Amazon.com has
1TB Kingston A2000 NVMe M.2 2280 PCIe Solid State Drive (SA2000M8/1000G) on sale for
$79.99.
Shipping is free.
Thanks community member
Suryasis for sharing this deal
Product Features:
- Sequential Read/Write: up to 2,200/2,000MB/s
- Random 4K Read/Write: up to 250,000/220,000 IOPS
- TCG Opal, AES 256-bit, eDrive Hardware Encryption
- Ideal for Ultrabooks and small-form-factor PC
Top Comments
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-p5-m-2-nvme-ssd-review
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/kingston-a2000-m2-nvme-ssd [tomshardware.com]
Go through the above review links for P5 and A2000 respectively.
Scoring higher sequential speeds on CrystalDiskMark or whatever doesn't make the drive faster, because those speeds will almost never be relevant.
https://www.techpowerup
You can see here they perform pretty much identically in real world usage. A2000 even edges it out a bit overall. It only loses when doing long, intensive write workloads (again, hardly ever relevant) because of the A2000's inconsistent SLC utilization.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
34 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Much faster and stays cooler
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-p5-m-2-nvme-ssd-review
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/kingston-a2000-m2-nvme-ssd [tomshardware.com]
Go through the above review links for P5 and A2000 respectively.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-p5-m-2-nvme-ssd-review
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/kingston-a2000-m2-nvme-ssd [tomshardware.com]
Go through the above review links for P5 and A2000 respectively.
I have both P5 and Kingston running here and I can tell P5 is much FASTER and almost always cooler 😀
Consider where UEFI was adopted to counter BIOS viruses, that was then quickly turned into some manufacturers applying even further restrictive BIOS level encoding to curb competition. The Open Source markets were in an uproar over no Legacy option to easily use Linux, etc.. More recently Intel adopted Intel Rapid Stor(e) tech that placed extreme limitations on Open Source, and led the way to further proprietary, monopolistic practices like even more chip/board manufacturers are considering/applying.
And this on top of suppressive markets due to supply chain/economic/ecological swings...
This pattern will continue to cause even more 'viral' vacillations in these, and ancillary value spaces for years - if not decades to come if extreme measures are not taken to curb them.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Is slower and hotter than the one on the thread? Thanks
Is slower and hotter than the one on the thread? Thanks
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
A2000 has the same setup as the P5 (2 channels) and controllers in the same tier, P5's does run hotter though, I tested them a few months back. The a2000 is in between midrange and budget due to the 64l or 96l micron nand (sequential speeds on 4k r/w similar to drives with QLC nand) and 2263 controller not even close to a 2262en controller.
A2000 has the same setup as the P5 (2 channels) and controllers in the same tier, P5's does run hotter though, I tested them a few months back. The a2000 is in between midrange and budget due to the 64l or 96l micron nand (sequential speeds on 4k r/w similar to drives with QLC nand) and 2263 controller not even close to a 2262en controller.
Temperature wise I do not feel any difference .. I'll go for P5 anyday over this a2000​
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
I have both P5 and Kingston running here and I can tell P5 is much FASTER and almost always cooler 😀
Scoring higher sequential speeds on CrystalDiskMark or whatever doesn't make the drive faster, because those speeds will almost never be relevant.
https://www.techpowerup
You can see here they perform pretty much identically in real world usage. A2000 even edges it out a bit overall. It only loses when doing long, intensive write workloads (again, hardly ever relevant) because of the A2000's inconsistent SLC utilization.
Scoring higher sequential speeds on CrystalDiskMark or whatever doesn't make the drive faster, because those speeds will almost never be relevant.
https://www.techpowerup
You can see here they perform pretty much identically in real world usage. A2000 even edges it out a bit overall. It only loses when doing long, intensive write workloads (again, hardly ever relevant) because of the A2000's inconsistent SLC utilization.
P5 only if you can put heatsink? I probably wont have a heatsink for the laptop
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
P5 only if you can put heatsink? I probably wont have a heatsink for the laptop
Even in workloads where the P5 should beat the A2000, it likely won't beat it by that much since it's certainly going to throttle even harder on a laptop.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!