In short:
- the autofocus is slow and quite noisy, but works
- significant amount of purple fringing at f1.8
- soft image in the corners at f1.8
If they have a Photoshop profile for this lens (I am not sure they have it), with a 1 button, you can take of purple fringing. How is it compared to Canon EP 85 mm quality?
Canon's 85/1.8 EF is better in just about every way. Faster, quieter AF, less fringing, fairly sharp throughout. But of course, considerably higher price.
Canon's 85/1.8 EF is better in just about every way. Faster, quieter AF, less fringing, fairly sharp throughout. But of course, considerably higher price.
Canon EF 85mm is not that much higher price if you go used. And I would trust a used Canon over a new cheap noname lens like this one.
15 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
when i checked specs it said manual focus, i just checked again and you're both right, so i must have been daydreaming
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank olegk
In short:
- the autofocus is slow and quite noisy, but works
- significant amount of purple fringing at f1.8
- soft image in the corners at f1.8
In short:
- the autofocus is slow and quite noisy, but works
- significant amount of purple fringing at f1.8
- soft image in the corners at f1.8
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
F0.95 is the new hotness
Canon's 85/1.8 EF is better in just about every way. Faster, quieter AF, less fringing, fairly sharp throughout. But of course, considerably higher price.
Thanks
Thanks
cheap is relative, and it's better to just state your price range.
Back when I bought my first Canon rebel, I thought my 55-250mm took nice shots at the zoo.