B&H Photo Video has
Crucial 4TB BX500 SATA III 2.5" Internal SSD (CT4000BX500SSD1) for $351.99 - $167 off (coupon auto applies in cart) =
$184.99.
Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member
N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
- 4TB Storage Capacity
- 2.5" / 7mm Form Factor
- SATA III 6 Gb/s Interface
- Up to 540 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
- Up to 500 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
- 1.5 Million Hours MTTF
- Micron 3D NAND Technology
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This Crucial BX500 4TB is a budget SATA SSD best suited for secondary storage or SATA only systems, especially where NVMe is not an option. The low price drew interest, and the drive should still beat a spinning hard drive in light use or console and NAS setups with modest demands. The main concern is performance, since it is DRAMless and repeatedly described as slow, with weak sustained writes and poor results in heavier uses like Windows installs or RAID5. Availability also looked shaky, with stock issues and price changes appearing during checkout, making it a practical but limited pick.
systems that don't have NVMe (SATA-only setups) because commenters said it's a good deal for systems that don't have M.2/NVMe options.
light-use setups where you mostly consume content and rarely move large files because one commenter said DRAM-less behavior is more likely to be a non-issue on SATA if you're not doing heavy transfers.
people building a NAS with only a couple of 2.5" SATA slots available for storage expansion because a commenter said they could make use of 2.5" SATA even if write times are worse, as long as read performance is decent.
buyers who want a DRAM-equipped SATA SSD like the MX500 because multiple commenters said they wouldn't buy this DRAM-less BX500 and that the MX500 is much better.
buyers who expect consistently fast performance under sustained load because commenters said this specific model "gets slow" and "chokes when sustained."
people who want a SATA SSD that's reliably "practical" today because commenters called the BX500 outright horrible / not a deal at any price and recommended paying for the Samsung 870 EVO instead.
people planning to install Windows on it because commenters warned that the lack of DRAM may really slow it down, especially during Windows installation.
anyone using this in a RAID5 NAS array because one commenter said write operations "fall off a cliff" (amplified by RAID5 parity updates) and they had to get rid of the drives.
Common Questions (5)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
58 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The price of sata went below nvme for a while, but models and factories closed/switched/discontinued so now there is no price advantage.
This is incorrect on several points. The interface doesn't matter, these drives use NAND just like NVMe SSDs. The only difference is they might use older types and/or lower binned NAND, but it's still essentially the same thing.
While AI data centers are gobbling up DRAM, they're also sucking up most of the NAND and hard drive production. That's why the price of drives is increasing. These days, few SSDs still have DRAM. It's mostly limited to the highest end models. Also, it is relevant to SATA drives, as they don't support HMB like NVMe drives. The areas that DRAM provides the most benefit (small, random I/O) aren't limited by the bus.
I'll still argue that unless you're knowledgeable and you know exactly what you're getting for this drive, most people should be going for an nvme drive rather than a SATA III given the more modern interface of nvme.
4TB $329, not great but not awful if you need it.
https://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-In...L36GF?th=1
I had both of my Inland drives (never again) have their DRAM modules go (I think); passed Crystal disk mark a hundred times and spent over a year chasing down ghosts on my rig before I started tracking actual real world throughput on the drives. Realized they were actually operating at about 20-30mbps on network transfers after a quick burst. (and yeah, my random IO was still scoring the same as the day I got the drive, but I still think it was something funky with the DRAM module)
Obviously I'm not an expert given the misinfo on SATA; last time there was a slickdeal on a drive like this there was a lot of SDers who didn't really get the fact that you should only buy SATA these days if you have a very specific use scenario that generally means you're an I.T. nerd.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
4 TB MX500 seems to be out of stock on Amazon
B&H doesn't know what an MX500 is.
Walmart only knows of a 1 TB variety and a bike.
Ebay has three listed: Used for $200, new for $370, or parts only for $280.
The last slickdeal for the MX500 was in 2024 unless you're talking the fat tire bike.
So as far as I can tell, the MX500 costs more than an 870 Evo, at least right now. But the MX500 is the one being recommended right now.
I'm setting up a NAS that is primarily NVME with a couple of 9mm tall 2.5" SATA 3 slots available. I could make good use of those even with bad write times as long as the read performance is decent. Any other suggestions would be great, but no rush. I'm happy to wait many months, I just thought this was the right time of year to look!
Thanks
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!