Comments
Joined Aug 2007
OrangeJuliusNov 14, 2025 2:36 PM
1.9K Comments
Quote from Vub View quoted comment :
Has anyone ever used one of these on like an Asus ROG ally x?
What does that even mean? This isn't a docked GPU you plug an ROG Ally into. If you are comparing it to the Ally, even a Steam Deck will beat this in games. This mini is running an old Vega 7 iGPU, so it's outdated and incapable of playing games well, outside of older or basic titles.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!