popularphoinix | Staff posted Yesterday 08:33 AM
Item 1 of 3
Item 1 of 3
popularphoinix | Staff posted Yesterday 08:33 AM
$179.99* | Lenovo Idea Tab w/ Pen + Folio Case: 11″ 2.5K IPS Touch, MediaTek 6300, 8GB, 256GB at Amazon
$180
$250
28% offAmazon
Get Deal at AmazonGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
15 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank GeoffreyK24
I really like a lot of their products and have several Chromebooks by Lenovo but companies who are licensed to use Android are basically in charge of how they push their security patches and system updates and Lenovo has proven for years that they aren't willing to respect their customers enough to follow up with appropriate support in this way. Until they can prove over a good length of time that they have changed the way they handle their android products, I won't let myself buy them. I'm not judging anyone that does. I'm just sharing why I decided to stop.
I really like a lot of their products and have several Chromebooks by Lenovo but companies who are licensed to use Android are basically in charge of how they push their security patches and system updates and Lenovo has proven for years that they aren't willing to respect their customers enough to follow up with appropriate support in this way. Until they can prove over a good length of time that they have changed the way they handle their android products, I won't let myself buy them. I'm not judging anyone that does. I'm just sharing why I decided to stop.
I really like a lot of their products and have several Chromebooks by Lenovo but companies who are licensed to use Android are basically in charge of how they push their security patches and system updates and Lenovo has proven for years that they aren't willing to respect their customers enough to follow up with appropriate support in this way. Until they can prove over a good length of time that they have changed the way they handle their android products, I won't let myself buy them. I'm not judging anyone that does. I'm just sharing why I decided to stop.
Lenovo's Advantage: Lenovo uses a version of Android that is much closer to "Stock" (Google's original version). Because they have fewer custom features, they have fewer proprietary bugs to fix.
From looking back in the last year... it is Samsung that has screwed up over and over and over and over again.... That is, this Lenovo tablet was safer to have then any Samsung Tablet due to multiple vulnerabilities... and ones that are still going on.
AND this is Lenovo's lowest level tablet... they put more time and effort on their higher end tablets.. like every other manufacturer.
Look, if you are worried... get yourself a Pixel, GOogle just added two years of more security downloads.
I believe the closer to google's OS the better or at least the less chance of getting hacked.
Right now... the only device that gets ALL the updates is a GOOGLE DEVICE. I personally can not trust or rely on any manufacture with IMHO... Samsung being the worst of the bunch.
I think this is a great starter tablet.
Google provides all companies who license Android with complete reports of vulnerabilities and version updates for them to handle. They provide a UI that allows for extreme variation in hardware and skins which is why there are such vast differences in brands and models. That amount of variability means EVERYONE is benefiting because it creates competition within the ecosystem as different brands/models push out newer capabilities. Even Apple benefits from this as Apple and Android have both progressed off of the other's advances. When a company develops a phone that folds or has crazy camera hardware that pushes the limits of what was thought possible for a phone, the company who manufactured that specific device has to be the one to implement any updates because they have a level of customization that requires special attention to cater to their UI and hardware. That also means that they can choose to be like Lenovo has been and put out great products that have little support on the back end. It is up to the consumer to buy products from companies that will maintain devices their customers have chosen to invest in. Sometimes, people simply don't know this exists and it might take one post on Slickdeals for them to be made aware so they can decide for themselves whether or not they will buy a product like this or not.
Google maintains the ability to control updates for Chrome which is why those devices are constantly getting updates right away.
I won't claim to be an industry insider and up to date on every android tablet development from every major player but the issues with Lenovo are ones that have plagued their android products for years. As for telling me, "look, if you are worried... get yourself....", thank you for your permission to buy what I'm comfortable with lol. I'm not sure that was ever a factor in question here but I'm glad we are on the same page.
I don't agree that variability of models and brand innovation is a "huge" problem with Android as much as a natural development of an OS that is made this way. It is up to the consumer to educate themselves and stay aware of what the brands are doing to support that customer's investment in their technology just like any other major product out there. If you have a choice to buy a car from a company known to have vulnerabilities and safety issues just because they are less expensive, that is your right. The answer will never be to make every vehicle nearly identical. That's not how companies operate and it isn't how innovation flourishes. Idealism is not always realistic. However, the vanilla Android OS is always under the hood just like their are manufacturing laws associated with safety requirements to make a vehicle street legal.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I don't agree that variability of models and brand innovation is a "huge" problem with Android as much as a natural development of an OS that is made this way. It is up to the consumer to educate themselves and stay aware of what the brands are doing to support that customer's investment in their technology just like any other major product out there. If you have a choice to buy a car from a company known to have vulnerabilities and safety issues just because they are less expensive, that is your right. The answer will never be to make every vehicle nearly identical. That's not how companies operate and it isn't how innovation flourishes. Idealism is not always realistic. However, the vanilla Android OS is always under the hood just like their are manufacturing laws associated with safety requirements to make a vehicle street legal.
Right now, users are reporting that their tablets are still stuck on the July or September 2025 versions because Samsung has blocked google play system services from updating which has created many security risks for only Samsung users... that is, that piece of shit Chinese tablet is not as vulnerable as that Samsung because Samsung has blocked google's app updates, so I tested this out, and I opened my Redmagic Astra Gaming Tablet and guess what, I was at January 2026 (the app just updates by itself, keeps me safe at night).
Look here is a AI anology of a Samsung Tablet and an Alldocube Iplay 60 Mini Turbo...
The Samsung Galaxy: The Compromised Mega-Bank
Imagine a bank so massive it has 500 tellers. Samsung (especially on their budget/mid-range tablets) doesn't just hire their own tellers; they rent out desks to third parties.
The Problem: One desk is rented to Microsoft (Office/OneDrive), another to Meta (Facebook), another to a weather app company, and another to a "utility" app like AppCloud or Glance.
The Security Risk: Even if Samsung's main vault is high-tech, each one of those 500 tellers has their own key to a side door. If the "Weather App" teller leaves their door unlocked, a hacker doesn't need to crack Samsung's vault—they just walk in through the weather app.
The "Attack Surface": Because there are so many third-party apps touching the UI, there are 500 potential points of failure. Even with monthly security patches, you are constantly playing "Whack-A-Mole" trying to close all those doors.
The Alldocube iPlay 60 Mini Turbo: The Locked Barn
Now, look at the Alldocube iPlay 60 Mini Turbo. It's like a simple, sturdy stone barn with one heavy door.
The Setup: There are no third-party tellers. There's no Microsoft desk, no Facebook desk, and no "Recommended Apps" salesperson standing in the lobby. It's just "Stock Android"—the bare essentials.
The Security Paradox: Even though the "Barn" might only get a security update once every six months (or never), there is only one door to guard. Because the OS is so "lean" and "clean," there are fewer places for a virus to hide and fewer "side doors" for a hacker to exploit.
The "Clean OS" Edge: In security terms, "Complexity is the enemy of security." Samsung is complex; Alldocube is simple.
Why the "Clean" Alldocube Feels Safer
No Spyware Bloat: Recent reports have flagged Samsung's "AppCloud" as intrusive, essentially acting like pre-installed "legal spyware" that tracks user data. Alldocube doesn't have the budget or the partnerships to install that kind of deep-level tracking.
Zero Background Chatter: On a Samsung, 50 apps are "talking" to servers in the background. On the iPlay 60 Mini Turbo, the "lobby" is empty. If nothing is running, there's nothing to hijack.
The "One Door" Rule: A hacker looking for a way in will choose the building with 500 windows (Samsung) over the windowless stone room (Alldocube), even if the stone room's lock is a year old.
The Bottom Line: Samsung gives you a "Safe" with a thousand holes in it. Alldocube gives you a "Box" with no holes at all.
You may ask, what would happen if I use a really good firewall with my alldocube tablet? If you pair that Alldocube iPlay 60 Mini Turbo with a good firewall, you effectively turn that "one-door barn" into a fortress with a moat.
So lets go back to Google paying Samsung 15-20 Billion... basically, Google has no power and must pay. Samsung has the power and they would rather control information and sell you hardware. They have tried to force simple thing down Samsung's throat and Samsung resisted many times all to save a few pennies.
For nearly 10 years, Google has tried to force Samsung to stop "over-building" their UI because it breaks the way Android is supposed to stay secure. While Google wants a clean, fast update path, Samsung has fought to keep their system complex because that complexity allows them to keep their own apps (Bixby, Samsung Pay) and their third-party deals (the paid "tellers") at the center of the experience.
Here is how that decade-long struggle actually played out:
1. The "Seamless Updates" Battle (2016–2024)
This is the most famous example of Samsung's resistance.
The Tech: In 2016, Google introduced "A/B Partitions" (Seamless Updates). It allows a device to install an update in the background while you keep using it.
The Holdout: Every other major brand (including small ones like Alldocube) adopted it. Samsung refused for 8 years.
Why? Samsung didn't want to give up the storage space required for the second partition, and they wanted to keep their custom "ODIN" installation method. They only finally caved in March 2024 with the Galaxy A55 and the S25 series in 2025.
2. The "Play System Update" Blockade (2025–2026)
As of right now in 2026, there is a new conflict. Users have noticed that even on the newest Galaxy S25, the Google Play System Updates are months behind.
Google's Goal: Google wants to update core security features (like privacy tools and theft protection) directly, bypassing Samsung entirely.
Samsung's Interference: Samsung recently confirmed they intentionally delay these updates. They claim they need to "test" them to make sure Google's code doesn't break Samsung's custom UI.
The Reality: This creates exactly the vulnerability you mentioned. Even if Google has a fix ready for a security flaw, it sits in a "waiting room" because Samsung won't let it through the door.
3. Project Treble: The Failed Peace Treaty
In 2017, Google launched Project Treble to force a separation between the "Android Foundation" and the "Samsung Wallpaper."
The Hope: Google thought this would make updates instant.
The Result: Samsung just built a bigger, more complex "wallpaper" (One UI). Because Samsung modifies so much of the core framework to accommodate their 500+ background processes, they still have to manually re-code every update.
Google is an advertising company first and for most. Google pays Samsung like 15 - 20 billion dollars a year so they have Chrome, Gemini and other google play services on their tablets. This is what the European Union tried to stop. And google pays apple over 20 billion. I am sure based on market share.... google pays a heck of a lot of people. So you go to Youtube and google hits you with advertisement.
So lets go back to Google paying Samsung 15-20 Billion... basically, Google has no power and must pay. Samsung has the power and they would rather control information and sell you hardware. They have tried to force simple thing down Samsung's throat and Samsung resisted many times all to save a few pennies.
For nearly 10 years, Google has tried to force Samsung to stop "over-building" their UI because it breaks the way Android is supposed to stay secure. While Google wants a clean, fast update path, Samsung has fought to keep their system complex because that complexity allows them to keep their own apps (Bixby, Samsung Pay) and their third-party deals (the paid "tellers") at the center of the experience.
Here is how that decade-long struggle actually played out:
1. The "Seamless Updates" Battle (2016–2024)
This is the most famous example of Samsung's resistance.
The Tech: In 2016, Google introduced "A/B Partitions" (Seamless Updates). It allows a device to install an update in the background while you keep using it.
The Holdout: Every other major brand (including small ones like Alldocube) adopted it. Samsung refused for 8 years.
Why? Samsung didn't want to give up the storage space required for the second partition, and they wanted to keep their custom "ODIN" installation method. They only finally caved in March 2024 with the Galaxy A55 and the S25 series in 2025.
2. The "Play System Update" Blockade (2025–2026)
As of right now in 2026, there is a new conflict. Users have noticed that even on the newest Galaxy S25, the Google Play System Updates are months behind.
Google's Goal: Google wants to update core security features (like privacy tools and theft protection) directly, bypassing Samsung entirely.
Samsung's Interference: Samsung recently confirmed they intentionally delay these updates. They claim they need to "test" them to make sure Google's code doesn't break Samsung's custom UI.
The Reality: This creates exactly the vulnerability you mentioned. Even if Google has a fix ready for a security flaw, it sits in a "waiting room" because Samsung won't let it through the door.
3. Project Treble: The Failed Peace Treaty
In 2017, Google launched Project Treble to force a separation between the "Android Foundation" and the "Samsung Wallpaper."
The Hope: Google thought this would make updates instant.
The Result: Samsung just built a bigger, more complex "wallpaper" (One UI). Because Samsung modifies so much of the core framework to accommodate their 500+ background processes, they still have to manually re-code every update.
It is Samsung... the largest market share in the USA.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment