Newly Developed Concentric Driver Featuring a 4" Aluminum Midrange and a 1" Wide-Roll Surround Tweeter
New Triple Single-piece Aluminum Cone 5-1/4" Bass Drivers
6-Ohm Nominal impedance for compatibility with virtually all receivers and amplifiers
Front Firing Ports Allow for Flexible Room Placement
Connector type: 5-Way Binding Post
Community Notes
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
This is great price and an excellent speaker. The concentric tweeter/midrange is fairly hard to find in center speakers and creates phenomenally clear dialog. It drives me nuts when dialog has big dips in frequencies, and I had no complaints with this speaker. The Debut Reference, although not concentric, is also excellent if you prefer non-metallic drivers.
I've had this speaker for years and it's worked really well for me. It was an upgrade from a Pioneer Andrew Jones center that I had used for years. When I initially bought this, I was having some major phase issues and I believe one or more of the speakers were wired out of phase internally. After replacing it, I've enjoyed this speaker.
Thank you so much! I've been eyeing this since last year's Black Friday, but there wasn't a sale for it going on. That time, it was just the SVS Prime.
After checking all the reviews for centers (looking for a 3-way) and based on my limited TV stand space, this fits the bill!
Thank you so much! I've been eyeing this since last year's Black Friday, but there wasn't a sale for it going on. That time, it was just the SVS Prime.
After checking all the reviews for centers (looking for a 3-way) and based on my limited TV stand space, this fits the bill!
Why did you choose this one over the svs prime? I'd been waiting for that one to go on sale (and wasn't in the market on BF).
Why did you choose this one over the svs prime? I'd been waiting for that one to go on sale (and wasn't in the market on BF).
I'm not by any means an audiophile, but there does seem to be a bit of back and forth whether one is better than the other (SVS Prime vs UC52). Some people on Reddit would say the Prime is a step up above the UC52, but I figure the UC52 has actually only been going up in price recently which may mean it's holding up well in its quality and even resell value.
In my initial research, I mostly based it on this list where the UC52 is listed pretty well next to some higher priced 3-way centers: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...aos.28296/
And also looking at the frequency response curves for both, I figured the UC52 would have a more even response curve that is supposed to be more ideal. The SVS's seems a little wonky in the middle frequencies there and some said it would sound "bright", but I'm not sure what that may mean unless I test both. My Onkyo Receiver has DIRAC Live, so this should help with any other adjustments of the UC52 depending on my living room setup but with probably less correction than the Prime.
Elac UC52 data: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...rin.29845/
SVS Prime data: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...rin.29847/
Another thing is that when people who had both the SVS Prime and SVS Ultra compared both of them, they said the SVS Ultra was a step better and so I didn't want to put myself in this loop of thinking what if I invested a bit more for the next tier up. Meanwhile, based on these older reviews of the UC52, it's already punching above its weight-class IMO.
Lastly, just for aesthetics, I have a smaller space under the TV in my TV stand and the UC52 would look better under it. I considered the Monoprice Monolith 365C, but that wouldn't fit and the SVS Prime looked similarly a bit out of place.
The 340SE2 will be far more dynamic and easier to drive to higher volumes with an entry-level receiver. The UniFi series are one of the strongest ELAC model lines but they are low impedance AND low sensitivity so you will need beefy amplification to get them to sound as nice as professional reviewers (who often use separates not AVRs) claim. The second generation UniFI speakers are slightly less bad in this regard than the first gen, where there was massive user blowback for their being so power-hungry.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'm not by any means an audiophile, but there does seem to be a bit of back and forth whether one is better than the other (SVS Prime vs UC52). Some people on Reddit would say the Prime is a step up above the UC52, but I figure the UC52 has actually only been going up in price recently which may mean it's holding up well in its quality and even resell value.
In my initial research, I mostly based it on this list where the UC52 is listed pretty well next to some higher priced 3-way centers: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...aos.28296/
And also looking at the frequency response curves for both, I figured the UC52 would have a more even response curve that is supposed to be more ideal. The SVS's seems a little wonky in the middle frequencies there and some said it would sound "bright", but I'm not sure what that may mean unless I test both. My Onkyo Receiver has DIRAC Live, so this should help with any other adjustments of the UC52 depending on my living room setup but with probably less correction than the Prime.
Elac UC52 data: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...rin.29845/
SVS Prime data: https://www.audiosciencereview.co...rin.29847/
Another thing is that when people who had both the SVS Prime and SVS Ultra compared both of them, they said the SVS Ultra was a step better and so I didn't want to put myself in this loop of thinking what if I invested a bit more for the next tier up. Meanwhile, based on these older reviews of the UC52, it's already punching above its weight-class IMO.
Lastly, just for aesthetics, I have a smaller space under the TV in my TV stand and the UC52 would look better under it. I considered the Monoprice Monolith 365C, but that wouldn't fit and the SVS Prime looked similarly a bit out of place.
No need to overthink, just order both and AB them---SVS provides "free' return shipping (quotes used because it's clearly built into their pricing) and the UC52 if bought from Amazon is free to ship back within 30 days, or $13 flat rate return shipping within 60 days if bought from Crutchfield.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
19 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
After checking all the reviews for centers (looking for a 3-way) and based on my limited TV stand space, this fits the bill!
After checking all the reviews for centers (looking for a 3-way) and based on my limited TV stand space, this fits the bill!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In my initial research, I mostly based it on this list where the UC52 is listed pretty well next to some higher priced 3-way centers:
https://www.audioscienc
And also looking at the frequency response curves for both, I figured the UC52 would have a more even response curve that is supposed to be more ideal. The SVS's seems a little wonky in the middle frequencies there and some said it would sound "bright", but I'm not sure what that may mean unless I test both. My Onkyo Receiver has DIRAC Live, so this should help with any other adjustments of the UC52 depending on my living room setup but with probably less correction than the Prime.
Elac UC52 data: https://www.audioscienc
SVS Prime data: https://www.audioscienc
Another thing is that when people who had both the SVS Prime and SVS Ultra compared both of them, they said the SVS Ultra was a step better and so I didn't want to put myself in this loop of thinking what if I invested a bit more for the next tier up. Meanwhile, based on these older reviews of the UC52, it's already punching above its weight-class IMO.
Lastly, just for aesthetics, I have a smaller space under the TV in my TV stand and the UC52 would look better under it. I considered the Monoprice Monolith 365C, but that wouldn't fit and the SVS Prime looked similarly a bit out of place.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In my initial research, I mostly based it on this list where the UC52 is listed pretty well next to some higher priced 3-way centers:
https://www.audioscienc
And also looking at the frequency response curves for both, I figured the UC52 would have a more even response curve that is supposed to be more ideal. The SVS's seems a little wonky in the middle frequencies there and some said it would sound "bright", but I'm not sure what that may mean unless I test both. My Onkyo Receiver has DIRAC Live, so this should help with any other adjustments of the UC52 depending on my living room setup but with probably less correction than the Prime.
Elac UC52 data: https://www.audioscienc
SVS Prime data: https://www.audioscienc
Another thing is that when people who had both the SVS Prime and SVS Ultra compared both of them, they said the SVS Ultra was a step better and so I didn't want to put myself in this loop of thinking what if I invested a bit more for the next tier up. Meanwhile, based on these older reviews of the UC52, it's already punching above its weight-class IMO.
Lastly, just for aesthetics, I have a smaller space under the TV in my TV stand and the UC52 would look better under it. I considered the Monoprice Monolith 365C, but that wouldn't fit and the SVS Prime looked similarly a bit out of place.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!