Slickdeals is community-supported. We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
TCL 98-Inch Class X11K Series QD-Mini LED 4K UHD Google Smart TV Ultra Premium Mini-LED TV - QLED, 144hz, Anti-Reflective Screen, Bang & Olufsen Audio, Dolby Atmos $4404.00
TCL 98-Inch Class X11K Series QD-Mini LED 4K UHD Google Smart TV Ultra Premium Mini-LED TV - QLED, 144hz, Anti-Reflective Screen, Bang & Olufsen Audio, Dolby Atmos $4404.00
Lowest price I've seen on this model. Most dimming zones of any Mini-LED, except for its successor, the X11L, which costs more than double at the moment.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Lowest price I've seen on this model. Most dimming zones of any Mini-LED, except for its successor, the X11L, which costs more than double at the moment.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
The 98 inch QM8K will likely be available again for under $3000. If not, it's successor should be available in July based on historical pricing (the 98 QM8K was first available for $2999 with free delivery & mounting included in July 2025).
The X11K is technically superior, but it is effectively a "supercar" TV—you are paying a massive premium for performance that is only visible in the most extreme 1% of scenes (like starry nights or cave scenes). For 99% of content, the QM8K looks nearly identical for $1,400 less.
Not a bad price for what it is though - priced comparable to a 98 inch Sony Bravia 5, which gets destroyed by the sub $2000 98 QM7K, nevermind the QM8K or this.
The "Zone" Gap (5,000 vs. 14,000): This is the main reason for the price hike.
QM8K: With ~5,000 zones, blacks are incredibly deep. You might see very faint blooming around white text on a black background if you look closely in a pitch-black room.
X11K: With 14,000 zones, the TV mimics an OLED. The lighting is so precise that blooming is essentially non-existent.
Real World: Unless you place them side-by-side, you won't notice the difference in standard HDR movies. The QM8K is already brighter and punchier than almost any cinema screen, and is superior to comparably priced Sony, LG, and Samsung products.
Brightness (5,000 vs. 6,500 nits):
Both are painfully bright. 5,000 nits is already enough to make you squint at reflections (sun off a car hood). Diminishing returns on the increased brightness in real world use.
Last edited by MostBased February 8, 2026 at 06:09 AM.
8
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I have used OLEDs exclusively for about a decade now. I have both a 77 inch Samsung QD-OLED S90C and an LG 77 C1. I purchased the 98 inch QM8K from shop my exchange a few months ago and it's absolutely amazing. You can't get OLED above 83 inches unless you want to spend 5 figures. It's a great TV. Almost as good as OLED.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
16 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
The X11K is technically superior, but it is effectively a "supercar" TV—you are paying a massive premium for performance that is only visible in the most extreme 1% of scenes (like starry nights or cave scenes). For 99% of content, the QM8K looks nearly identical for $1,400 less.
Not a bad price for what it is though - priced comparable to a 98 inch Sony Bravia 5, which gets destroyed by the sub $2000 98 QM7K, nevermind the QM8K or this.
The "Zone" Gap (5,000 vs. 14,000): This is the main reason for the price hike.
QM8K: With ~5,000 zones, blacks are incredibly deep. You might see very faint blooming around white text on a black background if you look closely in a pitch-black room.
X11K: With 14,000 zones, the TV mimics an OLED. The lighting is so precise that blooming is essentially non-existent.
Real World: Unless you place them side-by-side, you won't notice the difference in standard HDR movies. The QM8K is already brighter and punchier than almost any cinema screen, and is superior to comparably priced Sony, LG, and Samsung products.
Brightness (5,000 vs. 6,500 nits):
Both are painfully bright. 5,000 nits is already enough to make you squint at reflections (sun off a car hood). Diminishing returns on the increased brightness in real world use.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It's like saying "lambo is still king" when you see a GT55 at $50k
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!