Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
Nikon Mirrorless Camera's: Z7 Body $2297, Z6 Body $1397, Z5 Body Expired
$997
$1,397.00
& More + Free S/H
Update: This deal is still available.
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle with 32GB SD Card, Bag, PC Software & Acc $996.95 (orig $1396.95)
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera with 24-50mm Lens Kit w/32GB Card, PC Software & Acc. $1296.95 (orig $1696.95)
- Nikon Z5 Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens $1696.95 (orig $2196.95)
- Per the site: "Coming Soon: This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected in a few days."
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body $1396.95 (orig $1996.95)
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens $1996.95 (orig $2596.95)
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body With Free MAC Accessory Bundle $2296.95 (orig $2796.95)
- Temporarily on backroder
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirorless Camera with 24-70mm f/4 S Lens W/Free Accessory Kit $2896.95 (orig $3396.95)
- Note: You may also add Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ to any of the above purchases for $96.95 (discount will show in cart)
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
- About this deal:
- Our research indicates that the offer for the Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle is $400 lower (29% savings) than the list price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $1396.95.
- About these products:
- Nikon 1 Year Limited Warranty.
- Please refer to the forum thread for additional deal ideas & discussion.
- About this store:
- Adorama is an authorised Nikon dealer.
- Details of Adorama's return policy can be found here.
Original Post
Written by
Edited May 9, 2021
at 05:05 PM
These are lowest prices that I have seen for brand new units from Authorized dealers
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle with 32GB SD Card, Bag, PC Software & Acc [adorama.com] $996.95 (orig $1396.95)
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera with 24-50mm Lens Kit w/32GB Card, PC Software & Acc. [adorama.com] $1296.95 (orig $1696.95)
- Nikon Z5 Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens [adorama.com] $1696.95 (orig $2196.95) QA Note: Per the site: "Coming Soon: This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected in a few days."
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body [adorama.com] $1396.95 (orig $1996.95)
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens [adorama.com] $1996.95 (orig $2596.95)
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body With Free MAC Accessory Bundle [adorama.com] $2296.95 (orig $2796.95) >Temporarily On Backorder
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirorless Camera with 24-70mm f/4 S Lens W/Free Accessory Kit [adorama.com] $2896.95 (orig $3396.95)
- Add Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ [adorama.com] for only $96.95 after $150 savings with purchase
in
Cameras
(8)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Cameras Deals
View AllFrontpage
$1999
+ Free Shipping
25
65
Frontpage
$50.50
+ Free S/H
20
6
Frontpage
$1997
+ Free Shipping
18
40
140 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Avatar77
Go to mirrorless.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank chrisngem
My qualm with switching over to mirrorless was really with the lack of the pentaprism (WYSIWYG), but after living with the EVF for a week, found it was a better experience, especially in low light.
Do you own any lenses? What do you plan to shoot?
Z 5 w/NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR https://smile.amazon.co
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And I am using Canon lens now. But Canon has lost my favor over the years due to their lack of innovation. I have been looking to jump ship for a while now.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank az060693
And I am using Canon now. But Canon has lost my favor over the years due to their lack of innovation. I have been looking to jump ship for a while now.
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
(...)
None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
For me, it came down to Nikon's handling (disclaimer: I've gotten used to the multitude of Nikons I've owned in the past); so recommendation still applies: if you're able to rent or otherwise get the bodies on loan - you can see which interface you prefer. I've got a lot of friends that love and shoot Sony (and I can't see why - so you see it's very subjective).
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
I am by no means a professional photographer, but I went from a Nikon D7000 to a Sony A7iii. I really appreciate the plethora of Sony e mount lenses out there from brands like Tamron and Samyang/Rokinon but they are still quite expensive. I don't have the budget for Sony G master lenses so thats nice that there are so many third party available. With that being said, while Sony AF is the best, I still cannot get used to/like Sony color rendition. It's the biggest downside by far when comparing to the other two brands. I personally love Canon body/lenses the best but even nikon colors are so much better than Sony. My dad has the Z6 and when compared to my Tamron 28-75mm 2.8, the 24-70 Nikon is sharper and a great overall lens. The color rendering alone is making me want to switch back to Nikon. What do you guys think I should do? Thinking about Z7.
I would like to use the following lenses:
35mm 1.4
Some type of telephoto like 24-200.
85mm 1.8/1.4
Macro. Sigma 105? Nikon? Still have a Tokina 100mm in my old bag I can probably use.