Various Retailers have American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin (eBook) on sale for $1.99.
Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for sharing this deal.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Various Retailers have American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin (eBook) on sale for $1.99.
Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for sharing this deal.
I'm curious - I rarely see a Barnes and Noble link included in ebook sales posts like this one despite offering the same prices. Are Nooks just not that popular?
I'm curious - I rarely see a Barnes and Noble link included in ebook sales posts like this one despite offering the same prices. Are Nooks just not that popular?
A very interesting and relevant story that drags a little at times.
Other than simply telling the story, the author's primary purpose is clearing Oppenheimer's name of the accusations from McCarthy and other small/jealous men that his left-leaning associations/comments/philanthropy represented a security risk large enough to justify essentially ruining his career (and losing his massive scientific and administrative talents).
As a result, the highly-detailed "here's why these accusations are invalid" arguments get a bit repetitive after the first few versions. It's valuable information and necessary to tell the story, just breaks up the narrative flow a bit.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
11 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Other than simply telling the story, the author's primary purpose is clearing Oppenheimer's name of the accusations from McCarthy and other small/jealous men that his left-leaning associations/comments/philanthropy represented a security risk large enough to justify essentially ruining his career (and losing his massive scientific and administrative talents).
As a result, the highly-detailed "here's why these accusations are invalid" arguments get a bit repetitive after the first few versions. It's valuable information and necessary to tell the story, just breaks up the narrative flow a bit.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!