Deal appears dead. Price is now $50 higher.
Ships in 5 weeks. This is double in volume compared to the
m90n deal going on for $400, but has better expansion capability.
These are not "ready to build" so only three preset configurations available, with the highest configuration at $512.10.
For those with work benefits (LifeMart, Perks, etc), this may come even cheaper as I see it for $453.60 instead of $512.10 through LifeMart.
Final price is after today's coupon
EXTRA10DESKTOP
https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/desk...1TC1MTM73Q
59 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Personally, more than just the processor, other expansion options (RAM specifically) is the reason to favor this over m90n, with two negatives:
- $110 more than m90 (for me $53 more + taxes due to LifeMart discount)
- 5 weeks or more to ship
I still ordered it, as I had some rewards to spend. But, will have to see how delayed it is going to be.Personally, more than just the processor, other expansion options (RAM specifically) is the reason to favor this over m90n, with two negatives:
- $110 more than m90 (for me $53 more + taxes due to LifeMart discount)
- 5 weeks or more to ship
I still ordered it, as I had some rewards to spend. But, will have to see how delayed it is going to be.I already ordered an M90n, but this is making me rethink my decision.
I already ordered an M90n, but this is making me rethink my decision.
I ordered the m90n for work, but personally was looking at one of these tiny versions and now bought it. The earlier thread mentioned that the AMD chip itself could be swapped out. So, for folks who like to tinker, having some upgrade / expansion capability will help. For those who need a simple out of the box solution may go for the m90n for the reduced cost, and not worry about updating in the future.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Masejoer
I ordered the m90n for work, but personally was looking at one of these tiny versions and now bought it. The earlier thread mentioned that the AMD chip itself could be swapped out. So, for folks who like to tinker, having some upgrade / expansion capability will help. For those who need a simple out of the box solution may go for the m90n for the reduced cost, and not worry about updating in the future.
At idle, both will consume very little power. At 15W loads, they will be similar in performance (and they average out to performing the same for single-thread work). The AMD chip at 65W can complete heavily-threaded workloads around 50% faster though, allowing it to return back to an idle state while the Intel CPU is still processing. The AMD chip idling at 1W while the Intel chip continues to burn away at 15-25W (plus other system loads) for awhile longer will bridge the gap. The Ryzen is TDP-configurable down to 45W, so this may also run it at the lower number, hurting max frequency by a couple hundred MHz, but also cutting heat by up to 1/3.
Power consumption over time is difficult to compare for completely different products with unknown workloads. The Vega 11 is an excellent on-chip gpu though, and would make me pick the AMD over the u-series i5.
Really love the small foot print and performance.
Built in APU's only good enough for light gaming though.
But last time it was posted it had 4x the RAM, and was $60 less.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Tamdrik
Power consumption over time is difficult to compare for completely different products with unknown workloads. The Vega 11 is an excellent on-chip gpu though, and would make me pick the AMD over the u-series i5.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank IvanI8853
No, it's a computer and has no hands.
I already ordered an M90n, but this is making me rethink my decision.
Bc some people care about environment and like to use less electricity. Also the other one can be 3m taped to back of a monitor (or mounted if want to buy mount).
Yes but not minesweeper