Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by OptimusPrimeAutobot • May 15, 2020
frontpage Posted by OptimusPrimeAutobot • May 15, 2020

Brooks Brothers Non-Woven Face Masks (White): 20 for $70, 100 for $300

+ Free S/H w/ Shoprunner & More

5 for $20

Brooks Brothers
406 Comments 399,619 Views
Get Deal at Brooks Brothers
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Many retailers have Face Masks available for sale. Please refer to the forum thread for more options from other retailers as well as additional details & discussion. Thanks OptimusPrimeAutobot, scurrywrx & CheshireChittyChat

Examples:

Brooks Brothers has Non-Woven Face Masks (white) in various quantities listed below. Shipping is free w/ ShopRunner (free to signup).

Note: Three-pleat, single-ply face mask with elastic ear loops and flexible metal contours; tested to filter 86% of particles of 0.3 microns; hand wash w/ soap & water.

Available:Alternatively, Lucky Brand has 5-Pack Reusable Washable Pleated Cotton Face Masks for $25 - $10 when you apply promo code 20UBES in shopping bag = $15. Shipping is $5 or free on $30+ orders.

Note: Non-medical, reusable masks made according to the specs of LAProtects.org. Wash before first use and routinely thereafter.

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
Please refer to the forum thread for many more deal ideas & discussion. -StrawMan86

Original Post

Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Many retailers have Face Masks available for sale. Please refer to the forum thread for more options from other retailers as well as additional details & discussion. Thanks OptimusPrimeAutobot, scurrywrx & CheshireChittyChat

Examples:

Brooks Brothers has Non-Woven Face Masks (white) in various quantities listed below. Shipping is free w/ ShopRunner (free to signup).

Note: Three-pleat, single-ply face mask with elastic ear loops and flexible metal contours; tested to filter 86% of particles of 0.3 microns; hand wash w/ soap & water.

Available:Alternatively, Lucky Brand has 5-Pack Reusable Washable Pleated Cotton Face Masks for $25 - $10 when you apply promo code 20UBES in shopping bag = $15. Shipping is $5 or free on $30+ orders.

Note: Non-medical, reusable masks made according to the specs of LAProtects.org. Wash before first use and routinely thereafter.

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
Please refer to the forum thread for many more deal ideas & discussion. -StrawMan86

Original Post

Community Voting

Deal Score
+280
Good Deal
Get Deal at Brooks Brothers

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

kovy
9972 Posts
4699 Reputation
You have to put a roll of tissue paper along the top inside border of your masks to prevent to moisture from your breathing to penetrate toward your glasses.
Aagupta2
7 Posts
14 Reputation
I wear will also wear a N95... If I'm in the ER admitting a patient or when I'm seeing my respiratory patients. Simple surgeons mask for the rest of the hospital, and I wear a cloth mask in public. Cloth mask aren't a joke. They reduce the spread of disease, and it is the one way everyone does there part to fight the virus.
coursesix
643 Posts
415 Reputation
There is a lot of misunderstanding and misinformation regarding masks and COVID.

-Masks serve two purposes: 1) filtering your exhaust (ie, preventing transmission to others), which is their main role. and 2) filtering your intake (ie, preventing you from getting it).

-Masks work and should be our main weapon against the virus. The example I give is driving down a highway in LA during rush hour with your windows down-- you get exposed to a lot of car pollution. You can try to reduce pollution by making cars be 6 ft apart (social distancing), but that only works a bit, and it makes traffic worse. You can tell people to stay home and not drive, which helps pollution, but then the economy suffers since people aren't working. So what do you do? You have people close their windows and drive with AC/filtration of input (mask while inhaling), and you make sure the cars have catalytic converters (mask while exhaling). Then people can be protected, without letting the economy take a nosedive.

-If you wait for data/results of studies, then you have missed the boat. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. We have to make decisions based on logic and our understanding of similar pathogens.

-The infection is predominantly spread through droplet transmission. Droplet is different from airborne-- the latter means much smaller particles. Examples of airborne spread includes: VZV (chickenpox), smallpox, rubeola, TB (TB is not a virus). Droplet spread are most other respiratory viruses, including influenza and coronaviruses.

-In the hospital setting, patients with droplet infections get "droplet precautions" -- ie, everyone must wear a surgical mask while entering the room. Those on airborne precautions are typically in negative pressure rooms and require use of an N95 on entry. When patients on airborne precautions (eg TB) are transported around the hospital, the patient wears a surgical mask (not N95) to help prevent the spread to others.

-N95 and surgical masks likely afford similar levels of protection in preventing the wearer from getting droplet-borne viruses. Source: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/...le/2749214

-Droplets are not only spread through coughing/sneezing, but are also spread by talking ("say it, don't spray it") and likely to a lesser extent by breathing

-The major reason that everyone should wear masks in public is because they help prevent an infected person from spreading it.

-This paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903751
shows that cloth masks are inferior to surgical for protecting the WEARER from another droplet born virus (influenza). Note that the control group wasn't mask-less in the study, they did standard care (ie, masking for pts on droplet precautions).

-Despite that, cloth masks likely help prevent spread from infected patients. Even though the weave may not be tight enough to prevent tiny droplets or aersolized particles from coming out, those are also much less infective (lower viral load) than big droplets. Recalling that droplets from speech and saliva are likely a large part of the spread, you can imagine that even without the tightest weave that your ability to expel big globs of saliva are much lower when wearing a cloth mask, esp if it has multiple layers.

-There is likely a substantial number of people who have been infected with minimal or no symptoms. There are multiple lines of evidence supporting this. Here is what I consider to be a landmark paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240128. Basically when they tested everyone in a nursing home, about 50% of those with the virus had no symptoms, but still had viral titers (ie, were very infectious to others). When they checked on them a week later, about 75% of them had developed symptoms, while 25% remained asymptomatic. The takeaways are that in this population about 1/8 of people were infected but had no symptoms (yet still were highly contagious), and that it is common for people to be contagious before they have symptoms. The end result is that we must assume that everyone we encounter could have the virus (and that we could have it as well), and so everyone should wear masks.

-Serology data has also shown the number infected is much higher than what we thought, but still relatively low (a few % in PNW).

-I suspect herd immunity is not possible in this virus, due to its very high infectivity rate. This is why much like smallpox and polio, there needs to be universal mandated vaccinations.

-The young/healthy are likely large vectors of infection. Just because you have a low mortality rate, doesn't mean you can enjoy yourself without precautions, as your grandmother likely has a much higher mortality rate.

-The magic number of "two weeks" for quarantine is not based on how long you are infected; in fact viral carriage (esp through GI shedding) is much longer than 2 weeks. Instead, the two weeks refers to the max length of time between exposure and development of symptoms (usual is 3-5 days). But again, if 1/8 of people never manifest symptoms (and maybe much more than that when you consider serology data and younger populations), to me this 2 week rule doesn't make a lot of sense.

-You can see pictures of Shanghai disney, schools that re-opened in China, etc. Everyone is wearing masks. It's not due to culture. Masks work and this shouldn't be a debate.

-This virus and the news media coverage of it has created too much polarity. Masking is not a political issue. It is a cultural issue. Americans need to accept that wearing a mask is a sign of respect for those around you, much like covering your mouth when you sneeze/cough. And when you approach others without a mask on, you are putting them at risk.

-My vision for the next few months: country rolls out mandatory mask law while in public, with fines for those who don't comply (or worse, send them to jail where they will 100% get COVID). This can allow people to return to work and school. The six foot social distancing rule (which I think is total BS btw) will get relaxed to 3 feet, as long as everyone is masked. Work places will be required to have better ventilation/air exchange with outside. Restaurants will stay closed, except ones that have open air seating, and even then there will be limitations on number of patrons.

-As posted earlier, this graph nicely shows the rates of new infection in countries without mask laws vs those with mask laws (or populations that voluntarily mask):

shorturl.at/gxIW6

TL;DR: Please wear a facial covering (cloth mask, surgical mask, scarf, whatever) while in public to diminish the spread. It is your civic duty.

405 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Joined May 2019
May 15, 2020
Mr_Sadness
May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Quote from Mr_Sadness :
Disposable medical-grade mask are only 60¢ each and provide a Bacteria Filtration Efficiency (BFE) > 95%; therefore, it protects the user from sneeze spray. The disposable medical-grade mask also does not allow water to penetrate through the mask while cloth mask the water goes right through.
Quote from Slick Mick :
This is correct in pre-pandemic thinking, but the notion of wearing cloth masks derives from a shortage of certified medical-grade masks. The disposables currently available are of specious origin and quality - just read the threads on SD about the Wyze masks.
There is no shortage of medical-grade mask, just make sure it meets the standardized specifications of yyt0969-2013, EN 14683-2019, or GBT 32610-2016. I bought 100 Wyze mask and they are perfectly fine. A SDer also did the water test, burn test, and candle test to confirm it is authentic. If quality is of concerned the branded Lemi face mask being sold by newegg is authentic. The only cloth mask I could recommend is one which went through standardized testing like the one below.
Quote from scurrywrx :
Brooks brothers is now selling the ones they are producing for hospitals to the public https://www.brooksbrothers.com/Fa...lt,pd.html [brooksbrothers.com]
1
May 15, 2020
1,394 Posts
Joined Nov 2007

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Joined May 2019
May 15, 2020
Mr_Sadness
May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Quote from luniz97 :
CLOTH MASKS PROTECT FROM ONLY 3% OF PARTICLES

Additionally, researchers found 97% of particles penetrated cloth masks, 44% of particles penetrated medical masks, and <0.01-0.1% of particles penetrated N95 masks.

https://www.ems1.com/ems-products...6YYZs9xJg/ [ems1.com]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/...MC4420971/ [nih.gov]
Quote from coursesix :
The masks are NOT for protecting you. They are for protecting those around you. Please read my post above, and I hope you will understand why it's critically important that everyone wears masks. Yes, I would love it if we had enough N95s (without exhaust valve) and surgical masks for everyone to wear, but right now these are mostly being allocated to hospitals/HCWs. Wearing a mask IS EFFECTIVE in decreasing droplet spread. This has been dogma in medicine/infectious disease for decades. Please, please be careful with making statements like this, because creating false uncertainty/controversy does hurt those around you.
I agree to both of you, cloth mask do not protect the wearer and cloth mask do prevent droplet spread. But why not buy a mask that can do both, one that protects the wearer and prevents droplet spread such as the cloth mask below or medical-grade mask; both of which have undergone standardized testing for filtration efficiency
Quote from scurrywrx :
Brooks brothers is now selling the ones they are producing for hospitals to the public https://www.brooksbrothers.com/Fa...lt,pd.html [brooksbrothers.com]
Last edited by Mr_Sadness May 15, 2020 at 12:04 PM.
May 15, 2020
76 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
May 15, 2020
scar1
May 15, 2020
76 Posts
Quote from coursesix :
There is a lot of misunderstanding and misinformation regarding masks and COVID.

-Masks serve two purposes: 1) filtering your exhaust (ie, preventing transmission to others), which is their main role. and 2) filtering your intake (ie, preventing you from getting it).

-Masks work and should be our main weapon against the virus. The example I give is driving down a highway in LA during rush hour with your windows down-- you get exposed to a lot of car pollution. You can try to reduce pollution by making cars be 6 ft apart (social distancing), but that only works a bit, and it makes traffic worse. You can tell people to stay home and not drive, which helps pollution, but then the economy suffers since people aren't working. So what do you do? You have people close their windows and drive with AC/filtration of input (mask while inhaling), and you make sure the cars have catalytic converters (mask while exhaling). Then people can be protected, without letting the economy take a nosedive.

-If you wait for data/results of studies, then you have missed the boat. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. We have to make decisions based on logic and our understanding of similar pathogens.

-The infection is predominantly spread through droplet transmission. Droplet is different from airborne-- the latter means much smaller particles. Examples of airborne spread includes: VZV (chickenpox), smallpox, rubeola, TB (TB is not a virus). Droplet spread are most other respiratory viruses, including influenza and coronaviruses.

-In the hospital setting, patients with droplet infections get "droplet precautions" -- ie, everyone must wear a surgical mask while entering the room. Those on airborne precautions are typically in negative pressure rooms and require use of an N95 on entry. When patients on airborne precautions (eg TB) are transported around the hospital, the patient wears a surgical mask (not N95) to help prevent the spread to others.

-N95 and surgical masks likely afford similar levels of protection in preventing the wearer from getting droplet-borne viruses. Source: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/...le/2749214

-Droplets are not only spread through coughing/sneezing, but are also spread by talking ("say it, don't spray it") and likely to a lesser extent by breathing

-The major reason that everyone should wear masks in public is because they help prevent an infected person from spreading it.

-This paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903751
shows that cloth masks are inferior to surgical for protecting the WEARER from another droplet born virus (influenza). Note that the control group wasn't mask-less in the study, they did standard care (ie, masking for pts on droplet precautions).

-Despite that, cloth masks likely help prevent spread from infected patients. Even though the weave may not be tight enough to prevent tiny droplets or aersolized particles from coming out, those are also much less infective (lower viral load) than big droplets. Recalling that droplets from speech and saliva are likely a large part of the spread, you can imagine that even without the tightest weave that your ability to expel big globs of saliva are much lower when wearing a cloth mask, esp if it has multiple layers.

-There is likely a substantial number of people who have been infected with minimal or no symptoms. There are multiple lines of evidence supporting this. Here is what I consider to be a landmark paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240128. Basically when they tested everyone in a nursing home, about 50% of those with the virus had no symptoms, but still had viral titers (ie, were very infectious to others). When they checked on them a week later, about 75% of them had developed symptoms, while 25% remained asymptomatic. The takeaways are that in this population about 1/8 of people were infected but had no symptoms (yet still were highly contagious), and that it is common for people to be contagious before they have symptoms. The end result is that we must assume that everyone we encounter could have the virus (and that we could have it as well), and so everyone should wear masks.

-Serology data has also shown the number infected is much higher than what we thought, but still relatively low (a few % in PNW).

-I suspect herd immunity is not possible in this virus, due to its very high infectivity rate. This is why much like smallpox and polio, there needs to be universal mandated vaccinations.

-The young/healthy are likely large vectors of infection. Just because you have a low mortality rate, doesn't mean you can enjoy yourself without precautions, as your grandmother likely has a much higher mortality rate.

-The magic number of "two weeks" for quarantine is not based on how long you are infected; in fact viral carriage (esp through GI shedding) is much longer than 2 weeks. Instead, the two weeks refers to the max length of time between exposure and development of symptoms (usual is 3-5 days). But again, if 1/8 of people never manifest symptoms (and maybe much more than that when you consider serology data and younger populations), to me this 2 week rule doesn't make a lot of sense.

-You can see pictures of Shanghai disney, schools that re-opened in China, etc. Everyone is wearing masks. It's not due to culture. Masks work and this shouldn't be a debate.

-This virus and the news media coverage of it has created too much polarity. Masking is not a political issue. It is a cultural issue. Americans need to accept that wearing a mask is a sign of respect for those around you, much like covering your mouth when you sneeze/cough. And when you approach others without a mask on, you are putting them at risk.

-My vision for the next few months: country rolls out mandatory mask law while in public, with fines for those who don't comply (or worse, send them to jail where they will 100% get COVID). This can allow people to return to work and school. The six foot social distancing rule (which I think is total BS btw) will get relaxed to 3 feet, as long as everyone is masked. Work places will be required to have better ventilation/air exchange with outside. Restaurants will stay closed, except ones that have open air seating, and even then there will be limitations on number of patrons.

-As posted earlier, this graph nicely shows the rates of new infection in countries without mask laws vs those with mask laws (or populations that voluntarily mask):
https://ourworldindata.org/graphe...WN+GBR+USA

TL;DR: Please wear a facial covering (cloth mask, surgical mask, scarf, whatever) while in public to diminish the spread. It is your civic duty.
Very good stuff, thank you.

Just curious, why do you say the 6 foot rule is BS and that 3 feet is fine?

And that is exactly it: wearing a face mask is no different than covering your mouth when you cough or sneeze. You don't do it for YOU, you do it for the people around you.

My dad has COPD and if I saw someone putting his health in jeopardy by not doing something like not wearing a mask, those ignorant individuals would be praying for someone to call the cops.
6
May 15, 2020
6,188 Posts
Joined May 2009

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

May 15, 2020
706 Posts
Joined Jan 2009

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

May 15, 2020
3,316 Posts
Joined Feb 2007
May 15, 2020
po-90260
May 15, 2020
3,316 Posts
I've used 3M N95 masks for over 30 years doing construction and they aren't that good. That 5% that goes through it is nasty. More than that sneaks around the edges. A nose clip only helps a little and still fogs goggles. For better protection I use a double canister painting respirator. Painting a small bathroom still results in burning eyes. Even that respirator doesn't stop poison gases. For viruses your best protection is a strong immune system. Most Americans are sickly or obese because they choose that path through lifestyle choices. Eating junk and not exercising isn't helping. Staying at home isn't helping.
4

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 15, 2020
73 Posts
Joined May 2019
May 15, 2020
Mr.Floppy
May 15, 2020
73 Posts
May 15, 2020
14,476 Posts
Joined Sep 2005
May 15, 2020
HapShaughnessy
May 15, 2020
14,476 Posts
Re. KN95s. Pretty much all -- even those sold by Wyze and Monoprice -- are dodgy. I got 5 authentic 3m KN95s before the reportedly ineffective Monoprice masks got here. They are twice as thick and are bloody hard to breathe through, as they should be. I never opened the Monoprice package and RMAd them. The Wyze are on the way, and I'm expecting the same. Will refuse delivery.

And to borrow from This Week Tonight, now this...
Health Canada issues recall of some KN95 masks made in China
Masks pose 'a health and safety risk,' according to a bulletin issued to importers
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sa...-1.5568734
May 15, 2020
76 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
May 15, 2020
scar1
May 15, 2020
76 Posts
Quote from Mr.Floppy :
https://getlambs.com/products/sil...tive-masks

Also, I think this is a pretty interesting product idea:
https://getlambs.com/products/the-snapback-glove
In theory that's a decent idea, but who is going to walk around with that glove hanging off their waist?

It can't infect you through your hand. It has to get in your mouth/nose/eyes. So just don't touch your face. Problem solved. You don't have to worry about wearing gloves to the grocery store, just seriously refrain from face touching.
1
May 15, 2020
73 Posts
Joined May 2019
May 15, 2020
Mr.Floppy
May 15, 2020
73 Posts
Quote from scar1 :
In theory that's a decent idea, but who is going to walk around with that glove hanging off their waist?

It can't infect you through your hand. It has to get in your mouth/nose/eyes. So just don't touch your face. Problem solved. You don't have to worry about wearing gloves to the grocery store, just seriously refrain from face touching.
Pretty much spot on.
On the the hand touching your face is sort of subconscious. And if you go shopping, touch a bunch of stuff like fridge doors and so on, I think it's more or less unavoidable. Let's say you go back to your car, touch the steering wheel and later you touch that again and your nose is itchy... done.
That being said, no clue if that's really how the virus spreads. But I guess the idea is to avoid touching anything as much as possible even if it looks stupid. Wearing a mask doesn't really look great either and no one cares Big Grin
May 15, 2020
13 Posts
Joined Jul 2018

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

May 15, 2020
140 Posts
Joined Oct 2012
May 15, 2020
bryan67
May 15, 2020
140 Posts
Quote from evan3168 :
Any face masks that aren't behind the ear style? Like ones that go around the head/neck? The ear ones tend to hurt me after only a few minutes.
Just make a mask from an old t shirt. or use a bandana, just as effective. Wave
2
May 15, 2020
326 Posts
Joined Mar 2008
May 15, 2020
thus
May 15, 2020
326 Posts
Quote from TreasureMartian :
Wrong - Those in need of protection need to protect THEMSELVES - There isn't even any real SCIENTIFIC PROOF/DATA that a healthy population wearing mask and locking down the population helps in any way shape or form... And no the CDC & WHO doesn't count, not scientist/ private FOR PROFIT... Seriously people need to start using their brains again or this is gonna get much worse
Lol....

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Joined May 2019
May 15, 2020
Mr_Sadness
May 15, 2020
2,199 Posts
Quote from scurrywrx :
Brooks brothers is now selling the ones they are producing for hospitals to the public https://www.brooksbrothers.com/Fa...lt,pd.html [brooksbrothers.com]
OMGIf these mask from Brooks Brothers really do filter 86% of particles of 0.3 microns they would be equivalent to N86 mask. Since N95 and KN95 filter 95% of particles of 0.3 microns.

Edit: N86 equivalent only if it provides a tight seal
Last edited by Mr_Sadness May 15, 2020 at 02:20 PM.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All