This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Nothing Phone was created by one of One Plus co-founders Carl Pei a Chinese Origin young entrepreneur who had his education in Sweden and the West.
He and Pete Lau found OP and remember they were the original manufacturer to have unlocked bootloaders and cyanogen Mod as the OS. As OP became more and more a part of OPPO Electronics he developed differences with Executive Leadership and started a separate company called Nothing Phone. Basically it is a European brand of what he founded OP.
I dunno I would say an S24 Ultra is the better $500 buy that you can find. It's a year older, but you're getting true flagship hardware, better cameras and zoom, a better display, stronger performance, and the S Pen if youre into that. At the same price, I'd take the depreciated Ultra over the Nothing Phone 3 .. 9 out of 10 times.
Nothing Phone 3 comes across as a clean, well-specced Android with strong RAM and storage, especially in the 512GB model, and the glyph lights still have a niche appeal. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is repeatedly identified as top tier mid range rather than the Snapdragon 8 Elite, so the performance story is solid but not flagship class. At around $500, the weight and screen quality draw criticism, and Verizon compatibility is a concern because of incomplete band coverage. It looks like a better fit for buyers who want the design and specs without expecting full flagship polish.
Android buyers wanting a clean mid-range phone with lots of storage, because the 512GB model is described as fast and the software is considered clean.
Buyers comparing used-flagship alternatives at the same price, because the phone is positioned as a brand-new option against older refurbished devices.
People expecting true flagship performance and cameras, because the chipset is mid-range and the display and camera are described as weaker than top-tier rivals.
No. The phone is listed as using the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, which is a top-tier mid-range chip rather than Qualcomm's Elite flagship tier. The product description should be corrected if it says otherwise.
At this price, it can be a strong value if you want the brand-new 512GB model and Nothing's clean software plus Glyph features. A few commenters still prefer used flagships like the Galaxy S24 Ultra or S25 Ultra at similar money for better cameras, display, and performance.
It does not have complete CDMA/Verizon band coverage, so it is not a good choice for Verizon use. One comment says it may only be missing Band 5, but another specifically warns against using it on Verizon at all.
It weighs 218g, so it is not especially light, but one owner says that weight is manageable. Another owner describes it as heavy and says the screen is mediocre, which matters if you want a lighter-feeling phone.
I don't think it's a Snapdragon Elite as your description says, I'm pretty sure this is a mid-range tier phone.
It isn't the elite series in this one but it is the Snapdragon 8s gen4 which is considered their top tier mid-range chip so it isn't a bad chip by any means but u are correct it isn't their elite series which is their top of the line best chip
I dunno I would say an S24 Ultra is the better $500 buy that you can find. It's a year older, but you're getting true flagship hardware, better cameras and zoom, a better display, stronger performance, and the S Pen if youre into that. At the same price, I'd take the depreciated Ultra over the Nothing Phone 3 .. 9 out of 10 times.
The Nothing Phone for $599 is a great value for anyone looking for a powerful phone without paying flagship prices. With plenty of RAM, massive storage, and 5G connectivity, it offers impressive performance and features for the money. Overall, it's a powerful, stylish phone that delivers excellent bang for your buck.
I dunno I would say an S24 Ultra is the better $500 buy that you can find. It's a year older, but you're getting true flagship hardware, better cameras and zoom, a better display, stronger performance, and the S Pen if youre into that. At the same price, I'd take the depreciated Ultra over the Nothing Phone 3 .. 9 out of 10 times.
Problem is with Samsung is their bootloaders are locked (Knox) Too much of a hassle to root and it is not truly "rooted." Bloatware bogs down the phone.
Ordered and then cancelled the 512Gb model. I'm on verizon and not interested in calling Verizon to register the IMEI number. There are way better options than dealing with a celular company's customer service
Top Comments
He and Pete Lau found OP and remember they were the original manufacturer to have unlocked bootloaders and cyanogen Mod as the OS. As OP became more and more a part of OPPO Electronics he developed differences with Executive Leadership and started a separate company called Nothing Phone. Basically it is a European brand of what he founded OP.
Community Reviews
Nothing Phone 3 comes across as a clean, well-specced Android with strong RAM and storage, especially in the 512GB model, and the glyph lights still have a niche appeal. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is repeatedly identified as top tier mid range rather than the Snapdragon 8 Elite, so the performance story is solid but not flagship class. At around $500, the weight and screen quality draw criticism, and Verizon compatibility is a concern because of incomplete band coverage. It looks like a better fit for buyers who want the design and specs without expecting full flagship polish.
Android buyers wanting a clean mid-range phone with lots of storage, because the 512GB model is described as fast and the software is considered clean.
People who want a $500 daily driver with flagship-like speed, because the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 is described as top-tier mid-range rather than weak.
Shoppers who care about a distinctive notification system, because the glyph lights are useful for some people and easy to ignore for others.
Buyers comparing used-flagship alternatives at the same price, because the phone is positioned as a brand-new option against older refurbished devices.
People expecting true flagship performance and cameras, because the chipset is mid-range and the display and camera are described as weaker than top-tier rivals.
Shoppers who want the strongest long-term value, because trade-in value is expected to be poor and better $500 alternatives are suggested.
Verizon customers needing full network compatibility, because the phone lacks complete CDMA band coverage and can miss Band 5.
Buyers who need a phone that feels light in hand, because it is described as heavy.
Common Questions (4)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
57 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!