Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Apr 27, 2026 07:17 AM
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Apr 27, 2026 07:17 AM

$199* | 27" ASUS ROG Strix 1440P 180Hz IPS 1ms USB-C Monitor at Amazon

$199

$299

33% off
Amazon
5 Comments 2,524 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has 27" ASUS ROG Strix 1440P 180Hz IPS 1ms USB-C Monitor for $199.
Shipping is free.

Price
$100 lower (33% savings) than the list price of $299
$94.09 lower (32% savings) than the previous price of $293.09

*Previous Frontpage Deal at $199 with 31 Deal Score and 15 comments.

Customer reviews
4.4⭐ / 61
50+ bought in past month

amazon.com/dp/B0CZWZKQP3 [amazon.com]

Please report the deal if expired (click report -> expired)
My other deals

#pfpd
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has 27" ASUS ROG Strix 1440P 180Hz IPS 1ms USB-C Monitor for $199.
Shipping is free.

Price
$100 lower (33% savings) than the list price of $299
$94.09 lower (32% savings) than the previous price of $293.09

*Previous Frontpage Deal at $199 with 31 Deal Score and 15 comments.

Customer reviews
4.4⭐ / 61
50+ bought in past month

amazon.com/dp/B0CZWZKQP3 [amazon.com]

Please report the deal if expired (click report -> expired)
My other deals

#pfpd

Community Voting

Deal Score
+10
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: ASUS ROG Strix 27' 1440P USB-C HDR Gaming Monitor (XG27ACG-W) - White, QHD, 180Hz, 1ms, Fast IPS, DCI-P3 95%, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-Sync...

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 5/21/2026, 12:31 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$299
NewEgg$299
Best Buy$325.59

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

5 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Apr 27, 2026 08:46 PM
353 Posts
Joined Jul 2008
apull
Pro
Apr 27, 2026 08:46 PM
353 Posts
This seems like a pretty solid buy. Anyone aware of major cons? I have a 27" 4k, but that rez is too high for a 27" on osx
Apr 28, 2026 03:07 PM
29 Posts
Joined Apr 2025
MaroonBook2983Apr 28, 2026 03:07 PM
29 Posts
Quote from apull :
This seems like a pretty solid buy. Anyone aware of major cons? I have a 27" 4k, but that rez is too high for a 27" on osx
Bought a couple months back. Very nice quality and screen. Bright and colors are great. Much nicer than the Acer.
Apr 29, 2026 08:43 AM
10 Posts
Joined Nov 2019
PurpleSeagull7111Apr 29, 2026 08:43 AM
10 Posts
Quote from apull :
This seems like a pretty solid buy. Anyone aware of major cons? I have a 27" 4k, but that rez is too high for a 27" on osx
What do you mean the rez is too high? I know ppl rec a 32in for 4k, but is it that noticeable?
Apr 29, 2026 08:57 AM
273 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
GreyoutApr 29, 2026 08:57 AM
273 Posts
Quote from PurpleSeagull7111 :
What do you mean the rez is too high? I know ppl rec a 32in for 4k, but is it that noticeable?
Not the op, but I've been using a triple monitor setup with one 32" 4K and two 27" - one in 1440p and other in 4K. Messy, I know. They are all within 2.5' viewing distance and the 27" 4K is sharp but not by much, but I have to change the scaling on that one because everything looks tiny at native res and it can get annoying at times when I drag windows between monitors and scaling gets locked into one res or the other. If I could do it over again, I would have just gotten all in 32" @ 4k, or settle for all in 27" but keep to 1440p and go for higher refresh and response time instead.
Pro
Apr 30, 2026 02:24 PM
353 Posts
Joined Jul 2008
apull
Pro
Apr 30, 2026 02:24 PM
353 Posts
Quote from PurpleSeagull7111 :
What do you mean the rez is too high? I know ppl rec a 32in for 4k, but is it that noticeable?
Your computer displays items by lighting up pixels. A 4k display has more pixels than a 1440p display, so if you have the same physical sized screen, the pixels on the 4k display will show smaller to your eye (more pixels crammed into the same physical space). A toolbar that is 80 pixels high will therefore look smaller to you on a 4k screen than a 1440p screen.
To compensate for this, software can often re-size what is displayed on the screen into a different number of pixels, but the way your software programs handle this resizing is inconsistent, and it's hard to make it look good when you take 1 pixel and turn it into 1.3 pixels. (How can you light up one-third of a pixel?). So it's better to either get exactly the right resolution to start, or get an even multiple. At 27", that means getting either a 1440p monitor, OR a 5k, which allows you to rescale exactly 1:2. (Those are very expensive though)
At 32", the physical pixels are pretty much ideally-sized for a 4k screen, at 27" you want 1440p, and at 24" 1080p is good. 4K also works very well at 24" since 4k is exactly double the height and width of 1080p in pixels, so you can scale it perfectly and it looks very sharp. For a 27" display, 5k is double 1440p, and in fact that's what Apple likes to do with their displays.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals