QB0J93VdC0J:https://www.walmart.com/ip/onn-65-Class-4K-2160p-UHD-LED-Roku-Smart-TV-HDR-100021261/422957278+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [googleusercontent.com]====================
Box dimensions of 2019 Hisense H6570G (similar TV):
64.1" x 40.6" x 7.3"
====================
MFG. product Spec sheet for 2019 Hisense H6570G:
https://assets.hisense-usa.com/as...H6570F.pdf
====================
MFG. product spec sheet for 2020 Hisense 65R6E3:
https://assets.hisense-usa.com/as...102020.pdf
====================
MFG. product spec sheet for 2020 Hisense 65R6090G:
https://assets.hisense-usa.com/as...102020.pdf
====================
Box dimensions
Anybody know the box dimensions?
onn. 42" Class FHD (1080P) LED Roku Smart TV [walmart.com] will be $88 on Nov 4th too.
The model seems to almost identical to Hisense H6570G: https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/hisense/h6570g
Now that the sale is over, Walmart has taken down the original link.
But they still have another page with what appears to be the same TV here.
Good if you want to examine the specs.
This appears to be a slight older Hisense H6570F model while the BlackFriday model is H6570G. The newer H6570G has better upscaling and Chroma 4:4:4 for computer usage.
onn. 65" Class 4K (2160p) UHD LED Roku Smart TV HDR (100012587) [walmart.com]
No box dimensions found, but product dimensions are listed as:
11.60 x 57.30 x 35.10 Inches
These cheap TVs tend to have fairly minimal packaging.
Top Comments
I own a 65in LG OLED, and a 55in Samsung Q80R.... Both last year's top TVs for price and performance... And I still use the Hisense 65in I got last year for $240 and I have no issue with the 50in ONN I bought for $100 as well.
Budget 4K are pretty damn good from Septre, ONN and the like... People praise TCL and forget people talked trash about them as well... Same thing for Vizio.
Even more interesting is a lot of budget sets use 2nd tier Samsung VA panels that actually look better than the entry level LGs with poor contrast.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
1.3K Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Are people just returning/exchanging if the display isn't "perfect" or is a less than perfect display the standard? Hope that part makes sense and my question isn't that stupid.
EDIT: may have answered my own question and the answer is no according to site. Still may purchase anyway just in case since $50 is still a good deal for a mount and don't want to miss out if I'm unsuccessful purchasing tomorrow at discounted rate.
Update: Figured it out its wall mounted in all its glory, perfect screen no defects no lines no dead pixels. Now to the nitty gritty. This is the actual wall mounting information that should be stickied. Vesa pattern is NOT 400x200 as listed in description. It's actually 300x200 (as stated on actual box). Mounting screws is M6 10 with washers. The weird thing is the tv came with 2 short stubby ones screwed into back of tvs top 2 mounting holes, they fit perfect with no mount. But once you add your mount brackets/plate and washers the length of that screw is not enough trust me. The M6 10 is dead on the nuts for a mount plate plus washers (which I highly recommend) this unit is pretty heavy and the weight is not listed anywhere so I took zero chances. Do it right the first time. Now if for whatever reason you feel you need a longer screw you can try a m6 12 but I wouldn't go any longer without spacers. Attach mount plate and washer and hand tighten screw to make sure it doesn't bottom out if you feel like trying the m6 12. I went with m6 10s and washers for my mount as the mount plate is low pro. So mount screw size is M6, play with the length for your needs.
I decided to return it - they said I have to wait 24 hours since it was dispensed to me. It's sitting at Walmart and I have to go back tomorrow. The 55" TCL will fit easily. Just needed a few more inche.
EDIT: may have answered my own question and the answer is no according to site. Still may purchase anyway just in case since $50 is still a good deal for a mount and don't want to miss out if I'm unsuccessful purchasing tomorrow at discounted rate.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Are people just returning/exchanging if the display isn't "perfect" or is a less than perfect display the standard? Hope that part makes sense and my question isn't that stupid.
Lines/ DP is avoidable, but these panels still have tremendous amount of Mura defects.
Put on a dark teal slide, and you'll see it. go to windows background, set to a Dark Teal. lower the brightness until you see the splotches, that's the mura.
What it is is, when they put the layers together, if alignment isn't good or it got a bit smooshed, you get these splotches.
Anything in the 200-500 tv range will have this, They gotta get rid of C-grade panels some how.
As someone else said, I could easily compare this TV's picture with a $1,000 TV. Perfect for everyday use.
I bought 2 units, 1 was defective <in a way> that normal people probably wouldn't initially notice, but would bug them over time, bad blue channel gamma tracking. < color cast on grey scale >
2 units produced extremely different images, not even remotely the same, which means these were not properly setup at the factory during initial color tuning. They're probably cranking them out as fast as possible at this price.
Then there's the fact that the panels are C-grade. Lots of mura. My defective unit also had some dead pixels.
This ONN business is basically a walk through a minefield. It's safer for me because I own a colorimeter, but even then, there are some things I can't calibrate away.
I bought 2 units, 1 was defective <in a way> that normal people probably wouldn't initially notice, but would bug them over time, bad blue channel gamma tracking. < color cast on grey scale >
2 units produced extremely different images, not even remotely the same, which means these were not properly setup at the factory during initial color tuning. They're probably cranking them out as fast as possible at this price.
Then there's the fact that the panels are C-grade. Lots of mura. My defective unit also had some dead pixels.
This ONN business is basically a walk through a minefield. It's safer for me because I own a colorimeter, but even then, there are some things I can't calibrate away.
I'm sure you can find a $1,000 TV that's better, my point is this outperforms bottom tier TVs which was an unexpected surprise.
What's a C-grade panel? I'm sure if you run enough tests, you'll find scenarios where this doesn't perform well.
I don't have a budget comparison other than Vizio M7/LG UM7300; so far, this looks much better. Certain aspects, like brightness, surpass several much more expensive sets I have.
I don't have a budget comparison other than Vizio M7/LG UM7300; so far, this looks much better. Certain aspects, like brightness, surpass several much more expensive sets I have.
This ONN tv measures 230-240nits peak, I know because I measured it. UM7300 and M7 both measure higher, it's impossible for this ONN 65 to be brighter.
If you're using the default normal color temp, it's around 8500k, that bumps the brightness because it has extra blue, but it's very much a Blued-Out image. It is brighter than 230, but normalized against an M7 or 7300, the ONN is much dimmer.
So, your observation is partially right, it could be the case that it's brighter perceptually due to contrast imbalance/ blue cast, but it does the community a disservice if we claim out-rightly untrue specifications.
This ONN tv measures 230-240nits peak, I know because I measured it. UM7300 and M7 both measure higher, it's impossible for this ONN 65 to be brighter.
If you're using the default normal color temp, it's around 8500k, that bumps the brightness because it has extra blue, but it's very much a Blued-Out image. It is brighter than 230, but normalized against an M7 or 7300, the ONN is much dimmer.
So, your observation is partially right, it could be the case that it's brighter perceptually due to contrast imbalance/ blue cast, but it does the community a disservice if we claim out-rightly untrue specifications.
I've used 4-5 usb monitors for years that run ~200-250 nits and its impossible for me to believe this is only 250 nits.
I've used 4-5 usb monitors for years that run ~200-250 nits and its impossible for me to believe this is only 250 nits.
Ok from my perspective, you're trying to weigh 2 fat-guys by eye.
I measured my fat-dude with a scale. What's there to argue.
You also shouldn't compare brightness to monitors, because a 65" panel @ 250 nits is equivalent to 5x 24" monitors @ 250nits, So you're comparing 1 panel to 5 panels that way. Of course the bigger panel will be perceptually brighter.
These measurements have to be normalized. for display Area.
I know some folks are videophiles and that's their thing... I get it, but to some people they just want to watch tv with a decent picture because ??? cars are their thing. copy?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!