expired
Crucial 4TB BX500 SATA III 2.5" Internal SSD
$185
$352
47% off
+ Free Shippingat B&H Photo Video
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
+ Free Shippingat B&H Photo VideoDeal Details
B&H Photo Video has Crucial 4TB BX500 SATA III 2.5" Internal SSD (CT4000BX500SSD1) for $351.99 - $167 off (coupon auto applies in cart) = $184.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
Thanks to Community Member N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
- 4TB Storage Capacity
- 2.5" / 7mm Form Factor
- SATA III 6 Gb/s Interface
- Up to 540 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
- Up to 500 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
- 1.5 Million Hours MTTF
- Micron 3D NAND Technology
Editor's Notes
Written by Neo45 | Staff- Our research indicates that this deal is 10$ less than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $194.99 at the time of this posting.
- Please see the original post for additional details & give the WIKI and additional forum comments a read for helpful discussion.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
B&H Photo Video has Crucial 4TB BX500 SATA III 2.5" Internal SSD (CT4000BX500SSD1) for $351.99 - $167 off (coupon auto applies in cart) = $184.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
Thanks to Community Member N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
- 4TB Storage Capacity
- 2.5" / 7mm Form Factor
- SATA III 6 Gb/s Interface
- Up to 540 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
- Up to 500 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
- 1.5 Million Hours MTTF
- Micron 3D NAND Technology
Editor's Notes
Written by Neo45 | Staff- Our research indicates that this deal is 10$ less than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $194.99 at the time of this posting.
- Please see the original post for additional details & give the WIKI and additional forum comments a read for helpful discussion.
Community Voting
Deal
Score
+49
Good Deal
Bad Deal
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This Crucial BX500 4TB is a budget SATA SSD best suited for secondary storage or SATA only systems, especially where NVMe is not an option. The low price drew interest, and the drive should still beat a spinning hard drive in light use or console and NAS setups with modest demands. The main concern is performance, since it is DRAMless and repeatedly described as slow, with weak sustained writes and poor results in heavier uses like Windows installs or RAID5. Availability also looked shaky, with stock issues and price changes appearing during checkout, making it a practical but limited pick.
systems that don't have NVMe (SATA-only setups) because commenters said it's a good deal for systems that don't have M.2/NVMe options.
light-use setups where you mostly consume content and rarely move large files because one commenter said DRAM-less behavior is more likely to be a non-issue on SATA if you're not doing heavy transfers.
people building a NAS with only a couple of 2.5" SATA slots available for storage expansion because a commenter said they could make use of 2.5" SATA even if write times are worse, as long as read performance is decent.
buyers who want a DRAM-equipped SATA SSD like the MX500 because multiple commenters said they wouldn't buy this DRAM-less BX500 and that the MX500 is much better.
buyers who expect consistently fast performance under sustained load because commenters said this specific model "gets slow" and "chokes when sustained."
people who want a SATA SSD that's reliably "practical" today because commenters called the BX500 outright horrible / not a deal at any price and recommended paying for the Samsung 870 EVO instead.
people planning to install Windows on it because commenters warned that the lack of DRAM may really slow it down, especially during Windows installation.
anyone using this in a RAID5 NAS array because one commenter said write operations "fall off a cliff" (amplified by RAID5 parity updates) and they had to get rid of the drives.
Common Questions (5)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
58 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
4 TB MX500 seems to be out of stock on Amazon
B&H doesn't know what an MX500 is.
Walmart only knows of a 1 TB variety and a bike.
Ebay has three listed: Used for $200, new for $370, or parts only for $280.
The last slickdeal for the MX500 was in 2024 unless you're talking the fat tire bike.
So as far as I can tell, the MX500 costs more than an 870 Evo, at least right now. But the MX500 is the one being recommended right now.
I'm setting up a NAS that is primarily NVME with a couple of 9mm tall 2.5" SATA 3 slots available. I could make good use of those even with bad write times as long as the read performance is decent. Any other suggestions would be great, but no rush. I'm happy to wait many months, I just thought this was the right time of year to look!
Thanks
4 TB MX500 seems to be out of stock on Amazon
B&H doesn't know what an MX500 is.
Walmart only knows of a 1 TB variety and a bike.
Ebay has three listed: Used for $200, new for $370, or parts only for $280.
The last slickdeal for the MX500 was in 2024 unless you're talking the fat tire bike.
So as far as I can tell, the MX500 costs more than an 870 Evo, at least right now. But the MX500 is the one being recommended right now.
I'm setting up a NAS that is primarily NVME with a couple of 9mm tall 2.5" SATA 3 slots available. I could make good use of those even with bad write times as long as the read performance is decent. Any other suggestions would be great, but no rush. I'm happy to wait many months, I just thought this was the right time of year to look!
Thanks
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I think the vast majority of people can get away with a DRAMless NVMe SSD because of HMB technology. It performs close enough that most people won't notice ever. It's a bit different with SATA since it doesn't have HMB and relies on SLC cache. Though if the user just consumes content and rarely ever handles large files, it's a non-issue.
I have a Raspberry Pi 5 I use as my efficiency computer just for browsing the web. It runs on a generic cheap midcroSD card, which is way slower than a SATA ssd and I never felt the need to get anything better for this setup.
I think the vast majority of people can get away with a DRAMless NVMe SSD because of HMB technology. It performs close enough that most people won't notice ever. It's a bit different with SATA since it doesn't have HMB and relies on SLC cache. Though if the user just consumes content and rarely ever handles large files, it's a non-issue.
I have a Raspberry Pi 5 I use as my efficiency computer just for browsing the web. It runs on a generic cheap midcroSD card, which is way slower than a SATA ssd and I never felt the need to get anything better for this setup.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!