Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Real-life drama at the beach ... Rammy's in trouble again ... apparently the wife doesn't like me taking pictures of other women

24,862 1,948 July 22, 2009 at 10:01 AM in Cameras
Amongst the ~200 photos I took last week at the beach, I snapped 3-4 pictures of some hotties that were walking up and down the beach. The wife took great offense to this and I thought it was playful at first but (as women are apt to do) an argument ensued which turned into her giving me the cold, silent treatment for the next 24 hours. She indicated I was "to take pictures of only her & the kids".

Disrespectful? Immature? In hindsight a little, but in her words "I'm married, I'm not dead". I wasn't peeping through a peephole at some ESPN hottie, I was taking a picture of someone strolling a few yards in front of me proudly displaying the goods that God gave her. Just how insecure can she be?

Is this a potential for a double standard? The wife had a massage at a day spa from a "young surfer dude" who was checking her out. Do I come out with the directive "no man can touch you except for me at any time". To take it to another level, shouldn't I be able to get lap dances (I don't btw) without feeling guilty. I agree that's extreme, but give me a break.

I thought things had cooled down the next day or two (makeup OTs) but then out of the blue the wife went through and deleted the pictures on my camera - which simply pissed me off. The following is all that's left. It was intended to be a humorous presentation to the lounge: (a) picture of hotties, (b) picture of wife holding up hand in front of camera, (c) picture of ocean as wife punched hubby in stomach.

Community Wiki

Last Edited by daniel32 July 23, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Quote from briang :
let me be the first to say......


second...



third...

532 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
07-22-2009 at 12:11 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:11 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
I first said she should have talked to him and hopefully he would have deleted it on his own.

I don't think deleting a picture that (hopefully) wasn't important to him, that he took in passing, is quite the same thing as a prized dish that she spent hours on. I don't see how it's the same in that the picture clearly hurt and bothered her - did her cooking for him hurt or bother him? They're two completely different situations.

In the exact same comparison - she takes a picture of some hot guy as she's sitting next to him on the beach - and he deletes it... I don't see the big deal. If he felt that posessive of that picture, I do see a huge problem with that. Why was the picture of that random woman in a bikini so important to him?
Damn, I'm about to agree with jj again.

It's not about the picture, which is why I was trying to give a different scenario. It's about control and boundaries.


I still think he's an idiot for taking the picture, but he should have deleted it. His wife had no right to delete it. She had a right of being mad, she had a right of not talking to him, she had a right to ask him to delete it, she had a right to go out and take picture of hot men, but she had no right to delete his picture.
Reply
Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
07-22-2009 at 12:12 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:12 PM.
Quote from Scampsters :
So there isnt a single items thats yours in your home. ?
Sure there is, that's not the point. It was just a picture he took in passing, though. I don't understand the posessiveness in that situation.

And yeah, my husband does throw away my/our stuff all the time without asking me - and doing it purposefully behind my back. But that's more of a save things vs. minimalist mindset back and forth thing we deal with. I find it annoying, but not like it's crossing boundaries unless it happens to be something that had sentimental value for me.
Reply
Joined May 2005
Proud Barner
> bubble2 36,606 Posts
1,385 Reputation
TigerStar
07-22-2009 at 12:13 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:13 PM.
Just curious, what makes it 'his' picture? The fact that he took it? If he had taken naked pics of his wife, would they still be just 'his' pictures?
Reply
Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
07-22-2009 at 12:17 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:17 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
Damn, I'm about to agree with jj again.

It's not about the picture, which is why I was trying to give a different scenario. It's about control and boundaries.


I still think he's an idiot for taking the picture, but he should have deleted it. His wife had no right to delete it. She had a right of being mad, she had a right of not talking to him, she had a right to ask him to delete it, she had a right to go out and take picture of hot men, but she had no right to delete his picture.
My point is, within the boundaries of MY marriage (and I know different marriages vary), my husband would have no right to take that picture in the first place. He had a right to not marry me and not enter into the situation in the first place but he did choose to be a part of 'us'. That picture would cross boundaries in the first place. So if I deleted it and also crossed boundaries, I see it more as a wash than me being the only one in the wrong. Overall, just not that bad of me.

I feel that I've been very clear in saying different marriages have to set their own sets of boundaries. I can only speak to the situation as I would see it - from my perspective in life.
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
07-22-2009 at 12:17 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:17 PM.
Quote from TigerStar :
Just curious, what makes it 'his' picture? The fact that he took it? If he had taken naked pics of his wife, would they still be just 'his' pictures?
Yes, and maybe.

How are naked pictures different than clothed pictures of his wife?
Reply
Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
07-22-2009 at 12:18 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:18 PM.
Quote from TigerStar :
Just curious, what makes it 'his' picture? The fact that he took it? If he had taken naked pics of his wife, would they still be just 'his' pictures?
Interesting question. If he took a picture of the wife and she hated how she looked in it and deleted it... according to some people here, that'd be just as bad, right?
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
07-22-2009 at 12:20 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:20 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
My point is, within the boundaries of MY marriage (and I know different marriages vary), my husband would have no right to take that picture in the first place. He had a right to not marry me and not enter into the situation in the first place but he did choose to be a part of 'us'. That picture would cross boundaries in the first place. So if I deleted it and also crossed boundaries, I see it more as a wash than me being the only one in the wrong. Overall, just not that bad of me.

I feel that I've been very clear in saying different marriages have to set their own sets of boundaries. I can only speak to the situation as I would see it - from my perspective in life.
So in YOUR marriage, two wrongs make a right? Interesting. I guess your husband would need to sleep with 2 different women to even things out.

Quote from BrgnHntr :
Interesting question. If he took a picture of the wife and she hated how she looked in it and deleted it... according to some people here, that'd be just as bad, right?
If he liked the picture, and again she didn't ask him and just went and deleted it, then yes.
Reply
Last edited by Fallacy July 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined May 2005
Proud Barner
> bubble2 36,606 Posts
1,385 Reputation
TigerStar
07-22-2009 at 12:20 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:20 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
So in YOUR marriage, two wrongs make a right? Interesting. I guess your husband would need to sleep with 2 different women to even things out.
Actually, he'd have to cheat and then she'd have to cheat.
Reply
Joined Nov 2003
Double Staff Oreos
> bubble2 26,901 Posts
2,394 Reputation
Global Mod
rayzac | Staff
07-22-2009 at 12:21 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:21 PM.
Quote from TigerStar :
Actually, he'd have to cheat and then she'd have to cheat.
Or sleep with a girl then a guy Dontknow
Reply
Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
So in YOUR marriage, two wrongs make a right? Interesting. I guess your husband would need to sleep with 2 different women to even things out.



If he liked the picture, and again she didn't ask him and just went and deleted it, then yes.
No, two wrongs don't make a right. But neither of them have much ground to stand on being mad at the other when they are both in the wrong.

And it is a little different... the picture being of her, she does own it.

Not sure what you mean by he'd have to sleep with two different women, Max. Confused
Reply
Last edited by BrgnHntr July 22, 2009 at 12:23 PM.
Joined May 2004
Warning free 10 years!
> bubble2 24,862 Posts
1,948 Reputation
Original Poster
Ram|bunc|tious
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
In the exact same comparison - she takes a picture of some hot guy as she's sitting next to him on the beach - and he deletes it... I don't see the big deal. If he felt that posessive of that picture, I do see a huge problem with that. Why was the picture of that random woman in a bikini so important to him?
Question: should she be upset if I did this?

... omg ... what if she finds pr0n on my computer at home? ... can she delete that as well? ... Shocking

/door slams Biker
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:23 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
No, two wrongs don't make a right. But neither of them have much ground to stand on being mad at the other when they are both in the wrong.

And it is a little different... the picture being of her, she does own it.
Even better, thanks! In that case his wife had to right deleting that picture, since the woman on the beach owns the picture.
Reply
Joined May 2004
Warning free 10 years!
> bubble2 24,862 Posts
1,948 Reputation
Original Poster
Ram|bunc|tious
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
Damn, I'm about to agree with jj again.

It's not about the picture, which is why I was trying to give a different scenario. It's about control and boundaries.


I still think he's an idiot for taking the picture, but he should have deleted it. His wife had no right to delete it. She had a right of being mad, she had a right of not talking to him, she had a right to ask him to delete it, she had a right to go out and take picture of hot men, but she had no right to delete his picture.
Iagree
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
Not sure what you mean by he'd have to sleep with two different women, Max. Confused
I was just yanking your chain. Since in your marriage two wrongs make a right. If your husband was wrong twice (had an affair with 2 women), he'd be right!
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
07-22-2009 at 12:24 PM.
Quote from TigerStar :
Actually, he'd have to cheat and then she'd have to cheat.
I'm not saying anyone HAS to do things to get back at the other. But if you have two spouses in a marriage who both cheat on each other, it sounds kind of hypocritical for one to get pissed at the other when they're just as guilty...
Reply
Page 15 of 36
Start the Conversation
 

More Cameras Deals & Discounts

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.