The influence of intellectuals is not only greater than in previous eras but also takes a very different form from that envisioned by those like Machiavelli and others who have wanted to directly influence rulers. It has not been by shaping the opinions or directing the actions of the holders of power that modern intellectuals have most influenced the course of events, but by shaping public opinion in ways that affect the actions of power holders in democratic societies, whether or not those power holders accept the general vision or the particular policies favored by intellectuals. Even government leaders with disdain or contempt for intellectuals have had to bend to the climate of opinion shaped by those intellectuals.
Intellectuals and Society not only examines the track record of intellectuals in the things they have advocated but also analyzes the incentives and constraints under which their views and visions have emerged. One of the most surprising aspects of this study is how often intellectuals have been proved not only wrong, but grossly and disastrously wrong in their prescriptions for the ills of society -- and how little their views have changed in response to empirical evidence of the disasters entailed by those views.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
The influence of intellectuals is not only greater than in previous eras but also takes a very different form from that envisioned by those like Machiavelli and others who have wanted to directly influence rulers. It has not been by shaping the opinions or directing the actions of the holders of power that modern intellectuals have most influenced the course of events, but by shaping public opinion in ways that affect the actions of power holders in democratic societies, whether or not those power holders accept the general vision or the particular policies favored by intellectuals. Even government leaders with disdain or contempt for intellectuals have had to bend to the climate of opinion shaped by those intellectuals.
Intellectuals and Society not only examines the track record of intellectuals in the things they have advocated but also analyzes the incentives and constraints under which their views and visions have emerged. One of the most surprising aspects of this study is how often intellectuals have been proved not only wrong, but grossly and disastrously wrong in their prescriptions for the ills of society -- and how little their views have changed in response to empirical evidence of the disasters entailed by those views.
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank wysiwyg1652
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
Endorsements by Steve Forbes and the National Review lend support to your assertion.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Wolfgangsicle
He is a brilliant "normie", rejecting socialism and Marxism, even though he used to be a Marxist himself and wrote an explanatory book about Marxism.
His extreme focus is on empirical reality, understanding the world instead of changing it.
In that sense he would never fit in today's far-left academy, where in many Himanities and Social Science departments 0% of the professors are either Republican or conservative and Woke groupthink is the rule.
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
If the attacks are valid, it's probably worth the read. Now let's see how open-minded the self-professed party of open-mindedness actually is.
12
6
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sorry, leaving politics aside, analyzing a problem and arguing with selected evidence itself is intellectualism. If this dude is arguing that 'intellectuals bad' and that 'group think is bad' with any credibility, he would literally be arguing that reader should distrust what he is saying - because that makes him an intellectual. So, he is too smart and distrusts people who are smart? I am a bit lost on the logic here.
Thomas Sowell's views are far-right / Libertarian and he focuses on attacking left-wing intellectuals in this book. Just so that you know what you are buying.
Sorry, leaving politics aside, analyzing a problem and arguing with selected evidence itself is intellectualism. If this dude is arguing that 'intellectuals bad' and that 'group think is bad' with any credibility, he would literally be arguing that reader should distrust what he is saying - because that makes him an intellectual. So, he is too smart and distrusts people who are smart? I am a bit lost on the logic here.
Well, if that is what you take away, I would call that a good thing. Read EVERYTHING with a critical eye.
But if you think that intellectualism is a bad thing, then at least being aware of it is a good start.
Well, if that is what you take away, I would call that a good thing. Read EVERYTHING with a critical eye. But if you think that intellectualism is a bad thing, then at least being aware of it is a good start.
Jut to be clear, I don't agree that intellectuals are bad. What's the alternative? We go back to being dumb worshippers to whatever religion tells us is 'the truth' with made-up logic?Without intellectuals, you and I wouldn't even be chatting across the country on smartphones, we would most likely be somewhere close to being beckoned to a church or a wealthy king/baron. I am skeptical anytime someone directly or indirectly says that people who think as full time job and tell us what their analysis revealed are bad or malicious. Sure, I won't trust everything that comes out of their findings until I read their methodology evidence and counter arguments. But, taking a stand that we need to blanket mistrust them is indirectly signaling us to go back to race, religion, and other base instincts, which is not conducive if we are to survive as species or live better lives.
If the attacks are valid, it's probably worth the read. Now let's see how open-minded the self-professed party of open-mindedness actually is.
At risk of being sea-lioned to providing retorts that just waste time, I'll just say this:
Open minded people are willing to TRY/CONSIDER other perspectives and pathways. They can respect without agreeing. They also understand and are able to entertain outwardly contradictory ideas because nothing is ever black and white when it comes to the social sciences. It isn't the same as being a hypocrite...where you act like one side is the best side but you only entertain the other. Literally defined as an 'actor'.
However, there is/are sides which only purport to do this, and do so in bad faith. Those are the 'show me evidence, give me quotes, links, from vetted sources, blah blah' and then DISAPPEAR when you actually respond because you showed something contrary to the three YouTube videos they watched.
That being said...watch some of sowell's videos on YouTube. Judge for YOURSELF. You can also find similar writings at your local library, or even on the internet archive.
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sowell's followers highlight his economic data to discuss affordability and social decay but strip his analysis of its implications regarding demographic shifts...
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
18 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank wysiwyg1652
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Wolfgangsicle
His extreme focus is on empirical reality, understanding the world instead of changing it.
In that sense he would never fit in today's far-left academy, where in many Himanities and Social Science departments 0% of the professors are either Republican or conservative and Woke groupthink is the rule.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But if you think that intellectualism is a bad thing, then at least being aware of it is a good start.
Quote
from BoastfulBelieve879
[IMG]https://api-web.slickdeals.net/images/misc/backlink.gif[/IMG]
:
Well, if that is what you take away, I would call that a good thing. Read EVERYTHING with a critical eye. But if you think that intellectualism is a bad thing, then at least being aware of it is a good start.
Jut to be clear, I don't agree that intellectuals are bad. What's the alternative? We go back to being dumb worshippers to whatever religion tells us is 'the truth' with made-up logic?Without intellectuals, you and I wouldn't even be chatting across the country on smartphones, we would most likely be somewhere close to being beckoned to a church or a wealthy king/baron. I am skeptical anytime someone directly or indirectly says that people who think as full time job and tell us what their analysis revealed are bad or malicious. Sure, I won't trust everything that comes out of their findings until I read their methodology evidence and counter arguments. But, taking a stand that we need to blanket mistrust them is indirectly signaling us to go back to race, religion, and other base instincts, which is not conducive if we are to survive as species or live better lives.
Open minded people are willing to TRY/CONSIDER other perspectives and pathways. They can respect without agreeing. They also understand and are able to entertain outwardly contradictory ideas because nothing is ever black and white when it comes to the social sciences. It isn't the same as being a hypocrite...where you act like one side is the best side but you only entertain the other. Literally defined as an 'actor'.
However, there is/are sides which only purport to do this, and do so in bad faith. Those are the 'show me evidence, give me quotes, links, from vetted sources, blah blah' and then DISAPPEAR when you actually respond because you showed something contrary to the three YouTube videos they watched.
That being said...watch some of sowell's videos on YouTube. Judge for YOURSELF. You can also find similar writings at your local library, or even on the internet archive.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!