Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
09/21/22 | Amazon | $71.27 |
0 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $99 |
Product Name: | Celestron - 70mm Travel Scope - Portable Refractor Telescope - Fully-Coated Glass Optics - Ideal Telescope for Beginners - BONUS Astronomy Software Package |
Manufacturer: | Celestron |
Model Number: | 21035 |
Product SKU: | B001TI9Y2M |
UPC: | 50234210355 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
19 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And 98% of those reviews are probably paid for.
Don't forget you have to let the scope acclimate to the night air temperature. The moon will look like it's **boiling** until the temp equalizes
Could take a hour or more
Any recommendations?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank The_Love_Spud
A refractor telescope like the one in this deal can be usable for someone like a young kid (or anyone less interested in handling more precious binoculars or storing a larger telescope) to get a better peek at the moon, but I'd typically argue in favor of even cheaper reflector telescopes for that kind of application. Comparable models are smaller, even cheaper, and can often be improved upon if/when that becomes an interest.
Despite any arguments in favor of or against refractor or reflector telescopes, below the $100 price the only thing you'd be buying of the highest relative quality really is a pair of binoculars.
My own take modifies one that I would reinforce from a popular review site, so consider my opinions below with some context from the linked site:
- At this price point, maybe think about binoculars
- A reflector telescope at this price point can often be made better with modifications/accessories (See even just the top paragraph [telescopicwatch.com] in this article)
- A refractor telescope at this price point (like the one in this deal) is usually hopeless garbage despite some of the functional advantages that get cited by advocates for them (Compare and contrast a review from the same site as the one above for the Celestron 114AZ which also does not recommend [telescopicwatch.com] this Celestron scope)
For the money I'd note that binoculars have many of the advantages a refractor would provide without being garbage at the given sub-$100 price point. I'm not dismissing the arguments in favor of refractor telescopes, I'm just dismissing the quality argument when shopping sub-$100 telescopes. No inexpensive telescope is going to be great out of the box, period. If you're lucky, they'll do the basics without being too frustrating to diminish the experience for the (usually) enthusiastic users.Good luck!
Jon
Any recommendations?
Go to offerup or Craigslist and look for a used Dobsonian. Most are in the 8" size and those will perform really well in viewing planets and the moon. The best planets to look at are Jupiter, Saturn and on a very rare case Mars (Must go to a really dark site). The moon should look spectacular with the views of craters.
Any recommendations?
Tons of them for sale all the time.
Small enough to move around, yet big enough to actually see something.
A refractor telescope like the one in this deal can be usable for someone like a young kid (or anyone less interested in handling more precious binoculars or storing a larger telescope) to get a better peek at the moon, but I'd typically argue in favor of even cheaper reflector telescopes for that kind of application. Comparable models are smaller, even cheaper, and can often be improved upon if/when that becomes an interest.
Despite any arguments in favor of or against refractor or reflector telescopes, below the $100 price the only thing you'd be buying of the highest relative quality really is a pair of binoculars.
My own take modifies one that I would reinforce from a popular review site, so consider my opinions below with some context from the linked site:
- At this price point, maybe think about binoculars
- A reflector telescope at this price point can often be made better with modifications/accessories (See even just the top paragraph [telescopicwatch.com] in this article)
- A refractor telescope at this price point (like the one in this deal) is usually hopeless garbage despite some of the functional advantages that get cited by advocates for them (Compare and contrast a review from the same site as the one above for the Celestron 114AZ which also does not recommend [telescopicwatch.com] this Celestron scope)
For the money I'd note that binoculars have many of the advantages a refractor would provide without being garbage at the given sub-$100 price point. I'm not dismissing the arguments in favor of refractor telescopes, I'm just dismissing the quality argument when shopping sub-$100 telescopes. No inexpensive telescope is going to be great out of the box, period. If you're lucky, they'll do the basics without being too frustrating to diminish the experience for the (usually) enthusiastic users.Good luck!
Jon