Note: Availability/pricing may vary by stores; may not be available in all areas. Must login to your Target account to save this offer to utilize it for in-store purchase only.
Thanks to community member DrBargin for finding this deal
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
About this deal:
Sign-up for Target RedCard to save an additional 5%, receive free shipping, and an extended return period.
Pricing may vary depending on store, however, if pricing is established at $1.99, final price should be Free after the Target Circle manufacturer coupon
Must utilize this coupon for in-store purchase only
Limit of one coupon per item/per household
Offer valid through July 19, 2022, or while manufacturer coupon/supplies last
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
EWG is not credible - they are funded with the purpose of driving sales to pseudo-scientific marketed brands, using fear tactics and often suggesting you be afraid to buy from brands without conclusive reasoning.
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
This sunscreen has Oxybenzone in it. There's been concerns with this specific chemical. But it also has other chemicals at levels much higher than what is considered safe in Europe according to their research.
Looks like UC Berkeley was involved in the studies so you know some intelligent people were involved. This site is full of uneducated folk known to mock CA for stating compounds are carcinogenic. Most of them have no idea what is involved in the studies and probably would not be able to comprehend the studies if they read them.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank PocketsThick
07-03-2022 at 10:37 PM.
This sunscreen has Oxybenzone in it. There's been concerns with this specific chemical. But it also has other chemicals at levels much higher than what is considered safe in Europe according to their research.
This sunscreen has Oxybenzone in it. There's been concerns with this specific chemical. But it also has other chemicals at levels much higher than what is considered safe in Europe according to their research.
Looks like UC Berkeley was involved in the studies so you know some intelligent people were involved. This site is full of uneducated folk known to mock CA for stating compounds are carcinogenic. Most of them have no idea what is involved in the studies and probably would not be able to comprehend the studies if they read them.
This sunscreen has Oxybenzone in it. There's been concerns with this specific chemical. But it also has other chemicals at levels much higher than what is considered safe in Europe according to their research.
49 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Nevemind...that is my Target Circle savings amount.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank PocketsThick
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
Better than skin cancer?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Worse than zinc sunscreen
Better than Yogurt?
Better than a plain scone?
It's had to lather yourself with a scone...