This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Even though the new 22TB Seagate externals use Barracuda CMR drives with HAMR technology, they're still built as desktop-class drives, not NAS or enterprise units. Their workload rating, vibration tolerance, and firmware are tuned for light, single-drive usage — not RAID arrays, multi-bay vibration, or nonstop 24/7 workloads.
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Even though the new 22TB Seagate externals use Barracuda CMR drives with HAMR technology, they're still built as desktop-class drives, not NAS or enterprise units. Their workload rating, vibration tolerance, and firmware are tuned for light, single-drive usage — not RAID arrays, multi-bay vibration, or nonstop 24/7 workloads.
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
Even though the new 22TB Seagate externals use Barracuda CMR drives with HAMR technology, they're still built as desktop-class drives, not NAS or enterprise units. Their workload rating, vibration tolerance, and firmware are tuned for light, single-drive usage — not RAID arrays, multi-bay vibration, or nonstop 24/7 workloads.
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
Any resources to corroborate this claim?
I agree it's a desktop class drive and is not rated for NAS use of 24/7. That said, it would be good to substantiate if there's been testing, or indicated as such by the specs or otherwise.
Any resources to corroborate this claim?I agree it's a desktop class drive and is not rated for NAS use of 24/7. That said, it would be good to substantiate if there's been testing, or indicated as such by the specs or otherwise.
Most of data and expert opinion I could find say these are just binned EXOs and the workload rating / warranty difference is purely for product segmentation.
All drives from all manufacturers eventually fail. Ive some 3TB WD drives for over 12 years ago that have been running in my Unraid server 24/7 and are just fine. Yes I've also has a couple of those same drives fail over the same timespan, but theyre all "desktop" rated drives.
If you need the space, this is a great deal and statistically the drive will serve you well regardless of how you use it.
You can use the PayPal buy now pay later deal(BNPL) that's going on for 20% off. It's sold by newegg but can purchase it directly through Best Buy. For those that qualify you'll see an option for that PayPal option during checkout and scroll to the bottom for BNPL.
You can use the PayPal buy now pay later deal(BNPL) that's going on for 20% off. It's sold by newegg but can purchase it directly through Best Buy. For those that qualify you'll see an option for that PayPal option during checkout and scroll to the bottom for BNPL.
When I checkout with Best Buy and use Paypal, I don't see the 20% CB BNPL option. On Newegg, I do see a $40 offer, but it's for a credit card it seems, not the BNPL.
When I checkout with Best Buy and use Paypal, I don't see the 20% CB BNPL option. On Newegg, I do see a $40 offer, but it's for a credit card it seems, not the BNPL.
Tnx. Just BNPL with PayPal. When will we get the 20% cash back? After completing the last payment?Is there way to confirm we actually correctly activated this?
good-looking out. I needed the storage, and 26TB will help me clear out 3 x 8TB drives I have that are fool. This new 26TB drive is my "Black Friday" purchase. I'm going to move all the movies over from those 3 drives and this is going to be cold storage, but also, the occasional movie will be streamed from this drive a few times a week, or maybe even daily. It will never see high usage. I really hope the 20% PayPal reward thing worked for me. That's like $50+ dollars. Thanks again.
Not only better value per TB, but its always a better value to have the largest size possible even if the price per TB is a little higher, as it will be useful to you much longer and use less power and space.
Even though the new 22TB Seagate externals use Barracuda CMR drives with HAMR technology, they're still built as desktop-class drives, not NAS or enterprise units. Their workload rating, vibration tolerance, and firmware are tuned for light, single-drive usage — not RAID arrays, multi-bay vibration, or nonstop 24/7 workloads. The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward. Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label: "For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out." Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives. Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
Is there any advantage of getting a second one of these and setting it up in parallel as raid1 in a windows PC?
Im backing up to the cloud daily, but would love to have a local solution if the drive fails.
On the surface of it, two drives seems better than one. But if you are telling me there's a good chance drive #2 dies before I can replace drive #1...
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
The 22TB HAMR Barracuda is basically a desktop drive that won the genetic lottery for capacity but failed every fitness test afterward.
Yeah, it's CMR and HAMR — cool — but the workload rating is so pathetic it might as well come with a warning label:
"For light use only. Like… VERY light. Please don't stress me out."
Put this thing in a NAS and the moment a RAID rebuild starts, it'll be in the corner having a panic attack, filing HR complaints against your other drives.
Despite the cutting-edge HAMR recording tech, the drive's workload rating and reliability specs fall far behind what a NAS environment demands, making it a poor fit for anything beyond occasional archival or general storage.
I agree it's a desktop class drive and is not rated for NAS use of 24/7. That said, it would be good to substantiate if there's been testing, or indicated as such by the specs or otherwise.
All drives from all manufacturers eventually fail. Ive some 3TB WD drives for over 12 years ago that have been running in my Unraid server 24/7 and are just fine. Yes I've also has a couple of those same drives fail over the same timespan, but theyre all "desktop" rated drives.
If you need the space, this is a great deal and statistically the drive will serve you well regardless of how you use it.
Edit: For those wondering, I found the deal. You have to go to the rewards section on Paypal and "save" the offer first. It's here: https://slickdeals.net/f/18824500-select-paypal-accounts-pay-later-with-paypal-get-20-cash-back?v=1
It's best to combine purchases to increase CB.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Edit: For those wondering, I found the deal. You have to go to the rewards section on Paypal and "save" the offer first. It's here: https://slickdeals.net/f/18824500-select-paypal-accounts-pay-later-with-paypal-get-20-cash-back?v=1
It's best to combine purchases to increase CB.
https://www.bhphotovide
That said, there's also this option: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DW92YSB6 at $10.35/TB and a whopping 28TB.
Im backing up to the cloud daily, but would love to have a local solution if the drive fails.
On the surface of it, two drives seems better than one. But if you are telling me there's a good chance drive #2 dies before I can replace drive #1...
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I know this isn't a "purple" drive, but is this a good idea to buy it, shuck it, and use it for home camera system?
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!