Slickdeals is community-supported. We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
TCL 75 Inch Class QM8K Series | Mini LED QLED 4K HDR | 75QM8K, 2025 Model | 120HZ-144HZ Anti Reflective Wide Angle Screen Smart Google TV Dolby Atmos $1,447.99 $1447.99
TCL 75 Inch Class QM8K Series | Mini LED QLED 4K HDR | 75QM8K, 2025 Model | 120HZ-144HZ Anti Reflective Wide Angle Screen Smart Google TV Dolby Atmos $1,447.99 $1447.99
also on Best Buy[bestbuy.com]
Size: 65 inches $999.99
Size: 75 inches $1,447.99
Size: 85 inches $2,199.99
Size: 98 inches $2,997.99
Community Notes
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
The QM8K stands out as a very bright Mini LED QLED TV with strong HDR impact, better bright room performance, and less haloing than the QM7K. It is also praised for crisp picture quality at angles and a Google TV interface that feels packed with features. The main caution is value, since the 75 inch gap over the QM7K is often framed as small and price swings are frequent. That makes it a strong premium option when the sale price is close enough.
people who watch in a bright living room and want strong HDR highlights because commenters say the QM8K gets very bright and can overcome more glare in a bright-room setup.
75-inch shoppers deciding between QM7K and QM8K because multiple commenters argue the 8K is only about $150 more on the 75" and that it doesn't make sense to pick older tech for such a small difference.
buyers who want a TV that stays crisp at wide viewing angles because one owner says it looks "very bright and crisp at any range or angle," and they chose it for that usability.
shoppers who prefer Google TV's app-style experience because a commenter compares it to "an android phone" and says it's fun for discovering features and content.
home theater / AV research buyers who want to minimize haloing from mini-LED local dimming because commenters cite sources saying the QM8K's mini-LED local dimming is improved with less haloing than the QM7K.
buyers who are mainly trying to maximize value versus waiting for QM7K sales because commenters say the QM7K can drop to around $999 fairly regularly, making the QM8K's extra cost less compelling if you're willing to wait.
people worried about reflections in a bright room because one commenter says they're "so wary about its reflections" with white walls, lamps, and their living room setup.
shoppers who don't want to pay a large price premium for incremental gains because one commenter argues the performance increase is minimal and not worth a $500+ differential when sales/price drops happen frequently.
people who are sensitive to eye strain and are expecting OLED-like performance because one commenter chose the QM8K specifically to avoid OLED headaches, implying OLED is the alternative they were trying to escape.
The QM8K is brighter, handles HDR highlights and bright-room glare better, and has improved mini-LED local dimming with less haloing. For the 75-inch, the price gap is often cited as about $150, which makes the upgrade easier to justify than a larger premium.
The higher peak brightness helps it overcome glare better than the QM7K, and it is described as bright and crisp even at angles. A room with white walls and lamps can still raise reflection concerns, so placement and ambient light matter.
It can be a better fit if OLED displays cause headaches or eye strain, because the panel is described as very bright and crisp without that issue. The Google TV interface is also noted as easy to use, with a lot of features packed in.
7K pretty regularly drops to $999. I have one on order from Amazon waiting for stock at that price now. So it's really a $500 difference in the end if you wait a tiny bit.
You make zero sense on your posts. It's almost like you want to justify your purchases. I can't follow your train of thought. You talk about the sweet spot in prices, but when looking at today's prices, as they sit, it's a minimal difference to get a MUCH better tv. However you justify with abstract information and your unverified empirical research. Then talk about your purchase is backordered. You are a strange dude. The 8k is better no matter how you want to spin it.
You make zero sense on your posts. It's almost like you want to justify your purchases. I can't follow your train of thought. You talk about the sweet spot in prices, but when looking at today's prices, as they sit, it's a minimal difference to get a MUCH better tv. However you justify with abstract information and your unverified empirical research. Then talk about your purchase is backordered. You are a strange dude. The 8k is better no matter how you want to spin it.
Please have your mom bring your meds to the basement.
WTF are you talking about? Of course the 8k is better than the 7k. But the performance increase is minimal and isn't worth a $500+ differential, which is usually is if you wait for a sale, which happens frequently.
Please have your mom bring your meds to the basement.WTF are you talking about? Of course the 8k is better than the 7k. But the performance increase is minimal and isn't worth a $500+ differential, which is usually is if you wait for a sale, which happens frequently.
I think you need to reread this thread and see the things you are posting. You don't make sense. First off, the difference was $150 for the 8k for the 75" from the 7k. That's it. Not $500. You have made several posts "how it's not much of a difference" basically ignoring those facts to stick with your 7k. It is you my young padawan that needs an uptick in those meds.
I think you need to reread this thread and see the things you are posting. You don't make sense. First off, the difference was $150 for the 8k for the 75" from the 7k. That's it. Not $500. You have made several posts "how it's not much of a difference" basically ignoring those facts to stick with your 7k. It is you my young padawan that needs an uptick in those meds.
Community Reviews
The QM8K stands out as a very bright Mini LED QLED TV with strong HDR impact, better bright room performance, and less haloing than the QM7K. It is also praised for crisp picture quality at angles and a Google TV interface that feels packed with features. The main caution is value, since the 75 inch gap over the QM7K is often framed as small and price swings are frequent. That makes it a strong premium option when the sale price is close enough.
people who watch in a bright living room and want strong HDR highlights because commenters say the QM8K gets very bright and can overcome more glare in a bright-room setup.
75-inch shoppers deciding between QM7K and QM8K because multiple commenters argue the 8K is only about $150 more on the 75" and that it doesn't make sense to pick older tech for such a small difference.
buyers who want a TV that stays crisp at wide viewing angles because one owner says it looks "very bright and crisp at any range or angle," and they chose it for that usability.
shoppers who prefer Google TV's app-style experience because a commenter compares it to "an android phone" and says it's fun for discovering features and content.
home theater / AV research buyers who want to minimize haloing from mini-LED local dimming because commenters cite sources saying the QM8K's mini-LED local dimming is improved with less haloing than the QM7K.
buyers who are mainly trying to maximize value versus waiting for QM7K sales because commenters say the QM7K can drop to around $999 fairly regularly, making the QM8K's extra cost less compelling if you're willing to wait.
people worried about reflections in a bright room because one commenter says they're "so wary about its reflections" with white walls, lamps, and their living room setup.
shoppers who don't want to pay a large price premium for incremental gains because one commenter argues the performance increase is minimal and not worth a $500+ differential when sales/price drops happen frequently.
people who are sensitive to eye strain and are expecting OLED-like performance because one commenter chose the QM8K specifically to avoid OLED headaches, implying OLED is the alternative they were trying to escape.
Common Questions (3)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The L series should be out next month so expect these '25 models to start going on closeout shortly.
WTF are you talking about? Of course the 8k is better than the 7k. But the performance increase is minimal and isn't worth a $500+ differential, which is usually is if you wait for a sale, which happens frequently.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!