Our research indicates that this 512GB Gigabyte M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 1.3 SSD is $16.08 lower (26% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting at $62.07 at the time of this posting.
About this product:
Comes with a 5-year limited warranty.
Sequential Read Speed: up to 1700 MB/s
Sequential Write speed: up to 1550 MB/s
Endurance: 800TBW
About this store:
See the Newegg return policy for returns information.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Our research indicates that this 512GB Gigabyte M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 1.3 SSD is $16.08 lower (26% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting at $62.07 at the time of this posting.
About this product:
Comes with a 5-year limited warranty.
Sequential Read Speed: up to 1700 MB/s
Sequential Write speed: up to 1550 MB/s
Endurance: 800TBW
About this store:
See the Newegg return policy for returns information.
For those that are not aware, Newegg went public on Nasdaq, just a month ago, with Chinese investors. They were bad before, but just wait. I'm done with them. Just last month, SD was advertising Newegg's IPO on their own advertising bulletins, knowingly or not.
apples to oranges.
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
46 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank seanleeforever
Quote
from alseTrewoP
:
i wonder if Amazon will Price Match
any reason not to jump on this deal
what stands out is the Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW more then double most
and it VERY LOW POWER 3.3v - 1a
many others are 3.3v - 2.8a those will get very hot and suck batteries dry
apples to oranges.
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
Last edited by seanleeforever June 27, 2021 at 01:07 AM.
apples to oranges.
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
apples to oranges.
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
thank you for the info
i looked at the Specs 980 FOR THE 500gb Power Draw:
4.3 W (Active) 5.9 W (Max) 5.0 mW (Standby) [B]~1.8amps Endurance TBW: 300 TB
the Gigabyte 512gb
Power Draw:
Avg. Read : 3.3W ; Write : 2.8W (Idle) 1.8mw ~1amp Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW
so the Gigabyte is $14 less
the Gigabyte is slower but still faster then any Sata SSD
uses ~1/2 the power and is Guaranteed to last more the 2 times longer
Last edited by alseTrewoP June 27, 2021 at 05:10 AM.
Being single core and dram less and offering 800TBW i am sure is not going to last long either way they just wanna sell it, if it breaks down sure then there is warranty but still is your data.
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
apples to oranges.
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
Where did you get this info that 980 performs 100% better?
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
thank you for the info
i looked at the Specs 980 FOR THE 500gb Power Draw:
4.3 W (Active) 5.9 W (Max) 5.0 mW (Standby) [B]~1.8amps Endurance TBW: 300 TB
the Gigabyte 512gb
Power Draw:
Avg. Read : 3.3W ; Write : 2.8W (Idle) 1.8mw ~1amp Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW
so the Gigabyte is $14 less
the Gigabyte is slower but still faster then any Sata SSD
uses ~1/2 the power and is Guaranteed to last more the 2 times longer
"uses ~1/2 the power and is Guaranteed to last more the 2 times longer"
No. Your storage device in normal usage won't go full power for more than 30secs. It's both very unlikely for your laptop to do something that requires full power, and it's unlikely any super high load task would last for longer. The max power rating on SSD is most likely thinned out to less than 10%. That makes the difference in number much smaller.
This is not yet considering that your CPU is going to be fully tolled when your SSD is doing heavy work. That is easily more than 15W, and some times all the way to 65W. So even if your SSD on full power uses 10W, compared to something uses 0W (magical SSD!) you are getting 66.7% longer battery life by the most optimal condition. Real world number will be somewhere around 5% mostly.
The more important factor for battery life would be sleep state power consumption, but it is not on the spec sheet that I can find.
It is recommended to read benchmarks like what Tom's Hardware is doing, which includes efficiency tests. Do not rely on spec number as they are defining only the envelope and sometimes just lies.
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
46 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
any reason not to jump on this deal
what stands out is the
Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW more then double most
and it VERY LOW POWER 3.3v - 1a
many others are 3.3v - 2.8a those will get very hot and suck batteries dry
any reason not to jump on this deal
what stands out is the
Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW more then double most
and it VERY LOW POWER 3.3v - 1a
many others are 3.3v - 2.8a those will get very hot and suck batteries dry
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank seanleeforever
any reason not to jump on this deal
what stands out is the
Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW more then double most
and it VERY LOW POWER 3.3v - 1a
many others are 3.3v - 2.8a those will get very hot and suck batteries dry
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
i looked at the Specs
980 FOR THE 500gb
Power Draw:
4.3 W (Active) 5.9 W (Max) 5.0 mW (Standby) [B]~1.8amps
Endurance TBW: 300 TB
the Gigabyte 512gb
Power Draw:
Avg. Read : 3.3W ; Write : 2.8W (Idle) 1.8mw ~1amp
Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW
so the Gigabyte is $14 less
the Gigabyte is slower but still faster then any Sata SSD
uses ~1/2 the power and is Guaranteed to last more the 2 times longer
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
BUT this is a gem for in a laptop with 1/2 the drain and very cool
in a desktop it would not typically matter EXCEPT LASTING 2x longer
if you compare dram-less nvme, their power consumption are about the same.
case in point, 980 is maxed out at 4.3W (and about twice as fast both on read and write)
SN550 is maxed out at 3.9W (and about 50% faster on read)
so if you REALLY value about battery life, you should care about performance per unit watt. 980 consumes 30% more power but performs 100% better, so for a given task, it is actually uses 40% less power, all for 10 dollar more.
honestly, given the 980's price tag and performance, i don't know why anyone would go for anything else for general home use(esp at MSRP)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
i looked at the Specs
980 FOR THE 500gb
Power Draw:
4.3 W (Active) 5.9 W (Max) 5.0 mW (Standby) [B]~1.8amps
Endurance TBW: 300 TB
the Gigabyte 512gb
Power Draw:
Avg. Read : 3.3W ; Write : 2.8W (Idle) 1.8mw ~1amp
Warranty: Limited 5-year or 800TBW
so the Gigabyte is $14 less
the Gigabyte is slower but still faster then any Sata SSD
uses ~1/2 the power and is Guaranteed to last more the 2 times longer
No. Your storage device in normal usage won't go full power for more than 30secs. It's both very unlikely for your laptop to do something that requires full power, and it's unlikely any super high load task would last for longer. The max power rating on SSD is most likely thinned out to less than 10%. That makes the difference in number much smaller.
This is not yet considering that your CPU is going to be fully tolled when your SSD is doing heavy work. That is easily more than 15W, and some times all the way to 65W. So even if your SSD on full power uses 10W, compared to something uses 0W (magical SSD!) you are getting 66.7% longer battery life by the most optimal condition. Real world number will be somewhere around 5% mostly.
The more important factor for battery life would be sleep state power consumption, but it is not on the spec sheet that I can find.
It is recommended to read benchmarks like what Tom's Hardware is doing, which includes efficiency tests. Do not rely on spec number as they are defining only the envelope and sometimes just lies.
Leave a Comment