B&H Photo Video has
Crucial 4TB BX500 SATA III 2.5" Internal SSD (CT4000BX500SSD1) for $351.99 - $167 off (coupon auto applies in cart) =
$184.99.
Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member
N3RD_01 for sharing this deal.
Key Features:
- 4TB Storage Capacity
- 2.5" / 7mm Form Factor
- SATA III 6 Gb/s Interface
- Up to 540 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
- Up to 500 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
- 1.5 Million Hours MTTF
- Micron 3D NAND Technology
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This Crucial BX500 4TB is a budget SATA SSD best suited for secondary storage or SATA only systems, especially where NVMe is not an option. The low price drew interest, and the drive should still beat a spinning hard drive in light use or console and NAS setups with modest demands. The main concern is performance, since it is DRAMless and repeatedly described as slow, with weak sustained writes and poor results in heavier uses like Windows installs or RAID5. Availability also looked shaky, with stock issues and price changes appearing during checkout, making it a practical but limited pick.
Common Questions (5)
The BX500 is a DRAM-less SATA SSD and is repeatedly described as much slower than the MX500, especially under sustained or write-heavy use. The MX500 is also noted as discontinued, while the Samsung 870 EVO is the remaining higher-end SATA option if you need SATA and can pay more.
It can work for light secondary storage, but it is a poor fit for Windows installs and RAID5 NAS use because the drive can slow down sharply when sustained writes hit. In a RAID5 array, write operations reportedly fall off a cliff, and the lack of DRAM is called out as a major reason.
This BX500 model is described as DRAM-less, which is why it is expected to slow down more than drives like the MX500. Some comments also note that SATA does not support HMB, so DRAM can still matter for small random I/O and sustained performance.
Yes, it can make sense for SATA-only systems or secondary storage when NVMe is not available. The main practical use case mentioned is adding large SATA storage where you do not need top-tier performance.
It was reported as out of stock during checkout, and later as temporarily out of stock with the price showing $351.99 instead of the deal price. That suggests the coupon or sale may no longer be active.
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
58 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
4 TB MX500 seems to be out of stock on Amazon
B&H doesn't know what an MX500 is.
Walmart only knows of a 1 TB variety and a bike.
Ebay has three listed: Used for $200, new for $370, or parts only for $280.
The last slickdeal for the MX500 was in 2024 unless you're talking the fat tire bike.
So as far as I can tell, the MX500 costs more than an 870 Evo, at least right now. But the MX500 is the one being recommended right now.
I'm setting up a NAS that is primarily NVME with a couple of 9mm tall 2.5" SATA 3 slots available. I could make good use of those even with bad write times as long as the read performance is decent. Any other suggestions would be great, but no rush. I'm happy to wait many months, I just thought this was the right time of year to look!
Thanks
4 TB MX500 seems to be out of stock on Amazon
B&H doesn't know what an MX500 is.
Walmart only knows of a 1 TB variety and a bike.
Ebay has three listed: Used for $200, new for $370, or parts only for $280.
The last slickdeal for the MX500 was in 2024 unless you're talking the fat tire bike.
So as far as I can tell, the MX500 costs more than an 870 Evo, at least right now. But the MX500 is the one being recommended right now.
I'm setting up a NAS that is primarily NVME with a couple of 9mm tall 2.5" SATA 3 slots available. I could make good use of those even with bad write times as long as the read performance is decent. Any other suggestions would be great, but no rush. I'm happy to wait many months, I just thought this was the right time of year to look!
Thanks
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I think the vast majority of people can get away with a DRAMless NVMe SSD because of HMB technology. It performs close enough that most people won't notice ever. It's a bit different with SATA since it doesn't have HMB and relies on SLC cache. Though if the user just consumes content and rarely ever handles large files, it's a non-issue.
I have a Raspberry Pi 5 I use as my efficiency computer just for browsing the web. It runs on a generic cheap midcroSD card, which is way slower than a SATA ssd and I never felt the need to get anything better for this setup.
I think the vast majority of people can get away with a DRAMless NVMe SSD because of HMB technology. It performs close enough that most people won't notice ever. It's a bit different with SATA since it doesn't have HMB and relies on SLC cache. Though if the user just consumes content and rarely ever handles large files, it's a non-issue.
I have a Raspberry Pi 5 I use as my efficiency computer just for browsing the web. It runs on a generic cheap midcroSD card, which is way slower than a SATA ssd and I never felt the need to get anything better for this setup.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!