Joined Dec 2008
L6: Expert
Forum Thread
How many of you still play games using computer
January 27, 2011 at
11:34 AM
in
Chat
(2)
I was just wondering that this might be an interesting topic to talk about.
I used to play games using my PC 3 years ago, The trouble I found was the constant requirement for upgrades. New games keep demanding more computing and graphics power to play. Finally I gave up on the PC and bought the PS3 instead. Now I feel much happy as I don't have to go through hardware requirements once again.
I still see some sder's interested in powerful graphics card even today.
So the question is...how many of you guys still use the computer to play video games, If yes, then how do you guys keep up with the constant upgrades demanded by the new games these days? If you keep on upgrading, don't you think thats not economical?
Do you guys think switching to XBOX or PS3 makes sense?
Note: Consider only games that require high end graphics like MOH, COD, etc.....
Advantages on using PS3/XBOX 360
1...No need for any hardware upgrade.
2...Games can be easily resold on ebay. No DRM problems.
3...Can use this sitting on a couch and play using a big screen TV. More comfort.
4...Get more controllers, then the whole family can have a very good time with games. More suitable for time pass during special occasions like friends get togethers.
I used to play games using my PC 3 years ago, The trouble I found was the constant requirement for upgrades. New games keep demanding more computing and graphics power to play. Finally I gave up on the PC and bought the PS3 instead. Now I feel much happy as I don't have to go through hardware requirements once again.
I still see some sder's interested in powerful graphics card even today.
So the question is...how many of you guys still use the computer to play video games, If yes, then how do you guys keep up with the constant upgrades demanded by the new games these days? If you keep on upgrading, don't you think thats not economical?
Do you guys think switching to XBOX or PS3 makes sense?
Note: Consider only games that require high end graphics like MOH, COD, etc.....
Advantages on using PS3/XBOX 360
1...No need for any hardware upgrade.
2...Games can be easily resold on ebay. No DRM problems.
3...Can use this sitting on a couch and play using a big screen TV. More comfort.
4...Get more controllers, then the whole family can have a very good time with games. More suitable for time pass during special occasions like friends get togethers.
125 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
RTS games will always be better with a KB / mouse. That's a major backbone of the industry, and the #1 reason why they won't be successful on consoles; consoles don't come with a KB/mouse.
PC games have MUCH higher resolution and look MUCH better. PC games are easier to distribute and require no licensing fees to Sony, MS, or nintendo.
I own an Xbox 360, a PS3, 2 original xboxes, a GC, and 3 desktop computers running Win 7 and a desktop running Win XP.
Flexibility is great. Own them both! Play games on the computer most of the time though!
You have a good point on RTS games. I agree with you on that but not sure if RTS games demand heavy graphics requirement.
Regarding resolution, PS3 can play 1080P resolution on some games smoothly, why is the PC better on this stand point? I find it more relaxing to play the game looking at a big flat screen TV from the couch than sitting close to the computer screen. May be this is just an individual preference.
The reason I mentioned that is because I had seen graphics cards worth $200 in SD front page deals, now add motherboard, memeory (atleast 4GB), processor, etc..., but the PS3 console is only $300. Economically the game console are winners I believe. They even have built in DVD/Blu-Ray Players.
Need a better graphics card? Pay $150-$200. Need more ram? Pay $50. Need a better processor? Pay $200, maybe $300 with a new motherboard if your current socket doesn't support a newer processor. It should be noted, also, that a high-end processor negates the need for a crazy-powerful graphics card.
In any case, I'd prefer to incrementally upgrade a system that's not crazy locked down than have a dumbed down machine that can do only what the manufacturer tells it to do, otherwise I'm breaking the warranty and who knows what else is in the EULA.
Can your PS3 run an SSH server on stock firmware? What about rip DVDs for future playback? Store and transcode video for playback on multiple types of devices? Can you surf the internet easily? How often does the PS3 store have crazy discounts on games like Steam does?
To state "the days of PC based games is coming to an end from economical stand point" is to say one set of needs supersedes all others enough to create a huge shift in the market. I just don't believe that's the case yet and likely won't be anytime soon.
The inclusion of a BD-ROM drive have been a strong point for the PS3 in the past, but SATA BD-ROM drives are regularly what now? $30 to $50? There's also increased utility by utilizing the drive in a computer rather than in a console.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Need a better graphics card? Pay $150-$200. Need more ram? Pay $50. Need a better processor? Pay $200, maybe $300 with a new motherboard if your current socket doesn't support a newer processor. It should be noted, also, that a high-end processor negates the need for a crazy-powerful graphics card.
In any case, I'd prefer to incrementally upgrade a system that's not crazy locked down than have a dumbed down machine that can do only what the manufacturer tells it to do, otherwise I'm breaking the warranty and who knows what else is in the EULA.
Can your PS3 run an SSH server on stock firmware? What about rip DVDs for future playback? Store and transcode video for playback on multiple types of devices? Can you surf the internet easily? How often does the PS3 store have crazy discounts on games like Steam does?
The advantage in console based games is that you can resell them with a fraction of cost loss. The same is with PC games too, but not the ones you buy from steam or similar ones.
For classic games, the computer is still the winner. I do have a computer but without high end graphics on it. When it comes to games I prefer the PS3.
Even if a new version of game console comes out, selling the old version and getting the new version is still economical.
To state "the days of PC based games is coming to an end from economical stand point" is to say one set of needs supersedes all others enough to create a huge shift in the market. I just don't believe that's the case yet and likely won't be anytime soon.
The inclusion of a BD-ROM drive have been a strong point for the PS3 in the past, but SATA BD-ROM drives are regularly what now? $30 to $50? There's also increased utility by utilizing the drive in a computer rather than in a console.
I am not saying this is gonna happen immediately, but I feel the trend had started already, its just a matter of time, may be some years...
Even if a new version of game console comes out, selling the old version and getting the new version is still economical.
Also do I have to upgrade for a different version of Frogger?
I still have a Atari game system. Never needs upgraded.
- This depends on the person. I always have a need for a desktop computer, so making it a "gaming" rig means sticking in a graphics card that costs half of what a PS3 does.
Quote
:
- hope my wife can get through the initial frustration of getting used to the keyboard/mouse control scheme.
Why not plug in a controller?
Quote
:
- buy two copies of each game unless it support non-tethered local multi.
This goes for consoles too, depending on the game. If I want to race Forza or Need for Speed against someone else, they need their own console and copy of the game.
Quote
:
- realize that i'll have to upgrade core components once every 3-4 years.
No, you really don't have to.I still have a Atari game system. Never needs upgraded.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.